10190 matches found
Initial pool deposit can be stolen
Handle cmichel Vulnerability details Note that the PoolTemplate.initialize function, called when creating a market with Factory.createMarket, calls a vault function to transfer an initial deposit amount conditions1 from the initial depositor references4: // PoolTemplate function initialize string...
approve() function does not require that _token and _spender args are unique
Handle jayjonah8 Vulnerability details Impact In L1Escrow.sol the approve function takes in a token to approve the spender to be able to spend but does not check that the token and spender are different addresses which can leave the protocol open to be expo;ited. Proof of Concept function approve...
No slippage protection on _swapUstToUnderlying can lead to lost funds
Handle harleythedog Vulnerability details Impact The function swapUstToUnderlying exists to swap Ust to underlying tokens. The last argument to exchangeunderlying is mindy, which specifies the minimum number of underlying to be returned from the swap. Currently, this value is set to 0, so the...
investedAssets ignores fees and can cause insolvency
Handle danb Vulnerability details investedAssets doesn't substract the fees owed to the treasury, this makes the system think that it has more than it really has. Proof of Concept consider the following scenario: perfFeePct is 20%. the system generated 1M dollars yield in aust that it didn't rede...
Dashboard is not working , lend positiona are still loading, the same is for Lend button, Lend Amount to lend is not refresjing
Handle 0v3rf10w Vulnerability details Impact Detailed description of the impact of this finding. Proof of Concept Provide direct links to all referenced code in GitHub. Add screenshots, logs, or any other relevant proof that illustrates the concept. Tools Used Recommended Mitigation Steps --- The...
_mint721() function can be broken because of strict equality check on token balance
Handle jayjonah8 Vulnerability details Impact In NFTXMarketplaceZap.sol the mint721 function has a require check that the balance must be equal to the amount of vault tokens in the contract. uint256 balance = count BASE - count INFTXVaultvault.mintFee; requirebalance ==...
Basket.sol#publishNewIndex() Lack of input validation may cause fund loss to anyone who bonds an auction
Handle WatchPug Vulnerability details According to the newRatio formula in settleAuction, the maximum value of newRatio is factory.auctionMultiplier basket.ibRatio. However, since there is no validation for the value of minIbRatio when setting it, if the publisher publishes a newIndex with...
Governor can steal funds from vaults
Handle 0x0x0x Vulnerability details reclaimTokens function is as follows function reclaimTokensaddress to, address memory tokens external nonReentrant requirenft 0, ExceptionsLibrary.INITIALIZATION; IProtocolGovernance governance = vaultGovernance.internalParams.protocolGovernance; bool...
splitReinvest() can be front run
Handle WatchPug Vulnerability details function splitReinvestuint256 rewardLiquidity external retrieveRewardrewardLiquidity; uint256 rewardBalance = rewardToken.balanceOfaddressthis; rewardToken.safeTransferaddressdexHandler, rewardBalance.div2; dexHandler.buyMalt; bondAccountmsg.sender; emit...
Wrong design/implementation of freeTrial allows attacker to steal funds from the protocol
Handle WatchPug Vulnerability details The current design/implementation of freeTrial allows users to get full refund before the freeTrial ends. Plus, a user can transfer partial of thier time to another user using shareKey. This makes it possible for the attacker to steal from the protocol by...
MEV miner can mint larger than expected UDT total supply
Handle elprofesor Vulnerability details Impact UnlockProtocol attempts to calculate gas reimbursement using tx.gasprice, typically users who falsify tx.gasprice would lose gas to miners and therefore not obtain any advantage over the protocol itself. This does present capabilities for miners to...
TWAPOracle might register with wrong token order
Handle cmichel Vulnerability details The TWAPOracle.registerPair function takes in a factory and token0, token1. The function accepts a factory argument which means any Uniswap-like factory can be used. When using the actual Uniswap factory's IUniswapV2Factoryfactory.getPairtoken0, token1 call, i...
