Unverified Primitives

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Interacting with unverified or malicious Ocean primitives could result in loss of funds or incorrect computations. Proof of Concept Provide direct links to all referenced code in GitHub. Add screenshots, logs, or any other relevant proof that illustrates...

Core function of Ocean contract like doInteraction | doMultipleInteractions | forwardedDoInteraction may revert under certain conditions

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Core functions like doInteraction, forwardedDoInteraction, doMultipleInteractions, forwardedDoMultipleInteractions etc, will always revert under certain conditions due to overflow in calculations. Proof of Concept Core external functions like doInteracti...

latestAnswer() may return stale values

Lines of code 121, 122, 123, 124, 51 Vulnerability details latestAnswer only returns the latest answer or zero, and thus there is no way to tell whether the value is stale or not. Use latestRoundData instead, and check whether the latest timestamp is within your protocol's limits. File:...

asD creator's would not be able to claim interest accrued due to wrong calculations of the maximumWithdrawable

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Detailed description of the impact of this finding. The asD contract implement's withdrawCarry method, which calculates the accrued interest on the users NOTE deposit. The variable maximumWithdrawable gets interest accrued by the deposit by the...

Improper validation can cause fee error and loss of funds.

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact If the amount is equal to zero the fee will be equal to zero, there is no check for amount should not be equal to zero the condition passes, it will fetch bondingCurve address then calcutes the price from LinearBondindCurve.sol,fee = priceForOne amount...

Incorrect fee splitting logic

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The fee splitting logic does not properly attribute holder and creator rewards. By splitting fees from the total rather than incrementally, it distorts the proportional rewards earned over time. This could undermine the incentive structures and alignment...

Too small deposits will result in no rsEth mint for the

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact User will get nothing if the deposit amount is too small . Proof of Concept The getRsETHAmountToMint is for getting the conversion rate of asset to rsEth . /// @return rsethAmountToMint Amount of rseth to mint function getRsETHAmountToMint address asset,...

Upgraded Q -> 2 from #246 [1699029732469]

Judge has assessed an item in Issue 246 as 2 risk. The relevant finding follows: L-03 The tokenURI is not compatible with the ERC721 standard Description function tokenURIuint256 safeId public view override returns string memory uri uri = nftRenderer.rendersafeId; tokenURI will call nftRenderer...

Upgraded Q -> 2 from #221 [1699029747725]

Judge has assessed an item in Issue 221 as 2 risk. The relevant finding follows: L-02 Handling missing for case where ERC20 token has decimal 18 in CamelotRelayer & UniV3Relayer oracles Description In the constructor token decimals of an ERC20 is assumed to be = 18 which can be wrong for some...

TRANSFERING FUNDS TO YOURSELF INCREASES YOUR BALANCE

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact If transferred to yourself, it will cause your balance to increase, thus growing the token balance infinitely. Proof of Concept File: src/market/WildcatMarketToken.sol 54: transferfrom, to, amount; 74: accountsfrom = fromAccount; 78: accountsto =...

Sanctionned funds keep earning APR, and protocol earning fees on these funds

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact When a user is sanctioned, if he has a scaledBalance not in the withdrawal queue, calling the nukeFromOrbit function will send sanctioned funds to an escrow contract, and these funds will keep earning APR. This is because when a deposit is executed, the...

Front-running the Vault721.sol::build(address _user) can DoS the protocol for new users

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact New users can't register and use the protocol until they discover the deployed address of their proxy, which is detrimental to the protocol's reputation Proof of Concept Attackers/bots are able to DOS the protocol for the new users who wants to create...

OpenZeppelin 's recent v5.0.0 release includes many changes to libraries/contracts that can directly affect ERC20MultiDelegate functionality

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact OpenZeppelin just released v5.0.0, and there happen to be several significant changes that directly affect the ERC20MultiDelegate implementation, directly and indirectly, via packages used and inherited from. Here’s a link to the release: Below is a...

No check proxy contract is deployed

Lines of code Vulnerability details The deployProxyDelegatorIfNeeded function in ERC20MultiDelegate.sol does not verify that a proxy contract has been successfully deployed before emitting an event indicating its creation. Impact Both createProxyDelegatorAndTransfer and processDelegation function...

Event not emitted after sensitive action of setting new concentrated and ambient rewards.

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The 'setConcRewards' and 'setAmbRewards' doesn't emit event to to signify to all parties involved the new concentrated and ambient results. Proof of Concept A user not aware of new reward price might suppose he/she have been swindled upon realizing that...

M-05 MitigationConfirmed

Lines of code Vulnerability details In the previous implementation when stakingContract.totalAllocPoint = 0 stakingContract.withdraw and stakingContract.deposit will div 0 , revert This results in StargateRewardableWrapper no longer being able to execute StargateRewardableWrapper.withdraw The...

Relying on string comparisons to determine which parameter to update in the file() function is brittle and could lead to unintended consequences.

