investedAssets ignores fees and can cause insolvency

Handle danb Vulnerability details investedAssets doesn't substract the fees owed to the treasury, this makes the system think that it has more than it really has. Proof of Concept consider the following scenario: perfFeePct is 20%. the system generated 1M dollars yield in aust that it didn't rede...

safeDecimals can revert causing DoS

Handle sirhashalot Vulnerability details Impact The safeDecimals function, found in the SafeMetadata.sol contract and called in 3 different Timeswap Convenience contracts, can cause a revert. This is because the safeDecimals function attempts to use abi.decode to return a uint8 when data.length =...

Governor can steal funds from vaults

Handle 0x0x0x Vulnerability details reclaimTokens function is as follows function reclaimTokensaddress to, address memory tokens external nonReentrant requirenft 0, ExceptionsLibrary.INITIALIZATION; IProtocolGovernance governance = vaultGovernance.internalParams.protocolGovernance; bool...

Possible price manipulation while adding liquidity to uniV3

Handle 0x421f Vulnerability details Right now if we see the code there are no checks before liq being added to check if pool is manipulated. Hence there rises possibility of sandwich attack vector here, more so with concentrated liq imo Could be done with flash loan or with own tokens Attack woul...

Tokens can be stolen when depositToken == rewardToken

Handle cmichel Vulnerability details The Streaming contract allows the deposit and reward tokens to be the same token. I believe this is intended, think Sushi reward on Sushi as is the case with xSushi. The reward and deposit balances are also correctly tracked independently in depositTokenAmount...

ArbitraryCall() allows attackers to steal ERC20 tokens from users wallets

Handle Jujic Vulnerability details A call to an arbitrary contract with custom calldata is made in arbitraryCalladdress who, bytes memory data, which means the contract can be an ERC20 token, and the calldata can be transferFrom a previously approved user. Impact The wallet balances for the amoun...

Locke.sol:Stream - possible DOS on arbitraryCall

Handle ScopeLift Vulnerability details Impact If there's an airdrop that arbitraryCall would like to call, it could be DOSed by first calling createIncentive with the airdropped token, then backrunning calls to claimIncentive with calls to createIncentive. Proof of Concept Tools Used Recommended...

splitReinvest() can be front run

Handle WatchPug Vulnerability details function splitReinvestuint256 rewardLiquidity external retrieveRewardrewardLiquidity; uint256 rewardBalance = rewardToken.balanceOfaddressthis; rewardToken.safeTransferaddressdexHandler, rewardBalance.div2; dexHandler.buyMalt; bondAccountmsg.sender; emit...

Malicious user can DOS lock by falsely reaching maxNumberOfKeys using shareKey

Handle kenzo Vulnerability details A malicious user can call shareKey repeatedly, transferring miniscule amounts of his key to different accounts, thereby minting new keys until maxNumberOfKeys is reached. Impact Malicious user can grief and make lock purchasing become disabled. Proof of Concept ...

Unclear TwapOracle.consult algorithm

Handle cmichel Vulnerability details The TWAPOracle.consult function is unclear to the auditor. It seems to iterate through all registered pairs that share the token parameter USDV or VADER and then sums up the foreign token pair per token price. And divides this sum sumNative by the summed-up US...

Unchecked low level calls

Handle Reigada Vulnerability details Impact The return value of these low-level calls are not checked, so if the call fails, the Ether will be locked in the contract. Setting the risk as medium as the smart contract has no function to withdraw the Ether. This Ether would remain stuck in the...

Trades where toToken is feeOnTransferToken might send user less tokens than finalAmountMin

Handle kenzo Vulnerability details Slingshot's executeTrades checks that the trade result amount to be sent to the user is bigger than finalAmountMin, and after that sends the user the amount. But if the token charges fee on transfer, the final transfer to the user will decrease the amount the us...

Admin can abuse grantSlingshot and steal user funds

Handle kenzo Vulnerability details After user has .approved ApprovalHandler, admin can grantSlingshot himself, and then call ApprovalHandler.transferFrom with parameters that will transfer all tokens to himself before the user calls Slingshot's executeTrades. Although this vulnerability requires ...

transferFrom amount may exceed allowance

Handle WatchPug Vulnerability details function transferFromaddress sender, address recipient, uint256 amount public virtual override returns bool /// @dev the balances mapping represents the underlying ibBTC shares "non-rebased balances" /// @dev the naming confusion is due to maintaining origina...

transfer() is not recommended for sending ETH

Handle WatchPug Vulnerability details Since the introduction of transfer, it has typically been recommended by the security community because it helps guard against reentrancy attacks. This guidance made sense under the assumption that gas costs wouldn’t change. It's now recommended that transfer...

Change in interest rate can disable repay of loan

Handle pmerkleplant Vulnerability details Impact The ability of a borrower to repay a loan is disabled if the interest rate is set too high by the InterestRateModel. However, there is neither a check when setting the interest rate nor an indication in the IInterestRateModel's specs of this...

Unable to redeem rest funds if deposited reward is not multiplier of allocatedTokensPerEpoch

Handle xYrYuYx Vulnerability details Impact Owner will deposit any amount of reward if amount is greater than allocatedTokensPerEpoch. This means that it is possible that owner can sent amount which is not multiplier of allocatedTokensPerEpoch. For example, when allocatedTokensPerEpoch is 1 CQT,...

