The owner is a single point of failure and a centralization risk

Lines of code 56, 109, 127, 172, 219, 250, 115, 131, 154, 116, 131https://github.com/Tapioca-DAO/tapiocaz-audit/blob/bcf61f79464cfdc0484aa272f9f6e28d...

latestAnswer() may return stale values

Lines of code 121, 122, 123, 124, 51 Vulnerability details Impact latestAnswer only returns the latest answer or zero, and thus there is no way to tell whether the value is stale or not. Use latestRoundData instead, and check whether the latest timestamp is within your protocol's limits. File:...

Sandwich attack on buy()

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Function Market:buy does not check or take in a minimum buy amount. This makes users' funds vulnerable to sandwich attacks. buy will increase shareDataid.tokenCount, and thus change the exchange rate of share price. price, fee =...

latestRoundData recommendation does not have consideration for stale price

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The issue is highlighted in the bot L-2 finding but fail to highlight the importance for checking stale price. The ChainlinkPriceOracle when calls out to a Chainlink oracle receiving using the recommended latestRoundData it can get stale price, if there ...

Missing pause checks in LRTOracle

Lines of code Vulnerability details Summary The LRTOracle oracle provides functionality to pause the contract but no restrictions are applied when the contract is in a paused state. Impact Similar to the other contracts in the protocol, the LRTOracle contract offers pausing functionality: 101: //...

Users could game oracle price deviation

Lines of code Vulnerability details Summary Prices returned from Chainlink oracles have different conditions to update the reported values, which can be abused by Impact Prices for the different LST assets supported in the Kelp protocol are obtained from a Chainlink oracle. The data feeds for eac...

No way to withdraw from the strategy

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact NodeDelegator does not have any functions to withdraw the underlying from the strategy. It does have a function to transfer ERC-20 tokens to the LRTDepositPool, assuming the eigen layer strategy mints ERC20 tokens to represent the share of invested funds...

payable.transfer() call will result in loss of unused Ether

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact batchContribute function carries out funding and transfer in batches by using the payable.transfer call. This is unsafe as transfer has hard coded gas budget and can fail when the user is a smart contract. This way programmatical usage of batchContribute...

Stale preciousListHash state variable permanently prevents a party from executing non-unanimous arbitrary call proposals and poses a high security risk.

Lines of code Vulnerability details Overview of the execute function in PartyGovernance Before diving into the details of the vulnerability, I need to explain how the execute function works in the PartyGovernance.sol contract. The execute is the function responsible for executing a proposal after...

No validation for the partyFactory contract !

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Malicious party contract can be deployed ! Proof of Concept Party contracts are created by the proxyFactory contract . In the initialize function , the proxyFactory contract address is provided by the user which may bring catastrophic consequences . This...

Compromised minter can change route to misdirect user funds

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The current security assumption revolves around the compromise of a minter, wherein they mint 200k USDe tokens for themselves and subsequently redeem them within the contract. Under this assumption, as long as the gatekeeper key remains secure, the minte...

Manipulation of NFV can trick it's buyer to have it on unexpected condition.

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact NFV can be sold at a price not expected by the user or may be susceptible to liquidation shortly after buying it. Proof of Concept openSAFE function in ODSafeManager is supposed to be called by the ODProxy and mints nft for it, furthermore it calls...

Missing functionality required to allow others access to safe

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Missing functionality prevents ODProxy from granting other accounts access to the safe. In order to grant access to the particular safe for which specific instance of ODProxy is the owner, it is necessary to call allowSAFE on ODSafeManager. This method...

checkAfterExecution() function has a design flaw

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact checkAfterExecution function has a design flaw. It may cause some danger problem, such as ,signers can change the threshold of the vault, giving themselves increased control over future transactions and breaking an important trust assumption of the...

DoS issue presented in Brahma's latest audit still has potential control flow paths that can lead to same vulnerability

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Detailed description of the impact of this finding. Proof of Concept Following the "ConsoleAccount execTransaction" flow outlined via Brahma's Architecture diagram, as we can see: calling execTransaction calls checkTransaction function on...

Zero address Salt used in Creating delegate contract

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact A zero-valued salt used, means an attacker can predict the contract address of a new delegate, this can lead an attacker to create the ERC20ProxyDelegator on behalf of the user, this is to allow for max access to the tokens to be transfered Proof of...

Possibility of losing users funds due to not checking for zero address (address 0x0)

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact As there is no function for checking whether the addresses of the sources and targets are zero or not in the delegateMulti function it may cause issues for users Sending tokens to a zero address address 0x0 is generally not a recommended practice in...

if the Virtual Account's owner is a Contract Account (multisig wallet), attackers can gain control of the Virtual Accounts by gaining control of the same owner's address in a different chain

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Attackers can gain control of User's Virtual Accounts and steal all the assets these accounts hold in the Root environment Proof of Concept When sending signed messages from a Branch to Root, the RootBridgeAgent contract calls the...

