Missing EIP-155 replay attack protection

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact publishProject/addMember/escrow in Community and inviteContractor/updateProjectHash/addTasks/setComplete/changeOrder in Project use ecrecover for signed messages to check access. However, all signed messages that is used to check access do not include an...

DOS on valid signatures

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact It was observed that signature matching can fail due to incorrect updation of operatorIndex. Each loop iteration should reset operatorIndex but this is not happening causing matches to be skipped as shown in POC Proof of Concept 1. Assume...

Attacker can empty vaults

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Both MIMOEmptyVault and MIMOLeverage contracts share same signature/definition, an attacker can gain control of EmptyVault contract, issue a flash loan, and empty the vaults. Proof of Concept See the test below. In below test, EmptyVault contract is...

Use SAFETRANSFERFROM() instead of TRANSFERFROM() for ERC721 TRANSFERS

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact In NameWrapper.sol the wrapETH2LD and unwrapETH2LD functions call transferFrom on a ERC721 token. This does not ensure that the token is not sent to an address that is not able to properly support it which could result in the loss of the token. This is...

Contracts calls to main ENS services will fail. Plus, ETHRegistrarController#withdraw() with future upgrades will revert

Lines of code Vulnerability details This is a classic Code4rena issue. The transfer call has a hard coded gas budget whenever this affect another part of the EVM will be very harmful for those usage which will make the system and its users at risk. There is two parts of this issue; when the calle...

Collateral limit can be bypassed in auction

Lines of code Vulnerability details Collateral limit could be bypassed, allowing more collateral to be auctioned concurrently than intended by governance. // There is a limit on how much collateral can be concurrently put at auction, but it is a soft limit. // If the limit has been surpassed, no...

Migration Module: After successful migration, ERC20 assets can be thrown away by anyone

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact HIGH - Assets can be lost directly After proposal and proposed buyout is successful, anyone can transfer ERC20 asset in the vault to the zero address and the asset will be lost. Proof of Concept proof of concept: testAnyoneCanThrowERC20poc The proof of...

Mismatch in withdraw() between Yearn and other protocols can prevent Users from redeeming zcTokens and permanently lock funds

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact As defined in the docs for Euler, ERC4626, Compound and Aave, when withdrawing and depositing funds the amount specified corresponds excactly to how many of the underlying assets are deposited or withdrawn. However, as specified by Yearn, the yearn...

Fake orders can be created for non existant tokens

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact NFT's can be stolen by an attacker Proof of Concept The putty contract is using the solmate safeTransfer instead of OpenZeppelin's so contract existence isn't being checked for transferred tokens. In the putty case, contract existance is checked for the...

instantUnstake function can be frontrunned with fee increase

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact instantUnstake allows user to unstake their stakingToken for a fee paid to the liquidity providers. This fee could be changed up to 100% any moment by admin. Malicious admin could frontrun users instantUnstake transaction and set fee to any value using...

Centralization Risk On The Withdraw Operation

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact During the code review, It has been observed that admin can withdraw all tokens from the system. Proof of Concept 1. Navigate to the following contract : Tools Used Code Review Recommended Mitigation Steps We advise the client to carefully manage the adm...

Potential denial of service issues

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Detailed description of the impact of this finding. I noticed that the withdrawUnsettledBids and redeem functions return the Ether amount by calling safeTransferETH, but if the to address passed in is a malicious contract address and the receive function...

zeroswap/UniswapV2Pair.sol Token reserves per lp token can be manipulated due to lack of MINIMUM_LIQUIDITY when minting the first liquidity with migrator

Lines of code Vulnerability details if totalSupply == 0 address migrator = IUniswapV2Factoryfactory.migrator; if msg.sender == migrator liquidity = IMigratormigrator.desiredLiquidity; requireliquidity 0 && liquidity != uint256-1, "Bad desired liquidity"; else requiremigrator == address0, "Must no...

rescueEth does not transfer ether in contract

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The InfinityStakerrescueETH and InfinityExchangerescueETH payable functions sends msg.value to the destination and not the ether in the contract, so the fees and accidentally transferred ether is not sent to the destination address Proof of Concept...

ETH rescue does not work

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Both contracts InfinityExchange and InfinityStaker have a function rescueETH to allow an admin to rescue any ETH accidentally sent to the contracts. However, this ETH rescue functionality does not work. The code expects ETH to be sent to this function an...

getCurrentPrice will be return a higher value than expected due to insufficient check in isTimeValid

Lines of code Vulnerability details The Boolean value will always return true if start price is zero. The condition will be sufficiently fulfilled since a time will be set in the future but no time is set in the past or at current time: sumCurrentPrices uses the returned value of getCurrentPrice...

Owner can sweep any token

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Admin can sweep any token even if the token is in use by the contract. Ideally only non blacklisted tokens should be allowed by unlockTokens function function unlockTokensIERC20 token external override onlyOwner uint256 amount = token.balanceOfaddressthi...

