Reentry restrictions are not properly released

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact After LSP6KeyManagerCore.execute or LSP6KeyManagerCore.executeRelayCall is executed, non-isSetData methods that call these two methods without re-entry permission cannot be called normally Proof of Concept Tools Used manual review Recommended Mitigation...

RootBridgeAgent.redeemSettlement can be front-run using RootBridgeAgent.retrySettlement causing redeem DoS

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Since RootBridgeAgent.retrySettlement... can be called by anyone for any settlement, a malicious actor can front-run an user trying to redeem his failed settlement via RootBridgeAgent.redeemSettlement... by calling RootBridgeAgent.retrySettlement... with...

Vulnerable to MEV exploitation due to lack of slippage protection

Lines of code Vulnerability details Proof of Concept Function to decrease and increase liquidity are passing amount0Min and amount1Min as zero. This will result in MEV bots sandwiching transactions to extract value from it. In the worst case it will actually return zero or a very small value in...

BranchPort.toggleStrategyToken used on unregistered STRATEGY TOKEN will allow STRATEGIES to drain full token balance

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact BranchPort.toggleStrategyToken may be called on a token not registered as a strategy token effectively registering it without setting a getMinimumTokenReserveRatio. In such a case minimumReserves will always return a value smaller than the current balanc...

Slippage controls for calling bHermes contract's ERC4626DepositOnly.deposit and ERC4626DepositOnly.mint functions are missing

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact mentions that "if implementors intend to support EOA account access directly, they should consider adding an additional function call for deposit/mint/withdraw/redeem with the means to accommodate slippage loss or unexpected deposit/withdrawal limits,...

Tokens with multiple addresses can be stolen due to reliance on balanceOf()

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Some ERC20 tokens have multiple valid contract addresses that serve as entrypoints for manipulating the same underlying storage such as Synthetix tokens like SNX and sBTC and the TUSD stablecoin. The accrueUser function holds all rewards for all pools,...

_payFallbackGas is not being paid in case selector is 0x07 or 0x08

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact payFallbackGas gas is not being paid for selectors 0x07 and 0x08 which causes a loss for protocol's execution gas budget. In case Execution budget is not enough then anyFallback will fail. Proof of Concept In payFallbackGas gas should always be paid in...

Potential Loss of Funds Due to Zero Slippage Hardcoding in TalosBaseStrategy#deposit

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact In the deposit function within the TalosBaseStrategy contract, both slippage for two tokens amount0Min and amount1Min are hardcoded to zero. This can have severe implications as users may unintentionally accept a minimum of zero output tokens from a swap...

In VirtualAccount.sol.withdrawERC20(), Transaction revert if the Token does not support 0 value transfer

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact In VirtualAccount.sol.withdrawERC20, Transaction revert if the Token does not support 0 value transfer when transferring tokens to recipient address. File: src/ulysses-omnichain/VirtualAccount.sol 31 function withdrawERC20address token, uint256 amount...

Bad accounting on ERC4626MultiToken.sol leads to user funds stuck in the contract

Lines of code Vulnerability details Summary Bad accounting on ERC4626MultiToken.sol leads to user funds stuck in the contract on deposit and withdraw logic. Vulnerability Detail The UlyssesToken unified liquidity tokens are derived from ERC4626Multitoken. This is an standard tokenized vault with...

The code uses arithmetic operations without explicitly checking for possible overflows or underflows

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The impact of the Integer Overflow/Underflow vulnerability can be summarized as follows: Data Inaccuracy: The vulnerability can lead to incorrect calculations and inaccurate data, potentially compromising the integrity of voting processes and other...

Id not saved when adding a vault with addVault or partner with addPartner

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact In the PartnerManagerFactory contract when adding a new vault with the addVault or adding a new partner with addPartner function, both functions does not save the id of the added vault or partner, this will cause function like migratePartnerVault to reve...

Contracts are vulnerable to rebasing accounting-related issues

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Rebasing tokens are tokens that have each holder's balanceof increase over time. Aave aTokens are an example of such tokens. If rebasing tokens are used, rewards accrue to the contract holding the tokens, and cannot be withdrawn by the original depositor...

Unable to check state() if proposalId == 0

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact state function cannot be called to view proposal state if proposalId == 0. Proof of Concept There is no check to prevent queueing a proposalId with a value of 0 via the queue function. However, in the state function there is a check preventing using a...

Although ERC20Boost.decrementGaugesBoostIndexed function would require user to remove all of her or his boost from a deprecated gauge at once, such user can instead call ERC20Boost.decrementGaugeBoost function for multiple times to utilize such deprecated gauge and decrement its userGaugeBoost for multiple times

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact When the gauge input corresponds to a deprecated gauge, calling the following ERC20Boost.decrementGaugeBoost function can still execute gaugeState.userGaugeBoost -= boost.toUint128 if boost = gaugeState.userGaugeBoost is false. function...

addLiquidity() unable to work

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact missing the first transfer of the asset to router, addLiquidity unable to work Proof of Concept UlyssesRouter.addLiquidityuse for mint LP The code is as follows: function addLiquidityuint256 amount, uint256 minOutput, uint256 poolId external returns...