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact This can allow unintentionally changing sensitive state variables Proof of Concept The vulnerability arises because: file relies on a simple string comparison of the what parameter to determine which state variable to update. A developer could accidental...

Bonding WETH discounts can drain WETH reserves of RdpxV2Core contract to zero

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Depending on the reserves of rDPX, bonding discounts are given both on the rDPX and WETH collateral requirements for minting dpxETH. The bonding discounts for both rDPX and WETH portions are provided as rDPX which is taken from the treasury. The issue wi...

Lack of balance checks in the depositGivenInputAmount function

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Lack of balance checks in the depositGivenInputAmount function can lead to various unpredictable consequences due to the breach of requirement "The pool's ratio of y to x must be within the interval MINM, MAXM". Proof of Concept The depositGivenInputAmou...

H-05 Unmitigated

Lines of code Vulnerability details Issue not mitigated About the problem sponsor function allows caller to delegate his shares to the special address. In this case caller losses ability to win prizes. Previous version of code had sponsor function, which allowed to deposit funds on behalf of owne...

M-02 Unmitigated

Lines of code Vulnerability details Comments In the previous implementation a malicious user could set arbitrary vault hooks for afterClaimPrize and beforeClaimPrize that could be used to gas grief the claimer or cause other claims in the same call to fail by deliberately reverting Mitigation The...

SecurityCouncilMemberSyncAction : perform function can be continually DOSed which will prevent the valid update the members of the gnosis safe

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The securityCouncil update will be prevented by continuously calling the perform function. Since the function rely on the nonce value, this function can be continuously called and nonce value is updated. This would prevent the valid security council upda...

createLock, increaseAmount int128(int256(_value)) unsafe downcast can lead to asset loss

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Suppose users deposit more than typeint128.max value through createLock and increaseAmount, they may get less voting power and can't get the assets back. Proof of Concept The VotingEscrow.sol is forked from FIATDAO, but it seems don't consider a MEDIUM...

Unsafe typecasting can lead to tokens being locked in the contract

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact In the createLock function the amount is calculated by casting the uint256 value to int128 in an unsafe way. Specifically the locked.amount is calculated as: locked.amount += int128int256value; could result in a negative value for locked.amount. For...

balanceOf method can be manipulate to liquidated vault

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Deriving price from balanceOf can be manipulated to liquidate vault see example Attacker can provide ERC20 token to the vaultAsset and mint vault shares. The deposited tokens will then be withdrawn with having same shares in the vault. The shares then wi...

Malicious user can steal other user's deposits from Vault.sol

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact When the Vault.withdraw function is called, a maximum of typeuint96.max shares are being burnt subsequently: Vault.withdraw- Vault.withdraw- Vault.burn burns uint96shares, see Vault.sol line 1139. A malicious user can exploit this in the following way: 1...

Possible Front Running on the Permit function

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact It could cause damage to third parties who use the permit method for transferring the tokens. Proof of Concept The well contract extends the ERC20Permit.sol, which contains a permit function that allow users to transfer assets with signatures. / @dev...

Inflation attack in well

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The Well.sol contract is vulnerable to a first depositor attack allowing someone to directly send funds to the pool in order to obfuscate the totalSupply and steal funds from the subsequent depositor. Proof of Concept Below is how the attack can be carri...

Stealing excess tokens from other users by either front-running skim function or calling it before legitimate user

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact File /src/interfaces/IWell.sol comment's defines what the skim function is being responsible for: / @notice Sends excess tokens held by the Well to the recipient. @param recipient The address to send the tokens @return skimAmounts The amount of each toke...

Read-only reentrancy is possible

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The agToken might be minted wrongly as rewards due to the reentrancy attack. Proof of Concept There are redeem/swap logics in the transmuter contract and all functions don't have a nonReentrant modifier. So the typical reentrancy attack is possible durin...

In MulticallRootRouter.sol, approve function can fail for non standard ERC20 tokens like USDT

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Some tokens like USDT do not work when changing the allowance from an existing non-zero allowance value. For example Tether USDT’s approve function will revert if the current approval is not zero, to protect against front-running changes of approvals. Li...

Reactivated gauges have incorrect accounting for the last cycle’s rewards

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact reactivated gauges that previously had queued up rewards have a mismatch between their storedCycle and contract’s gaugeCycle state variable. Due to this mismatch, there is also a resulting issue with the accounting logic for its completed rewards: Proof ...

Lack of input validation

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact There is no input sanitizer implemented for the transfertypes.FungibleTokenPacketData data variable. Proof of Concept After "unmarshaling" the packet, which checks if there is an error, it is used right away without further checking the fields inside it,...

Potential risk of using swappedAmount in case of swap error

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact In case the swap operation failed, the module should continue as is with the erc20 conversion and finish the IBC transfer. This is the relevant part of the code that swallows the error: swappedAmount, err = k.coinswapKeeper.TradeInputForExactOutputctx,...