Upgraded Q -> H from 25 [1655007954017]

Judge has assessed an item in Issue 25 as High risk. The relevant finding follows: Fees should have a boundary of 100% 10000: Otherwise the contract will try to transfer more than possible which will result in reverts: It might also be helpful the have an fixed upper boundary that doesn't allow t...

RewardHandler.burnFees() could fail depending on number of pools with underlying = address(0)

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact If more than one pool has underlying = address0 then RewardHandler.burnFees will fail or use ETH balance from FeeBurner.sol. Proof of Concept RewardHandler.solL40-L50 uint256 ethBalance = addressthis.balance; address memory tokens = new address; for...

Anyone can add Gauge reward tokens and cause DoS

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The Gauge.notifyRewardAmount function does not have any access restriction. Anyone an attacker can frontrun and call this function to add arbitrary even malicious gauge reward tokens up to MAXREWARDTOKENS = 16. An attacker is able to frontrun and add 16...

Exchange Rate Race Condition

Lines of code Vulnerability details GAX-01M: Exchange Rate Race Condition | File | Lines | Type ---|---|--- gALCX.sol | L69-L81 | Improper State Assumption Description The gALCX contains a race condition whereby whenever the contract has no stakes such as when the contract is first deployed the...

hard-coded slippage may freeze user funds during market turbulence (resubmit to downgrade severity)

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact GeneralVault.solL125 GeneralVault set a hardcoded slippage control of 99%. However, the underlying yield tokens price may go down. If Luna/UST things happen again, users' funds may get locked. LidoVault.solL130-L137 Moreover, the withdrawal of the...

Re-entance steal token

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact An attacker can steal tokens from the protocol after it sent ETH to him. Proof of Concept 1.Alice create vault of some ERC20/NFT. and buy the option 2.Alice pay for itself, so ethBalanceAlice is greater than 1 3. Alice call harvest, and get eth. Alice...

Protocol unusable for some ERC20 tokens (bad tokens)

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Protocol unusable for some ERC20 tokens bad tokens PoC Some tokens don't correctly implement the EIP20 standard and their transfer/transferFrom return void The so called bad tokens. More info This makes the transaction revert when calling. Recommended Us...

Missing ERC20 return value check in MerkleVesting#withdraw

Lines of code Vulnerability details MerkleVestingwithdraw does not check the return value of the token withdrawal on line 173. If an ERC20 token returns false to indicate a failed transfer but does not revert, this transfer will silently fail but the withdrawal amount will still be deducted from...

Deprecated oracle can return 0 as a price

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact According to Chainlink's documentation, the latestAnswer function is deprecated. Proof of Concept This function does not error if no answer has been reached but returns 0. Besides, the latestAnswer is reported with 18 decimals for crypto quotes but 8...

Cast to uint192 is unsafe

Judge @GalloDaSballo has assessed the 3rd item in QA Report 197 as Medium risk. The relevant finding follows: … Cast to uint192 is unsafe, user trying to deposit more than 2^192 would recevie less deposits balance. depositspidmsg.sender.amount += uint192amount; --- The text was updated...

First xERC4626 deposit exploit can break share calculation

Lines of code Vulnerability details Solmate convertToShares function follow the formula: assetDepositAmount totalShareSupply / assetBalanceBeforeDeposit. The share price always return 1:1 with asset token. If everything work normally, share price will slowly increase with time to 1:2 or 1:10 as...

User can steal all rewards due to checkpoint after transfer

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact I believe this to be a high severity vulnerability that is potentially included in the currently deployed StakerVault.sol contract also. The team will be contacted immediately following the submission of this report. In StakerVault.sol, the user...

Arbitrary contract call within UniV3LpVault._swap with controllable swapPath

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact UniV3LpVault.swap utilizes swapRouter.exactInput to perform swaps between two tokens. During swaps, transfer function of each token along the path will be called to propagate the assets. Since anyone can create a uniswap pair of arbitrary assets, it is...

Existing user’s locked JPEG could be overwritten by new user, causing permanent loss of JPEG funds

Lines of code Vulnerability details Details & Impact A user’s JPEG lock schedule can be overwritten by another user’s if he the other user submits and finalizes a proposal to change the same NFT index’s value. The existing user will be unable to withdraw his locked JPEGs, resulting in permanent...

Delegations incorrectly tracked when multiple delegate() calls occur in the same block

Lines of code Vulnerability details The README.md states: If the user has a Lock, and delegates to someone, then the bonus voting power is not counted. Impact Accounts are still able to claim bonus voting power even if they delegate to someone else, and any operations that rely on the public...

Use of deprecated Chainlink function latestAnswer

Lines of code Vulnerability details function getCurrentPriceaddress asset external view overrideProviderOracleManager, IProviderOracleManager returns uint256 address assetOracle = getAssetOracleasset; IEACAggregatorProxy aggregator = IEACAggregatorProxyassetOracle; int256 answer =...

