[WP-H10] GenericSwapFacet.sol#swapTokensGeneric() duplicated .call{ value: msg.value } makes it possible for the attacker to steal native tokens (ETH) from the contract

Lines of code Vulnerability details function swapTokensGenericLiFiData memory lifiData, LibSwap.SwapData calldata swapData public payable uint256 receivingAssetIdBalance = LibAsset.getOwnBalancelifiData.receivingAssetId; // Swap executeSwapslifiData, swapData; uint256 postSwapBalance =...

Mint spread collateral-less and conjuring collateral claims out of thin air with implicit arithmetic rounding and flawed int to uint conversion

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact This report presents 2 different incorrect behaviour that can affect the correctness of math calculations 1. Unattended Implicit rounding in QuantMath.sol div and mul 2. Inappropriate method of casting integer to unsigned integer in SignedConverter.sol...

Usage of deprecated Chainlink functions

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The Chainlink functions latestAnswer and getAnswer are deprecated. Instead, use the latestRoundData and getRoundData functions. Proof of Concept Go to and search for latestAnswer or getAnswer. You'll find the deprecation notice. Tools Used none Recommend...

Market expiry behaviour differs in implementation and documentation

Lines of code Vulnerability details Description The docs say that “If a market has not settled by its expiry date, it will automatically settle at the lower bound of its Valuation Range.” However, in the implementation, the expiry date is entirely ignored. The default settlement after expiry is a...

No use of upgradeable SafeERC20 contract in Controller.sol

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Controller.sol makes use of Open Zeppelins ReentrancyGuardUpgradeable.sol in the file but does not use an upgradeable version of SafeERC20.sol Proof of Concept Tools Used Manual code review Recommended Mitigation Steps Make use of Open Zeppelins...

Oracle - csanuragjain

Duplicate of 46 --- The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: All reactions...

DDOS - csanuragjain

Duplicate of 119 --- The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: All reactions...

DDOS - Omik

Duplicate of 119 --- The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: All reactions...

Users Can Frontrun Token Distributions Using Flashloans

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The collector suite of contracts will actively send ANC token distributions to staked ANC token holders. However, because it is known beforehand that a distribution will be made to the governance contract, users can abuse this to frontrun distributions b...

[WP-H4] anchor_basset_reward pending yields can be stolen

Lines of code Vulnerability details For yield farming aggregators, if the pending yield on an underlying strategy can be harvested and cause a surge of rewards to all existing investors, especially if the harvest can be triggered permissionlessly. Then the attacker can amplify the attack using a...

Updating the hub’s token contract address may lead to incorrect undelegation amount

Lines of code Vulnerability details Updating the hub’s token contract address may lead to incorrect undelegation amounts Impact The hub contract allows config updates to the tokencontract config values in anchor-bAsset-contracts/contracts/anchorbassethub/src/config.rs Such updates can cause wrong...

Governance Voting Dis-proportionally Favours Users Who Stake And Vote After A Poll Has Been Created And Had Its Snapshot Taken

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Polls are created by targeting the receivecw20 function which is queried whenever the contract receives tokens. By setting the hook message to Cw20HookMsg::CreatePoll, the sender is able to create a poll, assuming the amount sent satisfies the minimum...

Rewards can be stolen from contract

Lines of code Vulnerability details It was observed that executeclaimrewards/executedecreasebalance/executeincreasebalance are missing to update the global index before calculating user rewards in anchorbassetreward contract This can lead to serious consequences: 1. executeincreasebalance functio...

If SChain is Removed Before kill() and getFunds() all Tokens are Locked in the Bridge

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact If the SChain is removed before all the funds are withdrawn from the bridge they will be permanently locked in the bridge. When a SChain is removed in by the SKALE protocol via the function SchainsInternal.removeSchain the data including the owner will b...

Primary seller can avoid paying the primary fee

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact A primary seller can circumvent the 15% fee and pay 5% as a secondary seller. Context The foundation protocol charges a 15% fee if the sale is a primary sale and 5% if it's a secondary sale. There are 2 conditions that must be met for a sale to be...

_getCreatorPaymentInfo() is Not Equipped to Handle Reverts on an Unbounded _recipients Array

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The getCreatorPaymentInfo function is utilised by distributeFunds whenever an NFT sale is made. The function uses try and catch statements to handle bad API endpoints. As such, a revert in this function would lead to NFTs that are locked in the contract...

Rare scenario where seller can steal NFT after an auction by creating an offer for it through reentrancy

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact It's a very specific scenario. The seller auctions off an NFT. If the buyer relists it directly while keeping the token in the escrow, the seller has the opportunity to steal it. They do it by creating an offer for it and accepting it. Proof of Concept...

NFT Creators Can Avoid Paying The Primary Foundation Fee

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The primary foundation fee is charged on the initial sale of newly minted NFTs. However, the isCreator && !nftContractToTokenIdToFirstSaleCompletednftContracttokenId check can easily be bypassed to avoid paying the primary foundation fee by selling the...

