Users pay higher fee than intended

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Protocol mints incorrect depositAmount and depositShare to protocol. Such that reserveFee is higher than defined. Suppose following scenario: 1. Tranche 2 has 20% APR, has 5000 borrowed 2. Tranche 1 has 10% APR, has 10000 borrowed 3. ReserveFee is 10% 4...

A malicious user can steal a reserved token by using shift() function of Well.sol if the well was added liquidity unsafely with zero amount of the one of tokens.

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact A malicious user can steal a reserved token by using shift function of Well.sol if the well was added liquidity unsafely with zero amount of the one of tokens. Proof of Concept Let's assume the well with WETH and USDC tokens. Currently totalSupply is zer...

Well.sol::addLiquidity() Unauthorized Liquidity Addition for Fee-on-Transfer Tokens

Lines of code Vulnerability details Description The addLiquidity in the Well.sol contract allows any address to add liquidity to tokens with a fee-on-transfer mechanism. Although there is a another function available to add liquidity for Fee-on-transfer token name addLiquidityFeeOnTransfer. Howev...

Unsafe system contract verification

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact On the following function: function isSystemContractaddress address internal pure returns bool return uint160address = uint160MAXSYSTEMCONTRACTADDRESS; it does check whether an address is a system contract by checking whether it is smaller than...

The _recipient address has no limits to the amount of tokenID (NFTs) it can own

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Since the recipient address has no limit to the number of tokenIds it can hold, this makes it possible for an attacker to call the register function many times with different addresses and send many tokenIds to the same recipient, which could cause a...

fee loss in AutoPxGmx and AutoPxGlp and reward loss in AutoPxGlp by calling PirexRewards.claim(pxGmx/pxGpl, AutoPx*) directly which transfers rewards to AutoPx* pool without compound logic get executed and fee calculation logic and pxGmx wouldn't be executed for those rewards

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Function compound in AutoPxGmx and AutoPxGlp contracts is for compounding pxGLP and additionally pxGMX rewards. it works by calling PirexGmx.claimpx, this to collect the rewards of the vault and then swap the received amount to calculate the reward,...

Theft of ETH that was not used for the successful execution of orders

Lines of code Vulnerability details Description There are execute and bulkExecute functions in Exchange smart contract. There is the refund of any ETH that was unused for example that was left due to the unsuccessful order execution at the end of its execution flow: returnDust; returnDust functio...

Unsafe Initializations Of Bridge Contracts

Lines of code Vulnerability details Vulnerability Details During the zkSync initialization process, several complicated tasks would be required to execute. Incorrect configurations in some tasks could lead to unexpected vulnerabilities. One task of the zkSync initialization process is deploying a...

TokenHelper.sol#L40 : safeTransfer will revert due to insufficient gas.

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact I am adding as high issue since most of the calling is done using the safeTransfer TokenHelper.solL40 : safeTransfer will revert due to insufficient gas. All the fuctions that are using the safeTransfer could fail due to insufficient gas. I see the...

No Storage Gap for Upgradeable Contract Might Lead to Storage Slot Collision

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact For upgradeable contracts, there must be storage gap to "allow developers to freely add new state variables in the future without compromising the storage compatibility with existing deployments" quote OpenZeppelin. Otherwise it may be very difficult to...

PoolTemplate.sol initialize() can be called by attacker during deployment

Handle jayjonah8 Vulnerability details Impact In PoolTemplate.sol the initialize function sets important storage variables like conditions and references and this function can only be called once. During deployment an attacker can monitor the blockchain byte code and call the initialize function...

Upgraded Q -> 3 from #146 [1706014097180]

Judge has assessed an item in Issue 146 as 3 risk. The relevant finding follows: L-6: OLAS minting via treasury is not guaranteed The OLAS.mint… method does not revert if the requested amount cannot be limited due to the inflation limit: function mintaddress account, uint256 amount external //...

Upgraded Q -> 2 from #341 [1705001382135]

Judge has assessed an item in Issue 341 as 2 risk. The relevant finding follows: L03: Auction parameters can be changed during an auction --- The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: All reactions...

Attacker can cause deposits to be locked in the Solana lockbox

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact An attacker can cause deposits to be locked in the lockbox Proof of Concept In withdraw, if the position has 0 liquidity the execution is reverted function withdrawuint64 amount external address positionAddress =...

Potential inaccurate calculation of maxBond and effectiveBond in case of delayed call to checkpoint()

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The checkpoint function in the Tokenomics contract is responsible for recording global data when a new epoch starts. This function contains a potential issue when the checkpoint function is not called exactly at the end of an epoch that finishes very clo...

position can be opened without premium

Lines of code Vulnerability details Description Premium in ParticlePositionManager is used to cover trading fees accrued for the liquidity borrowed. When liquidating, a portion of the premium is also used for the liquidation reward. The issue is that a borrower can open a position without any...