The Swap action will always fail if the value of the deposited IBC asset is less than the value of autoSwapThreshold Canto

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The Swap action will always fail if the value of the deposited IBC asset the value of autoSwapThreshold Canto. This is not a bug, but it's very inconvenient for users and makes the goal of the onboarding module fail. Let's asssume that: 1 Canto = 0.1 USD...

M-05 Unmitigated

Lines of code Vulnerability details The mitigation makes accrueDrip is disable until the totalSupply 0. But the lastReport blocknumber is not updated. So all the dripped rewards still are collected by the first staker when the drip modifier is called at the second time. Impact If wxETH drips when...

sell reward rTokens at low price because of skiping furnace.melt

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The reward rToken sent to RevenueTrader will be sold at a low price. RSR stakers will lose some of their profits. Proof of Concept RevenueTraderP1.manageToken function is used to launch auctions for any erc20 tokens sent to it. For the RevenueTrader of t...

Upgraded Q -> 3 from #240 [1686228527253]

Judge has assessed an item in Issue 240 as 3 risk. The relevant finding follows: L-01 --- The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: All reactions...

Borrower cannot stop loss when fungibility breaks

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact When the borrower cannot repay with NFT he will be forced to forsake his entire credit. This situation can be deliberately instigated by the lender. Proof of Concept A borrower can only leave his position by returning an NFT buyNftFromMarket or...

the blocksPerYear for the WhitePaperInterestRateModel is set incorrectly

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact the blocksPerYear is set to 2102400 in the WhitePaperInterestRateModel this should be equal to number of blocks per year that is assumed by the interest rate model, but the number of block is set incorrectly and it's not equal to block per year. Proof of...

VToken mint -- Inflation attack

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The token could be impacted by an inflation attack. Proof of Concept At present, vToken is still susceptible to the well-known ERC4626 'Inflation Attack'. This vulnerability allows the total asset count to be inflated by making donations. This means that...

Incorrect calculation of the remaining updatedRewards leads to possible underflow error

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact RewardsManage.sol keeps track of the total number of rewards collected per epoch for all pools: File: 2023-05-ajna\ajna-core\src\RewardsManager.sol 73: /// @dev epoch = rewards claimed mapping. 74: mappinguint256 = uint256 public override rewardsClaimed;...

Integer Overflow in executeExtraordinary Function.

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The executeExtraordinary function casts a uint128 value to a uint256 value, which could lead to an integer overflow vulnerability. An attacker can provide a large uint128 value that exceeds the maximum value for uint256, causing the value to overflow and...

Upgraded Q -> 2 from #49 [1683711003164]

Judge has assessed an item in Issue 49 as 2 risk. The relevant finding follows: QA9. hexStringToBytes32 fails to check that range idx, lastIdx is within 32 bytes range and thus the returned r will fit into bytes32. Mitigation: Introduce the check: function hexStringToBytes32 bytes memory str,...

CollectionBatchBuyOperator.sol: tokenIds array is not shortened properly which makes execute function revert when not all NFTs are purchased successfully

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The CollectionBatchBuyOperator contract allows parties to buy NFTs through proposals. The proposal specifies an nftContract and token IDs via the nftTokenIdsMerkleRoot parameter that can be bought. Allowed executors can then execute the actual purchase b...

MuteAmplifier.sol: rescueTokens function does not prevent fee tokens from being transferred

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The MuteAmplifier.rescueTokens function allows the owner to withdraw tokens that are not meant to be in this contract. The contract does protect tokens that ARE meant to be in the contract by not allowing them to be transferred: Link function...

TicketUtils: Number draws are not uniformly distributed

Lines of code Vulnerability details The number selection algorithm in TicketUtils.reconstructTicket "draws" winning numbers using modulo arithmetic and a random seed. However, selected numbers are not uniformly distributed. Due to modulo bias and successive draw logic, higher numbers will be draw...

Price manipulation attack

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The PriceFeed.sol was marked OOS but I believe this to be a valid issue. If the chainlink feed fails which is does from time to time, the Tellor price feed takes over no matter what the delta is compared to the chainlink price. This is an issue because t...

changeRewardSpeed function at the MultiRewardStaking contract is incorrectly implemented and can leave the staking of a token on a denial of service state (copy)

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The changeRewardSpeed function from the MultiRewardStaking.sol contract lacks documentation on how exactly it should work. By its name and some comments above it, I infer that the function must change the rate of tokens rewards per unit of time. For...

KUMAFeeCollector.changePayees() executes incorrectly when newPayees contains duplicate items

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact When calling KUMAFeeCollector.changePayees with duplicate payees in newPayees, the call is not reverted and the result state will be incorrect. Proof of Concept Contract KUMAFeeCollector does not support duplicate payees. The transaction will revert when...