Forced relock in VotiumStrategy withdrawal causes denial of service if Convex locking contract is shutdown

Lines of code Vulnerability details Summary The VotiumStrategy withdrawal process involves relocking CVX tokens, which can potentially lead to a denial of service and loss of user funds if the underlying vlCVX contract is shutdown. Impact When withdrawals are executed in VotiumStrategy, the...

M-04 MitigationConfirmed

Lines of code Vulnerability details In the previous implementation RewardableERC20claimAndSyncRewards rewardsPerShare += delta one / totalSupply; Some rewards might be locked inside the contract due to the rounding loss. Mitigation PR 896 Recalculated balanceAfterClaimingRewards to remove the...

Users can deposit() even when Chainlink's price feed for CVX is stale

Lines of code Vulnerability details Bug Description In VotiumStrategy.sol, the price of vAfEth is determined by the price function: VotiumStrategy.solL31-L33 function price external view override returns uint256 return cvxPerVotium ethPerCvxfalse / 1e18; As seen from above, it calls ethPerCVX wit...

AfEth collaterals cannot be balanced after ratio is changed

Lines of code Vulnerability details Summary The AfEth ratio between the collaterals can be modified but there is no direct way to balance the assets to follow the new ratio. Impact The AfEth contract contains a configurable parameter ratio that indicates the intended balance between the two...

The current vlCVX balance is not freezed, when withdrawal has been requested

Lines of code Vulnerability details Vulnerability Details After some deposits/withdrawals being made by users, the following edge case might occur: Let's say, n = totalLockedBalancePlusUnlockable, before iterating over the lockedBalances. t1 = lockedBalance0.unlockTime t2 =...

VotiumStrategyCore.applyRewards() leaves unlimited allowance on tokens.

Lines of code Vulnerability details Description VotiumStrategyCore.applyRewards gives unlimited allowance on its claimed rewards tokens. It is not thereafter reset and there is not even any way to reset the allowance. It is dangerous to trust the spenders indefinitely in case they are compromised...

Unsafe use of balanceOf(address(this))

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact AfEth.deposit can be bricked. Proof of Concept AfEth makes use of its own balance of afEth as a temporary store of afEth for withdrawal requests. On requestWithdraw afEth is transferred to the AfEth contract and these are then burned on withdraw. The...

Zero amount withdrawals of SafEth or Votium will brick the withdraw process

Lines of code Vulnerability details Summary Withdrawals of amount zero from both SafEth and VotiumStrategy have issues downstream that will cause the transaction to revert, potentially bricking withdrawals from being executed. Impact Withdrawals in AfEth undergo a process to account for any...

Sole depositor in the VotiumStrategy contract can inflate cvxPerVotium() to steal subsequent deposits

Lines of code Vulnerability details Bug Description In VotiumStrategyCore.sol, the cvxInSystem function returns the total amount of CVX in the protocol: VotiumStrategyCore.solL133-L138 function cvxInSystem public view returns uint256 uint256 total, , , = ILockedCvxVLCVXADDRESS.lockedBalances...

Missing slippage control while depositing rewards in SafEth and VotiumStrategy

Lines of code Vulnerability details Summary Deposits to SafEth and VotiumStrategy coming from rewards lack slippage control, making them susceptible to sandwich attacks by MEV bots, which can result in a loss of funds for the protocol. Impact Rewards coming from the VotiumStrategy contract are...

Intrinsic arbitrage from price discrepancy

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The up to 2 % price discrepancy from Chainlink creates an intrinsic arbitrage. Especially, it makes withdrawals worth more than deposits in the sense that one can immediately withdraw more than just deposited. Proof of Concept When depositing ETH into...

No slippage protection on rewards deposits

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Rewards deposit is not slippage protected and susceptible to MEV-attacks. Proof of Concept VotiumCoreStrategy.buyCvx is not slippage protected, as even acknowledged by the comment in ICrvEthPoolCVXETHCRVPOOLADDRESS.exchangeunderlying value: ethAmountIn 0...

