Lack of token approval reverts the overall trade

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Since the user has not approved the params.collateralAmount, calling the safeTransferFrom function will result in a revert due to the lack of token approval. The Exchange contract not receive any collateralAmount. Proof of Concept...

Namespace fuse ignores font class attribute from tile data

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The fuse function present in the Namespace contract mints a new Namespace NFT based on the given character data that references Tray tiles owned by the caller. For each character, the implementation will use the characterToUnicodeBytes function from the...

Incorrect use of the && Operator will allow anyone to fuse a new Namespace NFT

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Any caller can easily mint NFT if they provide a valid list of characters with the appropriate trays, the problem with this code is in this check if trayOwner != msg.sender && tray.getApprovedtrayID != msg.sender && !tray.isApprovedForAlltrayOwner,...

A user can mint a PFP NFT multiple times using the same _nftId

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact A user might unintentionally "intentionally" try to take advantage of the mint function in ProfilePicture.sol Proof of Concept The pfp mapping stores the pfp data per NFT, L31-32 of Profilepicture.sol /// @notice Stores the pfp data per NFT mappinguint25...

ProfilePictureData is not stored, which will cause serious logic errors

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact All data minted by the contract will not be stored, paralyzing the entire contract Proof of Concept code snippet： function mintaddress nftContract, uint256 nftID external uint256 tokenId = ++numMinted; if ERC721nftContract.ownerOfnftID != msg.sender reve...

bootloader doesn't add tighter gas limit to the IAccount.validateTransaction call

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact As mentioned in the competition details: Important, while the bootloader is out of scope, we may reward an additional bounty for valid bugs found in it by our judgement! As mentioned in the dev document, , there are some limitations of the verification a...

Anyone can steal funds in the Contract Deployer

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact If ContractDeployer.sol ever holds funds, it could potentially be drained via the chained creation of new contracts. Proof of Concept When creating a contract the create/create2 functions will be called inside the contract deployer here: , which after...

Unchecked msg.value will lead to losing funs inside the contract

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact While paying for the transaction, function payForTransaction bytes32, // txHash bytes32, // suggestedSignedHash Transaction calldata transaction external payable ignoreNonBootloader ignoreInDelegateCall //@audit-issue no checks that actulayy there is...

Possible loss of funds when withdrawing from L2 to L1

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Context To initiate a withdrawal from L2 to L1, a user can call L2EthToken.withdraw method, then funds will be available to calim on L1 via finalizeEthWithdrawal method of MailboxFacet. function withdrawaddress l1Receiver external payable override The...

Unclaimed rewards will be stuck unrecoverable

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The vulnerability relies in: unchecked uint256 share = points PRECISION / pool.totalPoints totalReward; uint256 daoShare = share pool.daoTax / 100 DIVISOR; share /= PRECISION; daoShare /= PRECISION; return share - daoShare, daoShare; The problem is that ...

Unvalidated input in setManagerRight function

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The setManagerRight function takes managedRight and managerRight as inputs without validating them This could potentially lead to unexpected results if the input values are not what the function expects. Tools Used Recommended Mitigation Steps Provide...

Upgraded Q -> 2 from #345 [1678798679676]

Judge has assessed an item in Issue 345 as 2 risk. The relevant finding follows: Issue 2 - Undermining the fairness of the protocol in swapSource and possibilities for stealing a jackpot --- The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: All reactions...

Upgraded Q -> 2 from #345 [1678798666534]

Judge has assessed an item in Issue 345 as 2 risk. The relevant finding follows: Issue 1 - An attacker can leave the protocol in a "drawing" state for extended period of time --- The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: All reactions...

Rounding division error could occur in the receiveRandomNumber function

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact This rounding division error could result in the prize pool being drained over time if it occurs repeatedly, as the actual amount of prizes awarded would always be slightly less than the intended amount. Proof of Concept drawRewardSizedrawFinalized,...

SWC-101 Artihmetic Overflow test/LotteryInvariantChecks.t.sol testBuyClaimFinalize()

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Integer overflow on finalizeDraw function. Failing tests: Encountered 1 failing test in test/LotteryInvariantChecks.t.sol:LotteryInvariantChecksTest FAIL. Reason: Arithmetic over/underflow Counterexample:...

claimPerDraw() can accounts for referrals after the ticket registration deadline

Lines of code Vulnerability details When accounting for referrals, the beforeTicketRegistrationDeadline ensure tickets cannot be purchased after the draw registration deadline. The issue is that the referral registration happens for the current draw regardless of which draw the tickets are...

If frontend == address(0), 10% of the ticket price is not used as intended

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The function buyTickets, has no check that frontend is not equal to zero address. This is possible if there was some misconfiguration from the frontend side or a player uses this function directly and does not set any address. In this case, the user...