FSDVesting: Claiming tributes should call FSD token's corresponding functions
Handle hickuphh3 Vulnerability details Impact The claiming of staking and governance tributes for the a beneficiary's vested tokens should be no different than other users / EOAs. However, the claimTribute and claimGovernanceTribute are missing the actual claiming calls to the corresponding...
Unchecked low level calls
Handle Reigada Vulnerability details Impact The return value of these low-level calls are not checked, so if the call fails, the Ether will be locked in the contract. Setting the risk as medium as the smart contract has no function to withdraw the Ether. This Ether would remain stuck in the...
Trades where toToken is feeOnTransferToken might send user less tokens than finalAmountMin
Handle kenzo Vulnerability details Slingshot's executeTrades checks that the trade result amount to be sent to the user is bigger than finalAmountMin, and after that sends the user the amount. But if the token charges fee on transfer, the final transfer to the user will decrease the amount the us...
Contract Selfdestruct via delegatecall
Handle elprofesor Vulnerability details Impact Using a malicious Module the ModuleRegistry admin can trigger a selfdestruct via delegate call in the Executioner.sol contract. ModuleRegistry and Executioner separate the logic between ModuleRegistry.sol admin and systems admin. Executioner.sol reli...
Rebalance will fail due to low precision of percentages
Handle cmichel Vulnerability details The AssetManager.rebalance function has a check at the end to ensure that all tokens are deposited again: requiretoken.balanceOfaddressthis == 0, "AssetManager: there are remaining funds in the fund pool"; The idea is that the last market deposits all...
Basket becomes unusable if everybody burns their shares
Handle kenzo Vulnerability details While handling the fees, the contract calculates the new ibRatio by dividing by totalSupply. This can be 0 leading to a division by 0. Impact If everybody burns their shares, in the next mint, totalSupply will be 0, handleFees will revert, and so nobody will be...
Setting Factory.bondPercentDiv to zero cause Denial of Service in Auction.bondForRebalance()
Handle pants Vulnerability details The function Factory.setBondPercentDiv allows the owner to set the state variable Factory.bondPercentDiv to zero. Impact If Factory.bondPercentDiv equals zero then the function Auction.bondForRebalance will always revert due to a division by zero: bondAmount =...
unchecked return value from Transfer/TransferFrom()
Handle JMukesh Vulnerability details Impact The ERC20.transfer and ERC20.transferFrom functions return a boolean value indicating success. This parameter needs to be checked for success. Some tokens do not revert if the transfer failed but return false instead. Proof of Concept Tools Used manual...
Erc20.transfer() return value is ignored
Handle pants Vulnerability details According to the ERC-20 Token Standard, the function transfer returns false on failure. However, the return value of Erc20.transfer is ignored 8 times: 1. In Swivel.exitVaultFillingZcTokenExit, line 313. 2. In Swivel.exitVaultFillingZcTokenExit, line 315. 3. In...
Incorrect timing
Handle goatbug Vulnerability details Impact uint256 public constant TIMELOCKDURATION = 4 60 24; // 1 day This is not one day. 4 60 24 != 86400 where 86400 is seconds in a day. Proof of Concept Incorrect timelocks in both the basket and factory can allow parameters to be modified quicker than...
Reentrancy in settleAuction(): malicious publisher can bypass index timelock mechanism, inject malicious index, and rug the basket
Handle kenzo Vulnerability details The settleAuction function calls withdrawBounty before setting auctionOngoing = false, thereby allowing reentrancy. Impact A malicious publisher can bypass the index timelock mechanism and publish new index which the basket's users won't have time to respond to...
YAxisVotePower.balanceOf can be manipulated
Handle cmichel Vulnerability details The YAxisVotePower.balanceOf contract uses the Uniswap pool reserves to compute a lpStakingYax reward: uint256 yaxReserves,, = yaxisEthUniswapV2Pair.getReserves; int256 lpStakingYax = yaxReserves .mulstakeAmount .divsupply .addrewardsYaxisEth.earnedvoter; The...
use of transfer() instead of call() to send eth
Handle JMukesh Vulnerability details Impact Use of transfer might render ETH impossible to withdraw becuase after istanbul hardfork , there is increases in the gas cost of the SLOAD operation and therefore breaks some existing smart contracts.Those contracts will break because their fallback...