User may get less tokens than expected when collateral list order changes

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The order of ts.collateralList is not stable: Whenever LibSetters.revokeCollateral is used to revoke a collateral, it may change because of the swap that is performed. However, the function Redeemer.redeem relies on this order, as the user has to provide...

User can brick collateralization ratio calculation by donating a small amount

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The following code is used to calculate the collateralization ratio when stablecoinsIssued 0: collatRatio = uint64totalCollateralization.mulDivBASE9, stablecoinsIssued, Math.Rounding.Up; During normal operation, this should not overflow. However, when...

If a STRATEGY TOKEN is "Toggled off" STRATEGIES will still be able to withdraw but returning of tokens with replenishReserves will be disabled.

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact BranchPort.manage allows a registered Strategy to withdraw certain amounts of enabled strategy tokens. It validates access rights ie. if called by a strategy registered for the requested token. It however doesn't check if the token itself is currently...

BranchBridgeAgent invokes anyCall with PAY ON SOURCE but doesn't send value with it. All calls will fail.

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact IAnycallProxy.anyCall operates under one of two modes of taking fees, namely fees are taken either on source or on the destination chain. Fee mode is decided by the caller with an appropriate value of the fourth parameter, ie. uint256 flag . Values 0,4...

doRebalance in Talos is vulnerable to Flash loan Attacks resulting loss of funds

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Loss of funds due to MEV Sandwich attacks. Proof of Concept Rebalancing is done using doRebalance method in TalosStrategySimple. File: TalosStrategySimple.sol function doRebalance internal override returns uint256 amount0, uint256 amount1 int24...

FlywheelAcummulatedRewards/FlywheelBribeRewards gains are instantaneous and can be frontrun

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact FlywheelAcummulatedRewards/FlywheelBribeRewards gains are instantaneous and can be frontrun. The user only needs to frontrun the delegate before each incentive is distributed to get the incentive, and there is no way to prevent the user from undelegating...

Many create methods are suspicious of the reorg attack

Lines of code Vulnerability details Proof of Concept There are many instance of this, but to understand things better, taking the example of createTalosV3Strategy method. The createTalosV3Strategy function deploys a new TalosStrategyStaked contract using the create, where the address derivation...

Incorrect Use of Equality Operator in addPartner and addVault Functions

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The addPartner and addVault functions in the PartnerManagerFactory contract are intended to add new partner managers and vaults respectively. These functions also assign a unique ID to each new partner manager and vault by storing them in the partnerIds...

the mint function in erc4626 will mint incorrect amount

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact if you look at the ERC4626 contract the function mint minting the wrong amount at line 53 it should be minting the assets amount not the amount of the share and because the shares and assets are not 1:1 it will lead to unwanted results and different mint...

Not using slippage parameter in swap() while swapping causes loss of funds

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact While making a swap on UniswapV3 the caller should use the slippage parameter amountOutMinimum parameter to avoid losing funds. In swapToEqualAmounts does not use the slippage parameter amountOutMinimum. File: /src/talos/libraries/PoolActions.solL46-L52...

Liquidity providers may lose funds when initialising a strategy

Lines of code Vulnerability details Summary Liquidity providers may lose funds when initialising a strategy Vulnerability Detail Liquidity providers may lose a portion of provided liquidity in either of the pair tokens when creating a new position. The init function on TalosBaseStrategy.sol does...

Reentrancy Vulnerability: The contract inherits from the ReentrancyGuard contract, which smay be vulnerable to reentrancy attacks if not properly handled in the contract's logic.

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The impact of the reentrancy vulnerability in the incrementGaugeWeight function can be summarized as follows: Loss of Funds: Attackers can drain funds from the contract or manipulate balances. Unexpected State Changes: Manipulation of variables can lead ...

DENIAL OF SERVICE (DoS) WHEN DECREASING THE weight DUE TO UNDERFLOW IN THE UlyssesPool.setWeight FUNCTION

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The UlyssesPool.setWeight function is used to update the weight of a particular poolId in the current UlyssesPool. But when the weight of the respective poolId is decreased from the current value, the calculation underflows and thus DoS the reducing of...

_voteSucceeded and proposals give opposite result

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact In the LybraGovernance contract, the voteSucceeded function returns true if supportVotes1 supportVotes0. At the same time in the proposals function supportVotes0 is returned as forVotes and supportVotes1 is returned as againstVotes. This could suggest,...

A user could drain collateral from LybraStETHVault.sol even if they have redeemed all their eUSD for their deposited collateral

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Suppose a user deposits certain Ether and mints eUSD. The user collects mining rewards for sometime assuming that the their earnings are not claimable by others. After sometime, the user redeems all their eUSD for StETH. Now, even after redemption, the...

maxSupply in esLBR.sol is wrong

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Proof of Concept As mentioned in the docs in line 6 in esLBR.sol contract , the maximum supply will be 55 million . - The maximum amount that can be minted through the esLBRMinter contract is 55 million. But the maximum supply is hardcoded 100 million in...

distributeRewards can revert because of the too strict slippage check

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The report highlights that the distributeRewards function can revert due to a strict slippage check. The provided proof of concept demonstrates the issue, where the slippage is set to 98%, leading to potential transaction failures. Proof of Concept...