Loss of funds when buying tickets with no frontend

Lines of code Vulnerability details When tickets are bought, the protocol allows to specify a frontend that will receive a percentage of the ticket fee as rewards 10% for the current setup. However, if this input is left empty during purchase, frontend rewards will still be counted and associated...

The _allocBPS field from strategy struct can be 0 this will make the strategy irrevocable

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact No sanity check will make a strategy irrevocable Proof of Concept The addStrategy function can be used to add a strategy, there are multiple sanity checks inside the function however there is missing a very important one, there is no check for allocBPS !...

CommunityIssuance.sol – Stability pool can manipulate time stamps with the fund function to issue more oath than appropriate.

Lines of code Vulnerability details If lastDistributionTime is set to a date in the future, it would allow the issueOath function to continue to mint tokens even after it should have stopped. This is because the if statement in issueOath checks whether the current time is greater than...

Improper Management of Critical Market Condition

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The BorrowerOperations::requireValidAdjustmentInCurrentMode validation function will apply a weak level of validation, causing the system to magnify its critical market conditions when in recovery mode. In detail, both...

Strategist can break the whole protocol

Lines of code Vulnerability details Background There is known attack to ERC4626 vaults, called inflation attacks. It seems that the ReaperVault is not affected since the only depositor will be the ActivePool contract. But what actually the internal function deposituint256 amount, address receiver...

setWithdrawalQueue never removes items from the queue and can get out of gas

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact setWithdrawalQueue calls delete, this sets to 0 each element of the array rather than removing elements what it's done with .pop. After that, strategies are pushed in a for loop, therefore, each time setWithdrawalQueue is called, length of the queue is...

Inexistent Slippage Evaluation

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The ecosystem of Ethos Reserve contains an EIP-4626 implementation of a vault meant to be integrated by its LUSD lending and borrowing system. As per the standard's Security Considerations itself, slippage checks need to be introduced at the integration...

Upgraded Q -> 2 from #3 [1678055596601]

Judge has assessed an item in Issue 3 as 2 risk. The relevant finding follows: L-01 The removeContract function is not properly implemented Impact The contracts array of MaltRepository contract would be messed up, devs and users would not be able to obtain correct contract string names by the...

Upgraded Q -> 2 from #664 [1677633674294]

Judge has assessed an item in Issue 664 as 2 risk. The relevant finding follows: 2- Vault fees can be set greater than 1e18 in the initialize function : The Vaut contract implements 4 types of fees deposit, withdrawal, management, performance collected when the user deposits or withdraw tokens,...

Upgraded Q -> 2 from #823 [1677594201547]

Judge has assessed an item in Issue 823 as 2 risk. The relevant finding follows: L-01 Low level call result not correctly checked The last adminProxy.execute is not checked for success. function deployAdapter DeploymentArgs memory adapterData, bytes memory baseAdapterData, IDeploymentController...

Upgraded Q -> 3 from #460 [1677510923458]

Judge has assessed an item in Issue 460 as 3 risk. The relevant finding follows: Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The safeTransferFrom function on the ClearingHouse is normally used when an OpenSea auction successfully ends and the required ERC20/WETH have been transferred to the...

Users can't remove liquidity while malt price is below peg defend threshold

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The protocol is designed to limit buys while malt price is below peg defend threshold. But it is implemented by blocking any malt token transfer which is originated from the target pool. So it unexpectedly blocks users from removing liquidity too...

Incompatibilty of BackingManager with some tokens.

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The BackingManager contains a grantRTokenAllowance function which is used to grant token allowances to the RToken contract. function grantRTokenAllowanceIERC20 erc20 external notFrozen requireassetRegistry.isRegisterederc20, "erc20 unregistered"; // ==...

Early attacker can DOS rToken issuance

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact An early attacker can DOS the issue functionality in the RToken contract. No issuances can be made. And the DOS cannot be recovered from. It is permanent. Proof of Concept You can add the following test to the Furnace.test.ts file and execute it with yar...

Upgraded Q -> 2 from #157 [1676219053268]

Judge has assessed an item in Issue 157 as 2 risk. The relevant finding follows: L-08 No Storage Gap for BaseSmartAccount and ModuleManager --- The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: All reactions...

Missing owner check in function addTemplate in DeploymentController

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Attacker can add malicous Vaults/Adatpors/Strategies template to TemplateRegistry. Attack can frontrun operator's transaction with the same templateCategory and templateId, but with a malicious Vault/Adatpor/Strategy template. If the operator does not...

Upgraded Q -> 3 from #648 [1675725284542]

Judge has assessed an item in Issue 648 as 3 risk. The relevant finding follows: 1. Incorrect Minter Address Validation in Mint Function Link : Summary: The mint function in the RabbitHoleReceipt contract does not correctly check the msg.sender address for minter permissions. The onlyMinter...