In some pools, borrowers can maliciously prevent liquidatePosition()

Lines of code Vulnerability details Vulnerability details in liquidatePosition At the end of the liquidation, the liquidation fee will be transferred to the liquidator. function liquidatePosition DataStruct.ClosePositionParams calldata params, address borrower external override nonReentrant...

lack of slippage protection for increaseLiquidity, and decreaseLiquidity

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Lack of slippage protection for increasing and decreasing liquidity can cause the liquidity provider to provide liquidity at an unfavorable price. Or the borrower to borrow/repay in a manipulated pool. Proof of Concept When adding liquidity eventually...

Calls to get_virtual_price() are vulnerable to read-only reentrancy

Lines of code 117 Vulnerability details getvirtualprice was originally considered to be a manipulation-resistant price - suitable as a price oracle, but it was later found to be vulnerable to a read-only reentrancy attack, where the Curve contract could be put into a partially-modified state, and...

Calls to get_virtual_price() are vulnerable to read-only reentrancy

Lines of code 117 Vulnerability details getvirtualprice was originally considered to be a manipulation-resistant price - suitable as a price oracle, but it was later found to be vulnerable to a read-only reentrancy attack, where the Curve contract could be put into a partially-modified state, and...

Using block.timestamp as the deadline/expiry invites MEV

Lines of code 307 Vulnerability details Passing block.timestamp as the expiry/deadline of an operation does not mean "require immediate execution" - it means "whatever block this transaction appears in, I'm comfortable with that block's timestamp". Providing this value means that a malicious mine...

Unwrap Fee Rounding Down: Revenue Loss, User Unfairness, and Reduced Confidence

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The issue with the unwrap fee rounding down can have several detrimental impacts on the Ocean protocol: 1. Revenue Loss: Due to rounding down, the contract loses out on potential unwrap fees, particularly for smaller unwrap amounts. This can significantl...

doInteraction() won't mint tokens to user if interaction.specifiedAmount less than 10**12 and has certain conditions

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact If the user calls doInteraction and executes Interaction with specifiedAmount less than 10 12 and a big difference in token decimals, the user won't get any tokens. Proof of Concept Core external functions like doInteraction will call the internal...

Users can unwrap assets in batches and avoid paying fees to protocol

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Users can unwrap their assets from The Ocean and evade paying fees to the protocol when the requested amount is smaller than the fee divisor. This happens due to a truncation of the result in the fee calculation. Proof of Concept This affects the...

Calls to get_virtual_price() are vulnerable to read-only reentrancy

Lines of code 117 Vulnerability details getvirtualprice was originally considered to be a manipulation-resistant price - suitable as a price oracle, but it was later found to be vulnerable to a read-only reentrancy attack, where the Curve contract could be put into a partially-modified state, and...

Intrinsic arbitrage between assets due to price feed deviation threshold

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Withdrawals have not yet been implemented but I assume it will be implemented in the usual way such that the fraction of total supply of rsETH a user redeems gives him an equal fraction of total assets held, i.e. received = sharesToRedeem totalAssets /...

All contributions can get locked in the Crowdfund contract, with no means to refund users or finalize.

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact ETHCrowdfundBasefinalize assumes that all contributions are intact, but there is an emergencyExecute function that is capable of spending part of crowdfund eth. If as little as one wei gets spent, Users cannot get refunded, and the Crowdfund will not get...

DoS of the staking functionality due to the check of minimum total supply

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The StakedUSDe contract can be accidentally blocked if the all shares will be redeemed before the VESTINGPERIOD end. The checkMinShares function will then revert for any eligible deposits. The same result will be in case of asset transferring to the...

Sanction Bypass Through Depositing to Authorized Borrower's Market

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Wildcat protocol provides lending with lender backed collateral considered as reserves and the ratio must be upheld by the borrower. The protocol team has taken certain steps to prevent interaction with sanctioned users. However, sanction status is only...

Assembly proxy creation lacks bytecode validation, enabling arbitrary contract deployment.

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The proxy contract creation uses assembly to compute the create2 address. But it does not verify the deployed bytecode matches expectations. The use of assemble for proxy contract creation has potential risks if the bytecode is not validated. This could...

THE RETURN BOOLEAN VALUE OF THE excessivelySafeCall FUNCTION IS NOT CHECKED IN THE BranchBridgeAgent.lzReceive FUNCTION

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The BranchBridgeAgent.lzReceive function is used to send cross-chain messages using the layer zero messaging layer. The lzReceive function uses the excessivelySafeCall library on the same contract address addressthis to ensure the layer zero cross chain...

if lzReceiveNonBlocking failed to execute , they don't send back ,accumulated msg.value . malicious user drain that

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact PerformFallBack is gonna fail and msg.value will be accumulated in that BranchBridgeAgent and malicious user can take over them Proof of Concept User deposited and When it's not executed ,user want to retrieve and callRetrieveSettlement ,send message to...

Irrevocable token holders can instantly mint a revocable token after burning and bypass the minimum XVS stake for revocable tokens

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact When an irrevocable token is burned by the admin, the holder should go through the 90 day staking period again before accruing rewards. However, the holder can exploit the protocol to immediately begin accruing rewards after burning. Furthermore, the...