Race condition on timeWeightedWeeklyGlobalConcLiquidityLastSet_ can lead to incorrect rewards.

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact timeWeightedWeeklyGlobalConcLiquidityLastSet is read and written in multiple functions. If two transactions call at similar times, the state updates could overwrite each other. The timeWeightedWeeklyGlobalConcLiquidityLastSet state variable is used in...

No poolIdx validation; arbitrary values can corrupt storage, require validation.

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact No validation on poolIdx input for key functions like claimConcentratedRewards. Could pass invalid poolId and corrupt storage. The claimConcentratedRewards function is defined on LiquidityMining.sol. It takes in a poolIdx as one of the parameters functio...

No access control on protocolCmd and userCmd; potential for abuse.

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact There is no access control on the protocolCmd and userCmd functions in LiquidityMiningPath. This means anyone can call them. There should be some checks to restrict access. The protocolCmd and userCmd functions are defined on LiquidityMiningPath.sol: /...

Incorrect srcAddress check renders all layerzero messages unusable

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The source address of LayerZero messages is validated on a wrong part of the calldata, which will cause all cross-chain-messages to fail on a live deployment. Proof of Concept The receivers of cross-chain-messages BranchBridgeAgent and RootBridgeAgent bo...

functions in FixedMath.sol directly converting uint256 arguments to int256 which may overflow

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact functions in FixedMath.sol directly converting uint256 arguments to int256 which may overflow or return unexpected values Proof of Concept functions in FixedMath.sol like uintDiv , uintMul , toFixed directly converting its arguments from uint256 to int25...

Lack of Input Validation

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Neither function appears to validate the length of the users array, which opens the door for misuse or unexpected behavior. Proof of Concept A user can pass an empty array or an exceedingly large array to disrupt expected behavior. Tools Used Manual code...

Lack of access control and value validation in the reward flow exposes functions to public access

Lines of code Vulnerability details Summary Some functions that are part of the Votium reward flow are left unprotected and can be accessed by anyone to spend resources held by the contract. Impact Rewards coming from the Votium protocol are claimed and compounded back in AfEth. This flow consist...

cvxPerVotium() calculation will return zero if all CVX tokens are pending withdrawal as obligations

Lines of code Vulnerability details Summary The implementation of cvxPerVotium contains an edge case that causes it to return an invalid zero value price. Impact The cvxPerVotium function present in the VotingStrategy contract is used to measure the number of held CVX tokens per vAfEth. 144:...

VotiumStrategyCore.applyRewards can be sandwhiched to make profit

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact VotiumStrategyCore.applyRewards can be sandwhiched to make profit. Proof of Concept VotiumStrategyCore.applyRewards function will swap all rewards of contract into eth and then stake them into safEth or vEth contract. As result price of afEth token will...

No gas payment is done before calling the callContract in the Router.sol

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact In the Axelar documentation it is specified that before calling callContract or callContractWithToken the user needs to first prepay the relayers gas fee on the source chain, but since the functions are not payable, nor does call...

Not enough valid checks in the Factory.sol

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The LiquidityPoolFactory contract is used to deploy LiquidityPools through a controlled newLiquidityPool , however a vital check is omitted. The newLiquidityPool is first called in the PoolManager.sol but it is not restricted to just that, it can also be...

GeVault LP calculations do not use scaling and are vulnerable to deposit attacks

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Currently, getTVL counts all token balances in GeVault, and attackers can manipulate getTVL to implement deposit attacks. Secondly, since the calculation of LP does not use scaling, because there is a precision error in the division, the cost for the...

yryryserywretsh

Lines of code L1 Vulnerability details Impact Detailed description of the impact of this finding. Proof of Concept Provide direct links to all referenced code in GitHub. Add screenshots, logs, or any other relevant proof that illustrates the concept. Tools Used Recommended Mitigation Steps Assess...

Potential Out of Bound Error When Accessing Range Array

Lines of code Vulnerability details The code seems to be attempting to access an element of the 'ranges' array using an index calculated from the array's length minus one. However, during the deployment or initialization of the contract, if the length of 'ranges' is 1, this calculation results in...

Rounding in the unwrap function in rUSDY may cause fund loss for users.

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Rouding with BPSDENOMINATOR in function unwrap in rUSDY.sol may cause users to be transfered back less than expected USDY. POC The rUSDY.sol contract provides a way to wrap an amount of USDY as shares in order to gain profit in rUSDY. This is done throug...

