No way to close multiple channels - Under attack scenario

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact = Currently contract has no functionality to close multiple channels = In case multiple open channels are performing maliciously, owner has to individually call updateChannel to close those channel = Closing channels one by one will be time consuming and...

Cancelled orders cannot be valid again

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The validate function will call the verifyOrderStatus function. When orderStatus.isCancelled == true, the canceled order cannot be set as valid. function verifyOrderStatus bytes32 orderHash, OrderStatus memory orderStatus, bool onlyAllowUnused, bool...

Users can get unlimited votes

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Users can get unlimited votes which leads to them: 1. gaining control over governance 2. getting undeserved rewards 3. having their pools favored due to gauge values Proof of Concept mint calls moveTokenDelegates to set up delegation... File:...

Bribe Rewards Not Claimable By Voters

Lines of code Vulnerability details Background Based on the code of Gauge contract, there are two types of rewards that can be claimed from the Gauge contract by its users. 1. Gauge Rewards - For users Liquidity providers who deposit their LP tokens a.k.a LP Token Staker into the liquidity gauge...

BathPair.sol#rebalancePair() can be front run to steal the pending rebalancing amount

Lines of code Vulnerability details function underlyingBalance public view returns uint256 uint256 pool = IERC20underlyingToken.balanceOfaddressthis; return pool.addoutstandingAmount; function removeFilledTradeAmountuint256 amt external onlyPair outstandingAmount = outstandingAmount.subamt; emit...

DoS on deposit(), incrementLock() and createLock() because of a safeApprove(0)

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Since SafeERC20 is the one implemented by OpenZeppelin, if one checks the code at this address: You will see that the safeApprove executes this validation: require value == 0 || token.allowanceaddressthis, spender == 0, "SafeERC20: approve from non-zero ...

Steal user's first deposit

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Steal user's first deposit Proof of Concept The attack's flow is as following: 1. The first depositor wants to deposit X in bathToken.sol. 2. We detect it and frontrun 2 operations: 1. We deposit 1 of the underlying to the system. In exchange we receive ...

unsafe call using msg.value in loop

Lines of code Vulnerability details description with the function burnToTarget in FeeBurner.sol, a malicious user can swap more funds than they input in ETH if they include multiple address0 in the addresses tokens parameter during the function call, there is a for loop that loops through tokens...

Aura.sol mint() function has a bug in the logic

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Intention is that during inflation period operator will or at least will be able to min EMISSIONSMAXSUPPLY token amount. Due to a logic bug amount of operator mintable tokens directly depends on how many tokens are minted by function minterMint and init...

Rounding-error can be redeemed for free

Originally part of a QA report by gzeon 59 Rounding-error can be redeemed for free If the redeemAmount is 0 but less than the value of 1 share, 0 share will be burned while the user can withdraw non-zero amount. uint256 shares = tokenToSharesredeemAmount; --- The text was updated successfully, bu...

Alchemist can mint AlTokens above their assigned ceiling by calling lowerHasMinted()

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact An alchemist / user can mint more than their alloted amount of AlTokens by calling lowerHasMinted before they reach their minting cap. Proof of Concept Function mint in AlchemicTokenV2Base.sol function mintaddress recipient, uint256 amount external...

DoS in wrap and unwrap

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact the code is doing wrong check, so when things will work it will revert. Proof of Concept In the function wrap there is this lines: if error = ICERC20token.mintamount != NOERROR revert FuseErrorerror; but mint returns the amount that minted, so when error...

TransmuterBuffer.sol calls depositUnderlying with no slippage bounds

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Loss of funds in TransmuterBuffer Proof of Concept If the buffer is called during and unfavorable time then a large portion of deposited funds may be lost due to slippage because deposit is called with 0 as the minimum out allowing any level of slippage...

YieldManager: Uniswap token swaps through fixed path may break yield distribution

Lines of code Vulnerability details Details & Impact All harvested yield tokens are swapped through the Uniswap adapter to USDC. While out of scope, the Uniswap adapter code is relevant here, as I note that the path taken for the swap would be assetFrom - WETH - assetTo unless assetFrom is alread...

Withdrawing ETH collateral with max uint256 amount value reverts transaction

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Withdrawing ETH collateral via the withdrawCollateral function using typeuint256.max for the amount parameter reverts the transaction due to asset being the zero-address and IERC20Detailedasset.decimals not working for native ETH. Proof of Concept...

Fee-on-transfer / rebasing ERC20 cannot be used as underlying

Lines of code Vulnerability details Some ERC20 tokens may have fee-on-transfer or change balance without owner intervention. If these tokens are used as underlying in the protocol they can be lost. Proof of concept Alice creates a vault with a token that has a 1% fee on transfer. She sends...