Creators can steal sale revenue from owners' sales

Lines of code Vulnerability details According to the README.md All sales in the Foundation market will pay the creator 10% royalties on secondary sales. This is not specific to NFTs minted on Foundation, it should work for any NFT. If royalty information was not defined when the NFT was originall...

[WP-H4] The collateral assets impounded with settleBadDebt() will be frozen in the insuranceFund contract

Lines of code Vulnerability details In MarginAccount.solsettleBadDebt, the collateral assets will be seized and transferred to the insuranceFund contract. However, there is no way for the liquidity providers of the insuranceFund to get back the collateral assets. In the current implementation,...

TurboSafe - should override maxWithdraw and maxRedeem

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Considering the EIP , as withdraw must revert if it is not possible to withdraw assets , it is important to have an accurate maxWithdraw function. However, here, maxWithdraw does not account for the current max withdrawal in the cToken contract. Liquidit...

[WP-M2] Wrong implementation of TurboSafe.sol#less() may cause boosted record value in TurboMaster bigger than actual lead to BoostCapForVault and BoostCapForCollateral to be permanently occupied

Lines of code Vulnerability details // Get out current amount of Fei debt in the Turbo Fuse Pool. uint256 feiDebt = feiTurboCToken.borrowBalanceCurrentaddressthis; // If our debt balance decreased, repay the minimum. // The surplus Fei will accrue as fees and can be sweeped. if feiAmount feiDebt...

Missing Slippage Checks on ClearingHouse._liquidateMaker()

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The liquidateMaker function makes a call to AMM.removeLiquidity but does not provide suitable values for minQuote and minBase. As per the @todo, this call is prone to sandwich attacks, resulting in potentially fewer tokens for the maker. Proof of Concept...

QA Report

1. VUSD.sol - withdrawals list can become too large so normal users will cost more gas to withdraw. Impact Function withdraw do not have check for amount 0, an user can call it infinite time and make withdrawal list too large And because the function processWithdrawals processes withdrawals in...

Ownership of Swap.vy cannot be transferred

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Ownership transfer function of Swap.vy is commented out. Fund can be stuck if an AMM and governance change/upgrade is required. Proof of Concept --- The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: All reactions...

[WP-M3] TurboRouter.sol#createSafeAndDeposit*() CreateSafeAndDeposit combo methods won't work as an allowance cannot be granted to a newly created Safe for deposit

Lines of code Vulnerability details The TurboRouter.soldeposit function can be used in a multicall together with approve and pullToken from PeripheryPayments to pull tokens from msg.sender and grant allowance for the ERC4626 Safe to call asset.safeTransferFrom with the msg.sender being the router...

ClearingHouse fail if too many amm whitelisted

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Governance can whitelist amm in ClearingHouse using the whitelistAmm function. Since a lot of function in the ClearingHouse contract will iterate each of the amm in amms and call various amm.function, if too many amm is whitelisted it is possible for tho...

[WP-M6] Chainlink's latestRoundData might return stale results

Lines of code Vulnerability details function getUnderlyingPriceaddress underlying virtual external view returnsint256 answer if stablePriceunderlying != 0 return stablePriceunderlying; ,answer,,, = AggregatorV3InterfacechainLinkAggregatorMapunderlying.latestRoundData; answer /= 100; uint80 round,...

denial fo service

Lines of code Vulnerability details processWithdrawals can process limited amount in each call. an attacker can push to withdrawals enormous amount of withdrawals with amount = 0. in order to stop the dos attack and process the withdrawal, the governance needs to spend as much gas as the attacker...

TurboRouter: deposit(), mint(), createSafeAndDeposit() and createSafeAndDepositAndBoost() functions do not work

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The TurboRouter contract inherits from the ERC4626RouterBase contract. When the user calls the deposit, mint, createSafeAndDeposit and createSafeAndDepositAndBoost functions of the TurboRouter contract, the deposit and mint functions of the...

canSafeBoostVault() doesn't actually check the feiAmount passed in

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact In TurboMaster.sol the onSafeBoost function calls canSafeBoostVault on the booster contract to check if the safe is allowed to boost the vault using the feiAmount which is passed in by the caller as an argument. The problem is that the feiAmount is never...

NestedFactory.addOperator/removeOperator have no effect until importOperators

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact addOperator/removeOperator being run alone don't have any effect, as the cache is used in operations, which is only updated when an implementation is added or removed via importOperators. If an operation is added via addOperator, but importOperators isn'...

Wrong logic around areOperatorsImported

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The logic related to the areOperatorsImported method is incorrect and can cause an operator not to be updated because the owner thinks it is already updated, and a vulnerable or defective one can be used. Proof of Concept The operators mapping is made up...

Potential for reentrancy on USDMPegRecovery.sol:withdraw()

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Re-entrancy Proof of Concept File: USDMPegRecovery.sol 110: function withdrawLiquidity calldata withdrawal external 111: Liquidity memory total = totalLiquidity; 112: Liquidity memory user = userLiquiditymsg.sender; 113: ifwithdrawal.usdm 0 114:...