Reward sandwiching in VotiumStrategy

Lines of code Vulnerability details Summary The reward system in VotiumStrategy can be potentially gamed by users to enter just before rewards are deposited and request an exit after that. Depending on the withdrawal queue, users may exit as early as the next epoch and avoid waiting the normal 16...

VotiumStrategy.price() does not validate Chainlink response

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact AfEth.deposit may mint an incorrect amount of afEth. VotiumStrategy.price may return an incorrect price of vAfEth. AfEth.price may return an incorrect price of afEth. Proof of Concept VotiumStrategy.price function price external view override returns...

Missing deadline check for AfEth actions

Lines of code Vulnerability details Summary AfEth main actions execute on-chain swaps and lack an expiration deadline, which enables pending transactions to be maliciously executed at a later point. Impact Both AfEth deposits and withdrawals include on-chain swaps in AMM protocols as part of thei...

sellCVX(0) reverts

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact A withdrawal cannot be finalised if requested at a time when AfEth had only safEth, and that owed share of safEth is permanently lost. Proof of Concept It is possible that AfEth holds at most dust amounts of vAfEth if ratio = 100 %. The amounts of vAfEth...

price() in AfEth.sol doesn't take afEth held for pending withdrawals into account

Lines of code Vulnerability details Bug Description In AfEth.sol, the price function returns the current price of afEth: AfEth.solL133-L141 function price public view returns uint256 if totalSupply == 0 return 1e18; AbstractStrategy vEthStrategy = AbstractStrategyvEthAddress; uint256...

AfEth deposits could use price data from an invalid Chainlink response

Lines of code Vulnerability details Summary The current price implementation for the VotiumStrategy token uses a potentially invalid Chainlink response. This price is then used to calculate the price of AfEth and, subsequently, the amount of tokens to mint while depositing. Impact The price of...

Lack of access control and value validation in the reward flow exposes functions to public access

Lines of code Vulnerability details Summary Some functions that are part of the Votium reward flow are left unprotected and can be accessed by anyone to spend resources held by the contract. Impact Rewards coming from the Votium protocol are claimed and compounded back in AfEth. This flow consist...

Withdrawals will be permanently DOSed if VLCVX's owner decides to shutdown the contract

Lines of code Vulnerability details Bug Description In VotiumStrategy.sol, the relock function is used to withdraw all unlockable CVX and then lock an appropriate amount of CVX again. It does so by calling lock of the VLCVX contract: VotiumStrategy.solL145-L148 if cvxAmountToRelock 0...

AfEth price calculation doesn't factor locked tokens held in contract balance

Lines of code Vulnerability details Summary When withdrawals are enqueued in AfEth, the implementation will remove the tokens from the caller and lock these in the contract until the withdrawal is made effective. These tokens still count in the supply, and must not be considered during price...

Swap functionality to sell rewards is too permissive and could cause accidental or intentional loss of value

Lines of code Vulnerability details Summary While the intention is to use the 0x protocol to sell rewards, the implementation doesn't provide any basic guarantee this will correctly happen and grants the rewarder arbitrary control over the tokens held by the strategy. Impact Rewards earned in the...

cvxPerVotium() calculation will return zero if all CVX tokens are pending withdrawal as obligations

Lines of code Vulnerability details Summary The implementation of cvxPerVotium contains an edge case that causes it to return an invalid zero value price. Impact The cvxPerVotium function present in the VotingStrategy contract is used to measure the number of held CVX tokens per vAfEth. 144:...

Lack of slippage protection for depositRewards() in AfEth.sol makes it susceptible to sandwich attacks

Lines of code Vulnerability details Bug Description In VotiumStrategyCore.sol, the buyCvx function calls exchangeunderlying of Curve's ETH / CVX pool to buy CVX: VotiumStrategyCore.solL233-L240 ICrvEthPoolCVXETHCRVPOOLADDRESS.exchangeunderlying value: ethAmountIn 0, 1, ethAmountIn, 0 // this is...