No safety check in addToken
Handle jonah1005 Vulnerability details Impact There's no safety check in Manager.sol addToken. There are two possible cases that might happen. 1. One token being added twice in a Vault. Token would be counted doubly in the vault. Ref: Vault.solL293-L303. There would be two item in the array when...
Attackers can force liquidations by borrowing large amounts of an asset.
Handle tensors Vulnerability details Impact Consider an attacker who borrows enough to greatly increase the oracle rate. It is claimed that arbitrageurs will come in a fix this discrepancy before the attacker has a chance to profit off of his price manipulation: "Over the next 1 hour, the effect ...
Rewards accumaulated can stay constant and oftern not increment
Handle moose-code Vulnerability details Impact rewardsPerToken.accumulated can stay constant while rewardsPerToken.lastUpdated is continually updated, leading to no actual rewards being distributed. I.e. No rewards accumulate. Proof of Concept Line 115, rewardsPerToken.accumulated could stay...
Single-step process for critical ownership transfer/renounce is risky
Handle 0xRajeev Vulnerability details Impact The SwappableYieldSource allows owners and asset managers to set/swap/transfer yield sources/funds. As such, the contract ownership plays a critical role in the protocol. Given that AssetManager is derived from Ownable, the ownership management of this...
Unused/Incorrect onlyDAO modifier could be an indication of missing access control
Handle 0xRajeev Vulnerability details Impact Unused/incorrect access control modifier is typically an indication of missing critical authorization checks. The onlyDAO modifier used in various protocol contracts is present in Synth.sol but unused in any of the contract functions and is also...
[Pool] - Flash loan + Synth.realise allows anyone to extract value from LPs
Handle adelamo Vulnerability details Impact On Synth.sol, we have the method realise that checks if the LP value is higher than the Synth value. If confirmed, it will burn the premium LP. Using a flash loan, we can add liquidity to the pool, mint some LP tokens. Then, call realise using the pool...
User can redeem more tokens by artificially increasing the chi accrual
Handle shw Vulnerability details Impact A user can artificially increase the chi accrual after maturity by flash borrow on Compound, which affects the exchange rate used by the chi oracle. As a result, the user redeems more underlying tokens with the same amount of fyTokens since the accrual is...
auth collision possible
Handle gpersoon Vulnerability details Impact The auth mechanism of AccessControl.sol uses function selectors msg.sig as a unique role definition. Also the moduleCall allows the code to be extended. Suppose an attacker wants to add the innocent looking function "leftbranchblockuint32" in an new...
A malicious receiver can cause another receiver to lose out on distributed fees by returning false for tokensReceived when receiveRewards is called on their receiver contract.
Handle janbro Vulnerability details Summary A malicious receiver can cause another receiver to lose out on distributed fees by returning false for tokensReceived when receiveRewards is called on their receiver contract. Risk Rating Medium Vulnerability Details A malicious receiver can cause anoth...
An attacker can cause an overflow in the flashLoan function
Handle janbro Vulnerability details Summary An attacker can cause an overflow in the flashLoan function where 0 tokens are burned after a large amount of tokens are minted, if there is a flash loan fee, due to not utilizing safe math. Risk Rating Critical Vulnerability Details An attacker can cra...
wLp tokens could be stolen
Lines of code Vulnerability details PosManagerremoveCollateralWLpTo function allows users to remove collateral wrapped in a wLp token that was previously supplied to the protocol: File: PosManager.sol 249: function removeCollateralWLpTouint posId, address wLp, uint tokenId, uint amt, address...