ConvexStakingWrapper._calcRewardIntegral() Has An Accounting Error When Updating reward.remaining

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The ConvexStakingWrapper.sol implementation makes several modifications to the original design. One of the key changes is the way rewards are distributed to stakers. A new ConcurRewardPool.sol contract is used to store rewards, allowing users to claim...

unsafe cast can lead to theft

Lines of code Vulnerability details in the first link I provided, a hacker can call withdraw with amount = 2196, the amount of shares that will be burned is uint1922192 == 0. if the system has enough money, the hacker can steal 2192 tokens and pay nothing. for the second link, a user that provide...

Owner never calls finalize() = rug pull

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact In order for users to claim their promised tokenOut tokens, the contract owner must call the finalize function. If the owner never calls the finalize function, no user can call the claim function to get their tokens. The owner can call the sweep function...

sNOTE Holders Are Not Incetivized To Vote On Proposals To Call extractTokensForCollateralShortfall

Handle leastwood Vulnerability details Impact As sNOTE have governance voting rights equivalent to the token amount in NOTE, users who stake their NOTE are also able to vote on governance proposals. In the event a majority of NOTE is staked in the sNOTE contract, it doesn't seem likely that stake...

FarmingPools.sol Some users may not be able to get back their funds for tokens with tax on transfer

Handle WatchPug Vulnerability details Per the doc: Token with tax and rewards should accounted correctly and share with all holder accordingly. In the current implementation of FarmingPools.solstake, it assumes that the received amount is the same as the transfer amount, and recording it to...

Slippage protection

Handle pauliax Vulnerability details Impact Consider adding a configurable slippage parameter here to prevent users suffering from sandwitch bots: minAmountsOut0 = 0; minAmountsOut1 = 0; IVault.ExitPoolRequest ... minAmountsOut and used in both sNOTE and TreasuryManager contracts:...

Two pairs can have same tokens

Handle sirhashalot Vulnerability details Impact The createLPoolPair function in ControllerV1.sol tries to prevent a pair from being create if it already exists. It does this with the statement requirelpoolPairstoken0token1.lpool0 == address0 || lpoolPairstoken1token0.lpool0 == address0, 'pool pai...

Lack of access control in the parameterize function of proposal contracts

Handle shw Vulnerability details Impact Most of the proposal contracts have a parameterize function for setting the proposal parameters, and these functions are protected only by the notCurrent modifier. When the proposal is proposed through a lodgeProposal transaction, an attacker can front-run...

Chainlink oracles might return stale data

Handle hack3r-0m Vulnerability details Location: DAI.latestRoundData returns data from the latest round, but there is no guarantee that the latest round happened frequently, it might be a case where latestRoundData has happened 1 hour or 1 day ago. This can lead to stale data used for calculation...

Cvx3CrvOracle does not check that Chainlink data is fresh.

Handle TomFrenchBlockchain Vulnerability details Impact Usage of stale prices when querying chainlink oracles. Proof of Concept Cvx3CrvOracle queries chainlink oracles for the prices of DAI, USDC and USDT, however it doesn't require that the response is fresh by checking which round the answer wa...

Malicious Users Can Duplicate Protocol Earned Yield By Transferring wCVX Tokens To Another Account

Handle leastwood Vulnerability details Impact ConvexYieldWrapper.sol is a wrapper contract for staking convex tokens on the user's behalf, allowing them to earn rewards on their deposit. Users will interact with the Ladle.sol contract's batch function which: Approves Ladle to move the tokens...

admin is not set in any function

Handle rfa Vulnerability details Impact all function that need to validate msg.sender == admin cannot be run. BscDexAggregator.sol Proof of Concept BscDexAggregator.sol is the child contract of Adminable.sol. some function in it need to validate that msg.sender is admin. There is no function that...

_supportDexs array length not checked in constructor

Handle jayjonah8 Vulnerability details Impact In OpenLevDelegator.sol an array of supportDexs is passed to the constructor function and then passed to the delegateTo function but the supportDexs arrays length is not checked which can result in costly errors. Proof of Concept Tools Used Manual cod...

The amount of tokens received by the pool might be less than expected for feeOnTransfer tokens

Handle UncleGrandpa925 Vulnerability details Impact This issue impacts any pools that use fee-on-transfer quoteTokens. The codebase is inspired by Uniswap, with one important change: the router is built right into the pool themselves. In addLiquidity, after having updated all internal parameters...

Anyone can withdraw others

Handle robee Vulnerability details Anyone can withdraw users shares. Although we think that they are sent to the right address, it is still 1 not the desired behavior 2 can be dangerous if the receiver is a smart contract 3 the receiver may not know someone withdraw him...

Owner can set arbitrary premium which allow nonStakers drain funds

Handle wuwe1 Vulnerability details Impact Owner can set arbitrary premium, this will cause protocol lose all the activeBalance, stakers lose all the claimable premium and nonStakers can drain all the usdc. Proof of Concept setProtocolPremium does not check the value of premium. premium can be...