Loss of funds due to beneficiary override to address(0) during transfer

Lines of code Vulnerability details Premiums or proceeds earned after the transfer will accrue to the zero address, instead of to the new vault owner, and the funds will be irrecoverable. Proof of concept vaultBeneficiariesvaultId is overridden to the zero address during transfer: File: Cally.sol...

Fee on transfer tokens block exercises and withdrawals

Lines of code Vulnerability details Fee on transfer tokens block exercises and withdrawals If a vault is created with a fee-on-transfer ERC20 as its token, the underlying asset may be locked in the contract. Scenario: Setup: 1. Alice calls createVault with a fee-on-transfer token address and 1000...

missing input validation for _liquidityPool

189 comment Warden: kenta missing input validation for liquidityPool. The owner can change always liquidityPool but this liquidityPool will be used to execute low-level calls. To avoid errors with an empty address this must be checked always. requireliquidityPool != address0, “liquidityPool canno...

A malicious user can create a vault that is actually empty

Lines of code Vulnerability details description A malicious user can call the createVault function to create a vault with an ERC20 token that returns false rather than revert on failed transfer. By specifying the tokenType parameter to be ERC721 the transferFrom function will be called rather tha...

Fees in TokenManager.sol:function changeFee() should be upper-bounded

193 comment Warden: Dravee --- The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: All reactions...

Admin has ability to rugpull all tokens

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Currently it is possible for the admin to pull all tokens belonging to the Gravity bridge. In normal circumstances this is probably fine, but if the admin account were compromised this would lead to the bridge being drained of locked funds. Furthermore, ...

ERC20 transfers does not work on non-standard compliant tokens like USDT

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact PermissionlessBasicPoolFactory.sol Consider this function: function deposituint poolId, uint amount external Pool storage pool = poolspoolId; requirepool.id == poolId, 'Uninitialized pool'; requireblock.timestamp pool.startTime, 'Cannot deposit before po...

Not checking returned bool by transfer can lead to loss of funds

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Loss of funds Proof of Concept The ERC20 interface ensures a token transfer will return false on failure. In merkleVesting there is no requirement for this to be true. The contract doesn't ensure all the funds to cover the MerkleTree are present since it...

PermissionlessBasicPoolFactory.sol Does Not Support Reward Tokens With Decimals Other Than 18

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The PermissionlessBasicPoolFactory.sol contract allows anyone to add staking pools which users can participate in to earn reward tokens. Pools are segregated to ensure malicious pools cannot siphon tokens from honest pools. Upon the addition of a new poo...

Users can not initialize and withdraw tokens if coinsPerSecond is 0

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact If a user tries to claim a few totalCoins with a long vestingTime, this user will call the initialize function failed, and can not withdraw funds. Proof of Concept In MerkleResistor.sol L259: uint coinsPerSecond = totalCoins uint100 - tree.pctUpFront /...

decimalMultiplier assumes tokens have <= 18 decimals

Originally submitted by warden StyxRave in 153, duplicate of 49. BkdTriHopCvx.sol decimalMultiplier assumes tokens have = 18 decimals. Will always be 0 for tokens with more than 18 which would be still ERC20 compliant. --- The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: All...

Forget to remove account out of _roleMembers[role]

Originally submitted by warden TrungOre in 89, duplicate of 164. For get to remove account out of roleMembersrole --- The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: All reactions...

setGlobalTax() Can Be Manipulated By The Global Beneficiary To Steal Reward Tokens Or Censor Pool Creators

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Upon pool creation, the pool configures a taxPerCapita value which is controlled by the global beneficiary. This global beneficiary account can effectively sandwich calls to addPool by increasing the fee to 100% before the addition of a new pool and...

Users will pay more than required for NFT Minting

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact NFTs should be sold for their best price without descending into a gas race: Due to SpeedBumpPriceGate.sol function passThruGate code users will pay more than required for NFT Minting. User will pay msg.value and not the NFT "price". It is very likely th...

COMP Distributions Can Be Manipulated And Duplicated Across Any Number Of Accounts

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The updateCompSupplyIndex and distributeSupplierComp functions are used by Compound to track distributions owed to users for supplying funds to the protocol. Bunker protocol is a fork of compound with NFT integration, however, part of the original...

amount requires to be updated to contract balance increase (15)

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Every time transferFrom or transfer function in ERC20 standard is called there is a possibility that underlying smart contract did not transfer the exact amount entered. It is required to find out contract balance increase/decrease after the transfer. Th...

Limit not enforced on teamSummon function

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The docs say there is a cap on how many tokens the project team can mint, however there are no checks or tracking implemented in the teamSummon function to enforce that limit. An admin calling that function could accidentally or maliciously exceed the...

A malicious actor can cause DoS with Block Gas Limit and destroy the sale flow also having advantage of buying cheaper price

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact A malicious actor can cause DoS with Block Gas Limit and mint NFT's on cheaper price as the price drop is in action or destroy the sale flow. Proof of Concept Each block has an upper bound on the amount of gas that can be spent, and thus the amount...