New from fees rework: fees can still be stolen with a flash-loan on GeVault

Lines of code Vulnerability details The TokenisableRange fees have been reworked to be sent to the corresponding GeVault instance This fixed the problems with fee accounting in TokenisableRange but created a new, similar one in GeVault, where the deposit function does not count the fees in the...

Tokens transferred with bridge can get lost if destination transaction can’t be executed

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact User could lost his tokens, if tx on destination chain will failrevert. There is no option to recover the tokens on source chain. Revert could be cause by function attachThreshold. This function finds the correspondence between the amount and threshhold...

guardian multisig should be timelock

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Per the rUSDYFactory.sol, The Natspec states the guardian address is a multsig address which will be passed in constructor during deployement of factory contract. @notice guardian address in constructor is a msig. and constructoraddress guardian guardian...

You can front-run to enrich yourself

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact An attacker can use flash loan and withdraw significant part of funding intended for collateral providers. Proof of Concept Let's consider code snippet from deposit: requireshares = previewDepositassets != 0, "ZEROSHARES";...

Lose due to rounding. Use more precise library for mathematical operations

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The mulDivDown function, assumed to be from FixedPointMathLib, is likely designed to multiply two numbers and then divide the result, rounding down any remainders. This rounding down can result in minor discrepancies when converting between assets and...

Regular bonding incorrectly purchases a reduced amount of Put options due to discount

Lines of code Vulnerability details During rDPX bonding, rdpxV2Core will purchase put options for the rDPX that are used for minting DPXETH. This is for hedging against rDPX price drop to protect the DPXETH peg. The amount of put options to purchase is equivalent to the amount of rDPX that are us...

Improper precision of strike price calculation can result in broken protocol

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Due to a lack of adequate precision, the calculated strike price for a PUT option for rDPX is not guaranteed to be 25% OTM, which breaks core assumptions around 1 protecting downside price movement of the rDPX which makes up part of the collateral for...

totalWethDelegated does not decrease in withdraw can cause DOS

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The accounting for total weth delegated increases when adding, but not withdrawing. This allows anyone to inflate this value by repeatedly adding and withdrawing. This again will cause DOS of the bonding mechanism. Proof of Concept RdpxV2Core.addToDelega...

Division before multiplication incurs larger precision loss

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact There are couple of instance of using result of a division for multiplication while can cause larger precision loss. Proof of Concept In contract EvolvingProteus.sol, value of int128 two at line 709 is calculated by using ABDKMath64x64.divu function. The...

Loss of precision due to division occurring before multiplication across multiple statements leads to lesser number of receiving tokens

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Swaps and Deposits work with two tokens X and Y. The computed amount of tokens on the receiving end decrease due to this multi-statement loss of precision occurring due to division before multiplication. Note: This finding is different from the L-06 bot...

Rounding Issue and Inconsistent Fee Application

Lines of code Vulnerability details Summary There is a bug in the swap function. The bug can potentially cause incorrect balance checks and outputs when swapping. This issue arises due to improper usage of the applyFeeByRounding function. Affected Function: swap Details: In the swap function, the...

Double voting in GaugeController

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Voting with the same collateral multiple times by delegating and undelegating, a process that could manipulatively influenceincrease the weight of a particular lending market where the malicious actor is the major Liquidity provider. Proof of Concept The...

GaugeController.remove_gauge() may indefinitely trap user voting power

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Users will permanently lose voting power equal to their power used to vote in the removed gauge unless the gauge is re-added and users re-vote to remove their voting power from the gauge. Proof of Concept GaugeController.sol does not have any function fo...

the claim function may underFlow when it calculate the claimEnd

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact in the claim function there is possibility of the underflow which lead the transaction to revert, the function may underflow in this line uint256 claimEnd = Math.mincurrEpoch - WEEK, claimUpToTimestamp because the currEpoch will return the current epoch...

The upgrade executor is granted the canceller role instead of the new emergency security council.

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact In L1SCMgmtActivationAction.sol, the perform function is not granting role to the new emergency security council. It instead grants it to the upgrade executor. This logic doesn't align with the function inline comment and can prevent the perform function...

DEPRECATED POOLS CAN BE USED IN THE CRITICAL TRANSACTION EXECUTIONS OF THE OptionsPositionManager CONTRACT

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The PositionManager.getPoolAddresses function is used to get the important address details of the RoePool to be used in the critical function executions of the OptionsPositionManager contract such as executeBuyOptions, executeLiquidation,...

Missing check for equal length arrays in executeOperation().

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The executeOperation function in the OptionsPositionManager contract doesn't check if the lengths of the arrays submitted are equal. This can lead to unexpected operations. Proof of Concept In the OptionsPositionManager contract, the executeOperation...