Irrevocable token holders can instantly mint a revocable token after burning and bypass the minimum XVS stake for revocable tokens

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact When an irrevocable token is burned by the admin, the holder should go through the 90 day staking period again before accruing rewards. However, the holder can exploit the protocol to immediately begin accruing rewards after burning. Furthermore, the...

Missing deadline check for AfEth actions

Lines of code Vulnerability details Summary AfEth main actions execute on-chain swaps and lack an expiration deadline, which enables pending transactions to be maliciously executed at a later point. Impact Both AfEth deposits and withdrawals include on-chain swaps in AMM protocols as part of thei...

getActiveTickIndex implementation error

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The implementation of getActiveTickIndex is wrong, and the searched ticks do not meet expectations, causing funds to be incorrectly allocated to edge ticks, and there is basically no staking income. Proof of Concept // if base token is token0, ticks abov...

Flashloan/Sandwich Attacks on UpdateFunding()

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The attacker can launch a sandwich/flashloan attack on the updateFunding function to gain most of the reward. Proof of Concept 1. The attacker observed that some reward is going to be distributed via updateFunding function. 2. The attacker borrowed...

Permanent funds lock in StargateRewardableWrapper

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The staked funds might be locked because the deposit/withdraw/transfer logic reverts. Proof of Concept In StargateRewardableWrapper, claimAssetRewards claims the accumulated rewards from the staking contract and it's called during every...

rate is wrong

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact attacker can manipulate pool price to make strategy have eth lower as it should have 1 seth 1 eth then mint new steth 1 steth = 1 eth so attacker can gain share more than normal Proof of Concept 1. attacker manipulate pool price 1 seth 1 eth 2. attacker...

Inaccurate implementation of ECDSA creates signature malleability

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The ecrecover function is an inherent cryptographic function within Solidity which enables the retrieval of the signer's address messages which have been signed with their private key. Of course, this is very important when it comes to verifying the...

M-04 Unmitigated

Lines of code Vulnerability details While the fix improves the APR estimation for the case that is described in the finding, it significantly worsens it for other scenarios which may happen in practice when we assume underlying staking protocols with relatively constant APRs. For instance, consid...

FlywheelAcummulatedRewards/FlywheelBribeRewards gains are instantaneous and can be frontrun

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact FlywheelAcummulatedRewards/FlywheelBribeRewards gains are instantaneous and can be frontrun. The user only needs to frontrun the delegate before each incentive is distributed to get the incentive, and there is no way to prevent the user from undelegating...

flashloan stealing staking reward

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The report reveals a vulnerability where a flashloan can be used to steal staking rewards. The provided proof of concept demonstrates the issue, where a user can take advantage of the earned rewards calculation using the spot balance. By flashloaning a...

First user can drain funds from staking contract

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact If the first user locks an extremely small amount of tokens 1 wei, he can manipulate the reward that is supposed to receive. After locking a small amount, he can unlock it before the second user interacts with the contract. See PoC for more details. Note...

Loss of staking yield for stakers when another user stakes in pause/frozen state

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Loss of staking yield for stakers when another user stakes in pause/frozen state. Proof of Concept Issue 148 from previous audit is present again. As i can see it was mitigated. But maybe after that new code changes were made, so this issue is present...

User who stakes into StRSRVotes doesn't have any voting power

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact User who stakes into StRSRVotes doesn't have any voting power. This is not intuitive clear and user who thinks that he can vote, actually will not be able until he will delegate votes to himself. Proof of Concept StRSRVotes contract extends StRSR which h...

NodeOperator will steal other NodeOperators' validators through frontrunning

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact People that want to earn staking rewards, but do not have the resources to run validators, will see Stader as an avenue where they can easily steal and use others validators and they will actually earn Operator rewards from Stader. This could lead to two...

A new era might be triggered despite a significant value being held in the previous era

Lines of code Vulnerability details When RSR seizure occurs the staking and drafting rate is adjusted accordingly, if any of those rates is above some threshold then a new era begins draft or staking era accordingly, wiping out all of the holdings of the current era. The assumption is that if the...

Tenet and LayerZero Forge Cross-Chain LSD Adoption

By Owais Sultan Tenet and LayerZero Partner to Pioneer Cross-Chain Liquidity for Liquid Staking Derivatives. This is a post from HackRead.com Read the original post: Tenet and LayerZero Forge Cross-Chain LSD Adoption...

wxETH is vulnerable to the inflation attack

Lines of code Vulnerability details wxETH is vulnerable to the inflation attack The wxETH contract is vulnerable to the attack known as "inflation attack" in which a bad actor can front-run initial stake transactions and steal all deposit funds. Impact The staking functionality of wxETH is...

stake() function: The provided stake function lacks checks to prevent a lender from staking multiple NFTs in the same Ajna pool. The function allows any owned position NFT to be staked without considering whether the lender has already staked in the pool. This potentially opens up the system to an abuse where a lender stakes multiple NFTs for the same liquidity position.

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The current stake function lacks checks to prevent a lender from staking multiple NFTs in the same Ajna pool. This could lead to an abuse of the system where a lender stakes multiple NFTs for the same liquidity position, potentially earning more rewards...

unstake() function: The unstake function permits the unstaking of multiple position NFTs from the same liquidity pool (LP) by the same lender. This opens the possibility for a lender to claim more Ajna token rewards than they are entitled to by staking and unstaking multiple NFTs associated with the same LP.

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The absence of a mechanism to prevent a lender from unstaking multiple NFTs for the same liquidity pool LP could potentially lead to the exploitation of the Ajna token reward system. A lender can mint, stake, and unstake multiple NFTs for the same LP fro...

Mitigation of M-05: Issue not mitigated, mitigation errors

MITIGATION IS NOT CONFIRMED MITIGATION IS NOT CONFIRMED Mitigation of M-05: Issue not mitigated, mitigation errors Link to Issue: code-423n4/2023-03-asymmetry-findings812 Comments The issue describes missing checks associated with staking requirements for the WstEth and Reth derivative. The...