[WP-H0] When transferring tokens not in whitelist on Ethereum to Terra with CrossAnchorBridge.depositStable(), the funds may get frozen

Lines of code Vulnerability details In the current implementation of CrossAnchorBridge, all require that "Check that token is a whitelisted token" is commented out. As a result, users may send transcations with the non-whitelisted tokens and as they can not be processd properly on the Terra side,...

Missing Signature Verification Leads To Critical Parameter Changes

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact During the code review, It has been observed that, signature verification is commented out in the protocol. Without off-chain signature verification, an attacker is able to edit parameters in the protocol Proof of Concept 1. Navigate to the following...

Assets sent from MarginAccount to InsuranceFund will be locked forever

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Assets sent from MarginAccount to InsuranceFund will be locked forever Proof of Concept The insurance fund doesn't have a way to transfer non-vusd out of the contract. Assets transferred to the InsuranceFund will be locked forever. Mitigation Have a way...

Function getUnderlyingPrice in Oracle.sol does not check the price returned from chainlink aggregators

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The getUnderlyingPrice function in the contract Oracle.sol fetches the answer directly from a Chainlink aggregator using the latestRoundData function. There is no check if the return value is 0 or indicates stale data. This could lead to incorrect or sta...

The initialize() function can be called first by an attacker

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact In Delegation.sol the initialize function sets the owner of the contract and can only be called once. The problem is that an attacker can monitor the blockchain byte code and call the initialize function first automatically before the protocol has a chan...

Rewards can be claimed if merkle proof is known

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The README describes the following when a voting ends: Outside of the Hidden Hand contract scope, after the Tokemak CoRE round ends, proposal data is compiled and these two things happen: - The following is derived from the data: its hash KECCAK-256 and...

Manipulations of setFee

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact If we consider that the fee variable is meaningfully applied, there will still be several problems with this: 1. Admin can setFee up to 100%. This is bad for users, fees should have a reasonable upper limit, e.g. 30% to prevent potential griefing. 2...

Owner can lock tokens in MasterChef

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Owner can remove a depositor. Since only depositors can deposit and withdraw, the owner may add a contract to the whitelist, let users deposit in the contarct and remove the depositor from the whitelist. Depositor's reward cannot be withdrawn then. And...

ConvexStakingWrapper deposits and withdraws will frequently be disabled if a token that doesn't allow zero value transfers will be added as a reward one

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact If deposits and withdraws are done frequently enough, the reward update operation they invoke will deal mostly with the case when there is nothing to add yet, i.e. reward.remaining match the reward token balance. If reward token doesn't allow for zero...

Reenterancy in _sendSherRewardsToOwner()

Handle kirk-baird Vulnerability details Impact This is a reentrancy vulnerability that would allow the attacker to drain the entire SHER balance of the contract. Note: this attack requires gaining control of execution sher.transfer which will depend on the implementation of the SHER token. Contro...

Initial pool deposit can be stolen

Handle cmichel Vulnerability details Note that the PoolTemplate.initialize function, called when creating a market with Factory.createMarket, calls a vault function to transfer an initial deposit amount conditions1 from the initial depositor references4: // PoolTemplate function initialize string...

Covering impermanent loss allows profiting from asymmetric liquidity provision at the expense of reserves

Handle hyh Vulnerability details Impact Pool funds will be siphoned out over time as swaps and asymmetric LP provision are generally balancing each other economically. While with introduction of IL reimbursement a malicious user can make an asymmetric LP, then profit immediately from out of balan...

Basket.sol#publishNewIndex() Lack of input validation may cause fund loss to anyone who bonds an auction

Handle WatchPug Vulnerability details According to the newRatio formula in settleAuction, the maximum value of newRatio is factory.auctionMultiplier basket.ibRatio. However, since there is no validation for the value of minIbRatio when setting it, if the publisher publishes a newIndex with...

Reward token not correctly recovered

Handle cmichel Vulnerability details The Streaming contract allows recovering the reward token by calling recoverTokensrewardToken, recipient. However, the excess amount is computed incorrectly as ERC20token.balanceOfaddressthis - rewardTokenAmount + rewardTokenFeeAmount: function...

AMM pool can be drained using a flashloan and calling stabilize

Handle stonesandtrees Vulnerability details Impact All of the rewardToken in a given AMM pool can be removed from the AMM pool and distributed as LP rewards. Proof of Concept In the stabilize method in the StabilizerNode the initial check to see if the Malt price needs to be stabilized it uses a...

AbstractRewardMine.sol#setRewardToken is dangerous

Handle 0x0x0x Vulnerability details Impact In case the reward token is changed, totalDeclaredReward will be changed and likely equal to 0. Since userStakePadding and globalStakePadding are accumulated, changing the reward token will not reset those values. Thus, it will create problems...

Missing slippage/min-return check in UniswapHandler

Handle cmichel Vulnerability details The contracts are missing slippage checks which can lead to being vulnerable to sandwich attacks. A common attack in DeFi is the sandwich attack. Upon observing a trade of asset X for asset Y, an attacker frontruns the victim trade by also buying asset Y, lets...