Upgraded Q -> 2 from #670 [1675726386915]

Judge has assessed an item in Issue 670 as 2 risk. The relevant finding follows: L-03 DoS if address owns too many receipts With time it is viable for users to acquire thousands and tens of thousands of receipts. This may happen as a result of buying receipts for example, which was highlighted as...

Upgraded Q -> 2 from #117 [1675572860639]

Judge has assessed an item in Issue 117 as 2 risk. The relevant finding follows: Description If a single address has certain amount of RabbitHoleReceipt tokens receipts - according to tests 1050, when he tries to call claim function from Quest.sol it will always revert with 'Transaction ran out o...

MinipoolManager: node operator can avoid being slashed

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact When staking is done, a Rialto multisig calls MinipoolManager.recordStakingEnd . If the avaxTotalRewardAmt has the value zero, the MinipoolManager will slash the node operator's GGP. The issue is that the amount to slash can be greater than the GGP balan...

nftAddress can be a malicious NFT

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact In the subprotocolregistry contract, users are allowed to register any subprotocols. As long as the supportsinterface condition is met. The validity of the nftaddress address is not checked. function register bool ordered, bool primary, bool active,...

int128 cast underflow in _receiveDripsResult()

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact In receiveDripsResult, the type cast of uint128 could underflow, and result in wrong receivedAmt. The impacts could be: wrong amount being transferred to users and drain the protocol fund inaccurate transfer amount, some users lose fund and some receive...

Upgraded Q -> 2 from #653 [1675442664703]

Judge has assessed an item in Issue 653 as 2 risk. The relevant finding follows: 1. Funds are locked if Rialto use function finishFailedMinipoolByMultisig Detail Function finishFailedMinipoolByMultisig did not transfer any funds or doing any data change, only updating state of minipool to Finishe...

Same identity can be assigned to multiple users

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact In the contest details it is mentioned that identity can be transferable even if it's currently assigned to address in AddressRegistry. However, I would assume that if another address registers it, the identity should be removed from the previous owner...

Unchecked External Call Vulnerability in ownerOf Function Call.

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact In the worst-case scenario, if the ownerOf function call reverts due to a security vulnerability in the ERC721 contract, the caller's data could be manipulated, and their funds could be at risk. This could lead to a loss of funds for users who have...

Unchecked that address to is not 0

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Sanity checks checking that funds are not going to the burn address should be done. In this case in the function swap, funds will not burn because you have to return the flashloan but the check should be made Tools Used manual Recommended Mitigation Step...

The LiquidityManager.pairMintCallback() might be exploited to steal funding from another user when the factory contract is compromised.

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Detailed description of the impact of this finding. The LiquidityManager.pairMintCallback might be exploited to steal funding from another user due to three issues: 1. LiquidityManager.pairMintCallback is a callback function for the addLiquidity, which...

Lack of access control in Lendgine.sol.withdraw()

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Because the function does not check if the person has access to it, anyone can call it. After calling the function the malicious user can increase his position. 175: positions.updatemsg.sender, -SafeCast.toInt256size, rewardPerPositionStored; He can then...

Losses in Pair and LendgineRouter can be generated if used with ERC20 Tokens with fee on transfer

Lines of code Vulnerability details Losses in Pair and LendgineRouter can be generated if used with ERC20 Tokens with fee on transfer Summary Some tokens token1, token0, ... are used over the code that can be any kind of ERC20 token. If this token includes fees on transfer, some operations will...

Multiple combinations of token0/token1 for a given liquidity exist to satisfies the custom variant of AMM pool. A naive LP or Power token holder can transfer more token0/token1 then necessary when minting & burning respectively

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact LP's need to provide a combination of token0 / token 1 for a given liquidity that satisfied a custom variant that satisfies 2 conditions 1. scale1 = c + d where a, b, c, d are functions of token0/ token1 , liquidity and upper bound The relationship betwe...

Upgraded Q -> M from #819 [1675276650768]

Judge has assessed an item in Issue 819 as M risk. The relevant finding follows: If we are going with this specific impact, looks like scenario 2 is valid - but does depend on Rialto making that mistake, so would say that is Medium. This is a duplicate, the primary issue being 723 --- The text wa...

Successful get balance request to victim contract from attack contract and also costing the victim contract gas fees

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Successful get balance request to victim contract from attack contract and also costing the victim contract gas fees One can view the balance of the victim's contract without permission. URL:...

Any user is able to mint a new receipt/ticket tokens

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact In the RabbitHoleReceipt and RabbitHoleTickets contracts the minterAddress should be the only account allowed to mint a new token, but due to an error in the onlyMinter modifier all the users are able to mint new tokens without permission, the impact of...