Lack of validation on many important setters can lead to unwanted results

Lines of code Included below Vulnerability details Impact There are several important setter functions that lack validation on either the value itself or the timing on which the function can be called. It seems that the developer intentionally wrote these contracts with flexibility in mind, so I ...

Chainlink latestAnswer has been deprecated

Lines of code PriceOracleImplementation.solL29-L31 Vulnerability details Impact latestAnswer function is deprecated. This function does not revert if no answer has been reached but returns zero. There is no check for stale price and round completeness. Price can be stale and lead to wrong return...

Dutch Auction fails when maxDaSupply is not reached

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Dutch Auction fails when maxDaSupply is not reached Proof of Concept Dutch Auction should update finalPrice every time price decreases. However, currently fianlPrice is updated only when auction reaches full supply reserved for auction phase. 1. Alice bu...

Calculation without check may result in tiny loss of user funds

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Calculation without the bigger than zero check may result in loss of user funds, albeit in tiny amounts as of now. Proof of Concept In this line of redeemToken shares to burn is calculated through tokenToShares method . As there is no check that checks i...

Loss Of Collateral Via Illegitimate Liquidation

Lines of code Vulnerability details Issue: updateLoanParams allows the lender to change the terms of an in-progress loan to lower ltvBPS. removeCollateral calculates whether liquidation is allowed via requirerate.mulloanParams.ltvBPS / BPS amount, "NFT is still valued";. A low or 0 ltvBPS...

[WP-M1] supplyTokenTo() may fail when Aave Pool address changed

Lines of code Vulnerability details function supplyTokenTouint256 depositAmount, address to external override nonReentrant uint256 shares = tokenToSharesdepositAmount; requireshares 0, "AaveV3YS/shares-gt-zero"; address underlyingAssetAddress = tokenAddress;...

Oracle failure allows NFT to be stolen

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Any temporary failure in an oracle relaying a price allows the NFT collateral to be removed by the lender, even if the value of the NFT is still far above the agreed-upon liquidation value. Considering that oracle price retrieval failure is accounted for...

Unchecked oracle return value

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The return value bool success of oracle.get calls is ignored. This could lead to stale data or incorrect prices due to oracle issues. Proof of Concept NFTPairWithOracle.solL287 Change to bool success, uint256 rate = loanParams.oracle.getaddressthis,...

Early Depositor can DOS Deposits

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact A malicious, but generous, early depositor can DOS all future deposits. This is accomplished by directly sending aTokens to the AaveV3YieldSource.sol contract after making their first deposit. The amount of aTokens sent to the contract will manipulate th...

Fund theft in redeemToken() because of rounding in division

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact When user use redeemToken to get his tokens and burn his shares in FeildSource because of rounding in division user's share balance decrease is going to be lower than corresponding withdraw amount in value. for example if token's decimal was 1 and...

User fund loss in supplyTokenTo() because of rounding

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact When user use supplyTokenTo to deposit his tokens and get share in FeildSource because of rounding in division user gets lower amount of share. for example if token's decimal was 1 and totalSupply was 1000 and aToken.balanceOfFieldSource.address was 2100...

claimRewards() didnt follow the safe check effect pattern

Judge @GalloDaSballo has assessed the 2nd item in QA Report 230 as Medium risk. The relevant finding follows: … Impact a user can claim a reward by calling the claimRewards, however this function didnt follow the correct check effect pattern, where the zero address is set after making an external...

Potential Sandwich Attack: Arbitrage bots can front run reward tokens being sent to the liquidity mining contracts

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact For the PARMiner and DemandMiner contracts, arbitrage bots could harvest significant portion of rewards by monitoring MEV, and front run any reward token either a.mimo or par being transferred to the liquidityMining contract i.e. call the deposit functio...

first depositor can drain other depositors

Lines of code Vulnerability details in deposit, when the ratio totalSupply / balance is very high, the amount of the minted shares can round down to zero. Proof of Concept Alice is the first one to deposit in LiquidityPool. she deposits 1 basic unit of the token, therefore minting one lp token...

Lack of safeApprove(0) prevents some registrations, and the changing of stakers and LP tokens

Lines of code Vulnerability details OpenZeppelin's safeApprove will revert if the account already is approved and the new safeApprove is done with a non-zero value function safeApprove IERC20 token, address spender, uint256 value internal // safeApprove should only be called when setting an initi...

Transfer return value is ignored

Impact Some ERC20 tokens, such as USDT, don't revert when transfer/transferFrom fails. The transfer return value has to be checked as there are some other tokens that returns false instead revert. safeTransfer should be used instead of transfer Proof of Concept safeTransferFrom should be used...