[M] Mining rewards are not distributed to users

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Expected mining rewards in distributeRewards are not distributed due to a revert in purchaseOtherEarnings. Proof of Concept A missing mintVault implementation in transferFrom will inevitably cause a revert in purchaseOtherEarnings. This means expected...

[H] Users can lose funds if they call depositEtherToMint

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Due to only an interface implementation of function submit in Lido contract, users will lose funds due to non-existent implementation. Proof of Concept The comments in the code suggest that when users deposit ETH, it should be directly deposited into the...

executeFlashloan() doesn't pass/authenticate the initiator address

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact In PeUSDMainnetStableVision.sol executeFlashloan. File: contracts/lybra/token/PeUSDMainnetStableVision.sol 129 function executeFlashloanFlashBorrower receiver, uint256 eusdAmount, bytes calldata data public payable 130 uint256 shareAmount =...

quorumReached does not account for forVotes

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact quorumReached does not account for forVotes. Proof of Concept The supportVodes mapping of the ProposalExtraData struct consists of three values: forVotes, againstVotes and abstainVotes respectively on keys 0, 1 and 2. The function: function...

Incorrect poolTotalEUSDCirculation Calculation

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact poolTotalEUSDCirculation calculated incorerctly so it can effect reward distribution Proof of Concept The following line of code deduces repaid amount from poolTotalEUSDCirculation while the fee that is part of repaid amount will be distribute as rewards...

The ethlbrStakePool, which is used in LOC 155 in EUSDMiningIncentives.sol, has no function balanceOf()

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The EUSDMiningIncentives.sol in LOC 155 uint256 userStaked = IEUSDethlbrStakePool.balanceOfuser; calls balanceOf function of ethlbrStakePool. By asking one of the sponsors, the address of this pool was given as 0x857CC243b8494e13BdbAde27C25ef61c2e500fda...

[H] Users can withdraw more tokens than they have staked

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Users can withdraw more tokens than they have staked from the contract. In stakerewardV2pool, there is no check to stop a user from withdrawing more tokens than they have staked. The tokens are simply subtracted from the user's balance and from the total...

Wrong proposalThreshold amount in LybraGovernance.sol

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The proposal can be created with only 100000 esLBR delegated instead of 10000000. Proof of Concept According to LybraV2Docs, a proposal can only be created if the sender has at least 10 million esLBR tokens delegated to his address to meet the proposal...

_voteSucceeded check is invalid

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact //@audit-issue wrong check vote succeeded is when 0 1 function voteSucceededuint256 proposalId internal view override returns bool return proposalDataproposalId.supportVotes1 proposalDataproposalId.supportVotes0; voteSucceeded is a function that checks i...

Calls to rigidRedemption can fail due to an underflow when collateralAsset price falls.

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact When the collateralAsset price falls drastically a wrong collateralAmount is calculated in the line below from the eusdAmount. The collateralAmount calculated can be greater than the amount deposited by the provider in the rigidRedemption. Which leads to...

[H] Eth remains stuck in contract due to reversion in convertToPeUSD

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact ETH sent with this call will not be refunded to the caller upon revert. Proof of Concept Due to a discrepancy in the convertToPeUSD function where the call to mintVault implemenation from transferFrom is non-existent, the subsequent call to...

flashloan stealing staking reward

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The report reveals a vulnerability where a flashloan can be used to steal staking rewards. The provided proof of concept demonstrates the issue, where a user can take advantage of the earned rewards calculation using the spot balance. By flashloaning a...

The _spendAllowance function in EUSD contract is labeled as virtual which can be overriden as malicious code

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The spendAllowance function is labeled as virtual which can be overriden by some malicious code Proof of Concept The attacker could modify the spendAllowance function to only call approve function of same contract which is internal and can pass max...

Owner will be address(0) because it is not initialized

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Owner will be address0 making the functions which use the onlyOwner modifier insolvable Proof of Concept There are contracts in the protocol which use the Ownable from OZ: esLBRBoost.sol, EUSDMiningIncentives.sol, ProtocolRewardsPool.sol,...

contract has the tendency to mint more tokens than it actually has

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact If the contract does not have enough esLBR tokens to mint and transfer as rewards, users will not be able to claim their rewards even if they have earned them. Proof of Concept There is no check to ensure that the contract's balance of esLBR tokens is...

An attacker can burn shares of other users by calling executeFlashloan()

Lines of code Vulnerability details The executeFlashloan in PeUSDMainnetStableVision.sol allows users to execute flash loans but the problem is that the receiver doesnt have to be the msg.sender so an attacker can do 2 things: 1. Execute other users flash loans 2. If a user is a smart contract th...

proposals view function returns wrong voting results

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Detailed description of the impact of this finding. Even though, the votes are calculated correctly, the proposals view function returns wrong voting results returning forVotes results as againstVotes amount. This would negatively impact the users...