Signature Verification for batchVoteForManyWithSig Function
Lines of code Vulnerability details Potential Risk: The batchVoteForManyWithSig function in the CultureIndex contract allows multiple users to execute a batch of votes using provided signatures. While it attempts to verify the signatures, there are potential risks associated with signature...
collectLiquidity() Lack of can specify recipient leads to inability to retrieve token1 after entering the blacklist of token0
Lines of code Vulnerability details Vulnerability details LP has only one way to retrieve token, first decreaseLiquidity, then retrieve through the collectLiquidity method. collectLiquidity only has one parameter, tokenId. function collectLiquidity uint256 tokenId external override nonReentrant...
Validate Creators Array
Lines of code Vulnerability details Potential Risk: The validateCreatorsArray function in the CreatorUtils contract performs input validation for the creatorArray parameter, which is an array of CreatorBps structs. While the function checks the individual elements of the array for valid addresses...
Unchecked return value of low-level call()/delegatecall()
Lines of code 120, 141, 411, 184, 160, 189, 152, 444, 625, 638https://github.com/Tapioca-DAO/tapioca-bar-audit/blob/2286f80f928f41c8bc189d0657d74ba83286c668/contract...
bad debt is not socialized
Lines of code Vulnerability details Proof of Concept In case if borrower's position is unhealthy, then he can be liquidated. Liquidator can provide amount of shares in poolToRepay that he will cover and expects to get back poolOut shares. It is possible that position created a bad debt. This mean...
addRewardToken() does note remove old entries before adding new ones
Lines of code 455, 280, 378, 411 Vulnerability details Each time addRewardToken is called, new entries are added to the array, but doing so does not remove any old entries. By calling the function multiple times, an attacker can can increase their voting power indefinitely, without having to...
Some tokens may revert when zero value transfers are made
Lines of code 356, 371, 145, 272, 252, 116, 445, 374, 506, 488https://github.com/Tapioca-DAO/tap-token-audit/blob/59749be5bc2286f0bdbf59d7ddc258ddafd49a9f/contracts/options/TapiocaOptionBroker...
Unchecked return value of low-level call()/delegatecall()
Lines of code 120, 141, 411, 184, 160, 189, 152, 444, 625, 638https://github.com/Tapioca-DAO/tapioca-bar-audit/blob/2286f80f928f41c8bc189d0657d74ba83286c668/contract...
_doMultipleInteractions - User can use more wrapped tokens than they own
Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact User can use more wrapped tokens than they own. Proof of Concept When wrapped tokens are used by an Adaptor or Primitive through computeOutputAmount, it does not check if the user has enough tokens. Therefore, when calling computeOutputAmount, you need t...
Withdraws will be bricked if the curve pool gets killed
Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Liquidity will be locked forever since there is no interface to remove it. Proof of Concept Curve pools have a killed parameter that allows an admin to kill the pool, suspend all deposits, swaps, and single token withdrawals, and then only allow for taki...
Reentrancy in mint function leads to various problems
Lines of code Mint function in minter contract: Mint function in core contract: Vulnerability details Bug Description When minting NFTs, users will using the mint function. This function will mint a NFT using the safeMint function. The problem is that this mint will be done before crucial variabl...
The protocol is susceptible to reentrancy attacks.
Lines of code Vulnerability details Reentrancy is a well know bug in smart contract and the protocol is not handling it, The safeMint function in ERC721 make a callback to the receiver checking if they can hold a nft, this can be used to a receiver to take control of the execution of the call. in...
Return values of approve() not checked
Lines of code 321, 215, 184, 450, 761, 217, 157, 234, 339, 386https://github.com/Tapioca-DAO/t...
Use of transferFrom() rather than safeTransferFrom() for NFTs in will lead to the loss of NFTs
Lines of code 230, 342, 514, 536 Vulnerability details Impact The EIP-721 standard says the following about transferFrom: /// @notice Transfer ownership of an NFT -- THE CALLER IS RESPONSIBLE /// TO CONFIRM THAT to IS CAPABLE OF RECEIVING NFTS OR ELSE /// THEY MAY BE PERMANENTLY LOST /// @dev...