Missing slippage control when directly interacting with the VotiumStrategy contract

Lines of code Vulnerability details Summary Direct deposits and withdrawals within VotiumStrategy lack any slippage controls, which opens up the possibility of sandwich attacks and Miner Extractable Value MEV exploits. Impact Interactions in the AfEth protocol often require the exchange of ETH fo...

Incorrect AfEth.price() calculation

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact AfEth.price may be calculated as too low. Proof of Concept AfEth.requestWithdraw does not burn the afEth but only transfers it to itself. Hence the withdrawRatio is calculated using only the free supply of afEth: AfEth.solL180-L185 // ratio of afEth bein...

VotiumStrategy.requestWithdraw() does not account for immediately possible withdrawals

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact A user might be given an unnecessarily late withdrawal epoch. VotiumStrategy.requestWithdraw might revert altogether. Proof of Concept VotiumStrategy.requestWithdraw finds the epoch at which withdrawal is possible by the following logic: , uint256...

Withdrawal requests do not check if the amount of unlockable CVX is sufficient for withdrawals

Lines of code Vulnerability details Bug Description In AfEth.sol, whenever a user calls requestWithdraw to queue a withdrawal, the time that they can withdraw is determined by withdrawTime: AfEth.solL175-L176 function requestWithdrawuint256 amount external virtual uint256 withdrawTimeBefore =...

Functions in the VotiumStrategy contract are susceptible to sandwich attacks

Lines of code Vulnerability details Bug Description In VotiumStrategyCore.sol, the buyCvx and sellCvx functions call exchangeunderlying of Curve's ETH / CVX pool to buy and sell CVX respectively: VotiumStrategyCore.solL233-L240 ICrvEthPoolCVXETHCRVPOOLADDRESS.exchangeunderlying value: ethAmountIn...

Potential rewards stealing by manipulating CVX/ETH pool

Lines of code Vulnerability details Vulnerability Details Upon claiming Votium rewards, applyRewards is intended to be invoked in order to exchange the tokens for eth and put the eth received back into the strategies. Based on the current ratio it either stakes the amount into safETH or obtains...

It might not be possible to applyRewards(), if an amount received is less than 0.05 eth

Lines of code Vulnerability details Vulnerability Details Upon claiming Votium rewards, applyRewards is intended to be invoked bi-weekly in order to exchange the tokens for eth and put the eth received back into the strategies. Based on the current ratio it either stakes the amount into safETH or...

Attacker can mint afEth with cheaper price

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Attacker can mint afEth with cheaper price and then withdraw. Proof of Concept When user would like to buy some amount of afEth tokens, then price is calculated. This price will be used to calculate amount of tokens to mint. function price public view...

Last stakers may not receive funds back

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Last stakers may not receive funds back. Proof of Concept When user wants to withdraw, then he needs to initiate requestWithdraw. As some part of funds are locked as cvx token inside vlcvx that means that they should be withdrawn. When you lock cvx then...

VotiumStrategyCore.applyRewards can be sandwhiched to make profit

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact VotiumStrategyCore.applyRewards can be sandwhiched to make profit. Proof of Concept VotiumStrategyCore.applyRewards function will swap all rewards of contract into eth and then stake them into safEth or vEth contract. As result price of afEth token will...

VotiumStrategyCore.applyRewards can be sandwhiched

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact VotiumStrategyCore.applyRewards can be sandwhiched, so users rewards will be lost. Proof of Concept VotiumStrategyCore.applyRewards will be used in order to swap all rewards to eth and then distribute eth to the safEth or vEth. The problem here is that...

VotiumStrategy.withdrawTime doesn't expect that balance can be already unlocked

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact VotiumStrategy.withdrawTime doesn't expect that balance can be already unlocked. As result user can wait more time to witdraw. Proof of Concept When user wants to withdraw, then he needs to initiate requestWithdraw. As some part of funds are locked as cv...