Allowing price updates once in an epoch is extremely risky and open windows to a lot of issues

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Protocol currently knows about how this could be an effect, since the comments to both previewDeposit and convertToShares suggest that any difference attached to this should be considered slippage, but measures are not taken to ensure that this slippage ...

Missing balance checks in _reserveTokenSpecified()

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact There is a missing balance check in reserveTokenSpecified, which allows reserve tokens to be withdrawn or deposited into illegal balances, which may cause subsequent transactions to revert. It also allows the pool to be killed by withdrawing all balances...

Lack of events in EvolvingProteus contract

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact There is no event emitted in the whole contract, even after executing sensitive actions like swaps between assets or at the constructor. That is bad because many automatic tools that monitors the contracts deployed rely on them. For example, see the swap...

The treasury address can be updated by the contract owner to point to a malicious address after deployment

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Any fees or funds sent to the treasury could potentially be stolen or manipulated Proof of Concept The treasury address can be updated by the contract owner to point to a malicious address after deployment. This presents a risk as the treasury receives a...

The USDOMarketModule contract's lend function allows for dangerous call delegation

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The USDOMarketModule contract is a module that is used by the BaseUSDO contract to facilitate functionality for market actions. The module functionality is invoked through the invocation of a delegatecall within the BaseUSDO contract's executeModule...

Upgraded Q -> 2 from #327 [1686724891862]

Judge has assessed an item in Issue 327 as 2 risk. The relevant finding follows: L-04 addBid does not increment the endBlock of the auction when it is close to the end, preventing the protocol from capturing extra value When an Auction is created, it sets a lotItem.endBlock. This value remains...

Technically the seven days period is not guaranteed and it's possible for the challenger to delete a withdrawal even if it hasn't been challenged during the seven days

Lines of code Vulnerability details Proof of Concept There's an existing logic to prevent the CHALLENGER from deleting a l2Output after the finalization period has ended. This is done to prevent having user withdrawals blocked after the finalization period has elapsed without challenges. The...

NodeOperator will steal other NodeOperators' validators through frontrunning

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact People that want to earn staking rewards, but do not have the resources to run validators, will see Stader as an avenue where they can easily steal and use others validators and they will actually earn Operator rewards from Stader. This could lead to two...

First 1 wei deposit can produce lose of user xETH funds in wxETH

Lines of code Vulnerability details Description The present implementation of the wxETH::stake functions permits the sending of tokens to the contract, even if the quantity of wxETH is zero. This can result in users losing funds, particularly when the initial deposit is only 1 wei, and the extent...

When borrowRateMantissa is higher than the limit value, VToken contract will be DOS

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact File: VToken.sol 678 function accrueInterest public virtual override returns uint256 --skip-- 695 uint256 borrowRateMantissa = interestRateModel.getBorrowRatecashPrior, borrowsPrior, reservesPrior; 696 requireborrowRateMantissa borrowRateMaxMantissa. Thi...

Division by Zero Vulnerability in _calculateNewRewards function.

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The calculateNewRewards function in the smart contract performs a division operation with totalInterestEarnedInPeriod, which could be zero, but there is a problem that can result in a division-by-zero error, causing the smart contract to behave...

Mitigation Confirmed for H-06

MITIGATION IS NOT CONFIRMED MITIGATION IS NOT CONFIRMED Mitigation of H-06: Issue not mitigated Link to Issue: code-423n4/2023-03-asymmetry-findings588 Comments Issue H-06 describes the potential problems of assuming a peg of stETH to ETH. The sponsor proposed a mitigation to fetch the price of...

Default accounts cannot pay transaction fees due to DefaultAccount not calling MsgValueSimulator

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Default accounts cannot pay the transaction fees to the bootloader. It's not clear whether the attempts to do so will silently succeed or revert because the behaviour of the CALL opcode in the zkSync Era virtual machine isn't explained in the description...

Incorrect totalSupply() function design

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact In ERC1155Enumerable.solL36-L37 line, totalsuppyl of ERC1155 is calculated packages/v2-token/src/base/ERC1155Enumerable.sol: 34 35: /// @inheritdoc IERC1155Enumerable 36: function totalSupply public view override returns uint256 37: return...

Buyers unused ETH funds can be stolen (Direct theft of funds)

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The protocol has recognized the need to track buyers ETH in order to refund unused ETH by implementing the returnDust function and setupExecution modifier. The implementation creates an attack vector that allows the seller to steal the unused ETH...

Weak randomness

Lines of code Vulnerability details Vulnerability details Description In the function crossChainMessage of HolographOperator contract there is the following logic implemented for the calculation of the random value: / @dev use job hash, job nonce, block number, and block timestamp for generating ...

Fee on transfer tokens can make users receive less than they are supposed to

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Some tokens take a transfer fee e.g. STA, PAXG. Tokens like these will be supported because the vested amount will be the amount that was actually transferred i.e. the balance of the contract after the transfer, but it will cause the user to receive less...