Stale cvx price can be used while depositing

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Stale cvx price can be used while depositing Proof of Concept When user deposits, then price of afEth token is calculated. It's needed to know how many tokens user will receieve. This price consists of safEth price and vEth price. This is how price is...

AfEth withdrawing will not work when ratio will be 0

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact AfEth withdrawing will not work when ratio will be 0. It will be not possible to withdraw. Proof of Concept Any ratio for the 2 tokens of afEth can be set by owner. AfEth.withdraw function will not work in case if ratio will be 0, which means that safEth...

Leaky faucet

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Leaking is bad. Proof of Concept Turn off faucet, it leaks! Tools Used Hands Recommended Mitigation Steps Teflon tape. Assessed type Other --- The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: All reactions...

Upgraded Q -> 2 from #506 [1695291399781]

Judge has assessed an item in Issue 506 as 2 risk. The relevant finding follows: L‑01 The admin wont be able to burn rUSDY if the address is blacklisted/sanctioned and not on the allowlist The burn function in rUSDY.sol allows the admin to seize rUSDY if the user is not legally allowed to own it...

Upgraded Q -> 2 from #86 [1695205999296]

Judge has assessed an item in Issue 86 as 2 risk. The relevant finding follows: QA-02. BondingManager.withdrawFees doesn’t create checkpoint --- The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: All reactions...

Potential Incorrect Domain Separator Generation in _calculateDomainSeparator Function

Lines of code Vulnerability details The calculateDomainSeparator function generates the EIP-712 domain separator using the contract's name and version. However, there is no explicit guarantee that the name has been set before calling this function, leading to an unreliable domain separator. Impac...

Allowing price updates once in an epoch is extremely risky and open windows to a lot of issues

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Protocol currently knows about how this could be an effect, since the comments to both previewDeposit and convertToShares suggest that any difference attached to this should be considered slippage, but measures are not taken to ensure that this slippage ...

Malicious RestrictionManger can be used to verify Tranche Members

Lines of code Vulnerability details The ability to file a new Restriction Manger after deployment can actually be utilized by a rouge ward and deploy a malicious version of the RestrictionManger that implements almost the same thing as the originals, but just tweaked to return the SUCCESSMESSAGE...

Some Outgoing functions are not supported on the gateway

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The gateway serves both outgoing and incoming calls, All incoming calls should have corresponding outgoing calls and vice versa However, some incoming calls like addPool , allowPoolCurrency , addTranche have no corresponding calls via the gateway contrac...

users can mint TT tokens without locking/depositing any currency tokens

Lines of code https://github.com/code-423n4/2023-09-centrifuge/blob/512e7a71ebd9ae76384f837204216f26380c9f91/src/InvestmentManager.solL427-L441...

transferIn() is susceptible to a front-running attack

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Another auth caller can exploit the vulnerability by executing front-running transactions using the source address that has just given allowance approval to the contract. This allows the attacker to acquire and increase the destination amount of the...

Owners having valid permits might not be able to deposit or redeem assets/shares due to incorrect order of address validation in _isValidSignature

Lines of code Vulnerability details Proof of Concept requestDepositWithPermit requests asset deposit for a receiver to be included in the next epoch execution with a permit option. requestRedeemWithPermit request share redemption for a receiver to be included in the next epoch execution with a...

Unchecked Minting

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact There is a possibility, an attacker can force minting of tokens to self or any other diluting the token value and stealing funds in the process Proof of Concept Here is a step-by-step process The attacker calls the transferFrom function with msg.data...

Unchecked Input

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Attackers can get the auth badge due to unchecked input vulnerability at the LiquidityPool The wardmsg.sender badge gives the attacker the highest role in the entire Centrifuge ecosystem, allowing the attacker to steal funds and cause DOS. Proof of Conce...