Router's complexPath percentagePaths don't work as expected

Handle cmichel Vulnerability details The TridentRouter.complexPath function allows splitting a trade result into several buckets and trade them in a different pool each. The distribution is defined by the params.percentagePathi.balancePercentage values: for uint256 i; i...

Incorrect data location specifier can be abused to cause DoS and fund loss

Handle 0xRajeev Vulnerability details Impact The withdrawBounty loops through the bounties array looking for active bounties and transferring amounts from active ones. However, the data location specifier used for bounty is memory which makes a copy of the bounties array member instead of a...

PostAuctionLauncher's liquidity provision can be exploited

Handle cmichel Vulnerability details The PostAuctionLauncher.finalize function takes the raised payment token amounts and uses previously provided auction token amounts to provide liquidity to a Sushiswap pool after an auction has successfully been finalized. It provides this liquidity at a...

Strategy.sol: startPool() can possibly be flashloaned

Handle hickuphh3 Vulnerability details Impact Since startPool is callable by anyone, an attacker can flash loan to first imbalance the pool, get the strategy to deposit in the imbalanced ratio, then rebalance the pool to the original ratio, thus causing the strategy to suffer from impermanent los...

reputation risk via upgradable contracts

Handle gpersoon Vulnerability details Impact The contract SwappableYieldSource is upgradable. This means the owner could upgrade and change the contract so any new functionality. Amongst others the owner could retrieve all the tokens of the Yieldsource and transfer them out. The project could sti...

Unchecked transfers found in 3 contracts

Handle maplesyrup Vulnerability details Impact This is a high priority vulnerability because it definitely affects the way that funds are transferred and sent between the contracts. You want to make sure that you check the boolean value from these transfer functions in order to make sure that the...

Router.removeLiquidityExact(uint256,address) has unchecked transfers

Handle heiho1 Vulnerability details Impact Router.removeLiquidityExactuint256,address line 114 does not check the boolean return of a token transfer. This is a brittle implementation because it relies on the boolean return value being hard-coded to true. Tokens may not revert in case of failure a...

Transactions nearing block.gaslimit may cause issues

Handle hrkrshnn Vulnerability details transactions nearing block.gaslimit may cause issues A general problem with schemes that require multiple steps and whose inputs are dynamically typed is that: a user may be able to "commit" something, but never "execute" it because the "execute" transaction...

Malicious owner can drain the market at any time using SafetyWithdraw

Handle 0xRajeev Vulnerability details Impact The withdrawERC20Token in SafetyWithdraw inherited in TracerPerpetualSwaps is presumably a guarded launch emergency withdrawal mechanism. However, given the trust model where the market creator/owner is potentially untrusted/malicious, this is a...

Missing events for critical parameter changing operations by owner

Handle 0xRajeev Vulnerability details Impact The owner of TracerPerpetualSwaps contract, who is potentially untrusted as per specification, can change the market critical parameters such as the addresses of the Liquidation/Pricing/Insurance/GasOracle/FeeReceiver and also critical values such as...

delegatedTransferERC20() on line 442 of Visor.sol, able to get locked erc20 tokens

Handle Sherlock Vulnerability details Impact Because of getBalanceLocked not returning the full sum of the balances, if you have the approval you are able to transfer locked erc20 tokens. Proof of Concept Tools Used Hardhat Recommended Mitigation Steps Calculate balance using balance.add...

Unhandled return value of transferFrom in timeLockERC20() could lead to fund loss for recipients

Handle 0xRajeev Vulnerability details Impact ERC20 implementations are not always consistent. Some implementations of transfer and transferFrom could return ‘false’ on failure instead of reverting. It is safer to wrap such calls into require statements or use safe wrapper functions implementing...

Initialization can be front-run in DAO.sol

Handle 0xRajeev Vulnerability details Impact Given the public access, this is susceptible to front-running by an attacker who can initialize this with arbitrary assets before the deployer. Reinitialization will require contract redeployment because initialization can be done only once. Reference:...

Upgraded Q -> 2 from #549 [1704652745528]

Judge has assessed an item in Issue 549 as 2 risk. The relevant finding follows: L-02 The first piece created can pass quorumVotes without any votes if totalSupply of ERC20 votes is zero --- The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: All reactions...

Lack of receive() inside MoneyMarketHook contract when interacting with WNATIVE.

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact MoneyMarketHook is expected to work with the native balance when interacting with WNATIVE, especially when params.returnNative is set to true during the execute operation. However, due to the lack of a receive function inside the contract, MoneyMarketHoo...

Efficiency

Lines of code Vulnerability details Depending on the size of your heap, the while loop may execute a significant number of times. Consider whether you can optimize this loop for performance, especially if you expect a large number of insertions. Assessed type Loop --- The text was updated...

A wLP collateral that is no longer whitelisted but was at some point won't let users decollateralize or be liquidated

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Users who collateralized using wLP won't ever be liquidated unless the wLP is whitelisted back, but this could be dangerous depending on the reason it was removed from the whitelist. They can't also decollateralize. The severity of this issue depends...

reclaimLiquidity() Malicious borrowers can force LPs to be unable to retrieve Liquidity by closing and reopening the Position before it expires.

Lines of code Vulnerability details Vulnerability details If LP wants to retrieve the Liquidity that has been lent out, it can set a renewalCutoffTime through reclaimLiquidity. If the borrower does not voluntarily close, liquidatePosition can be used to forcibly close the position after the loan...

Signature Verification for voteForManyWithSig Function

Lines of code Vulnerability details Potential Risk: The voteForManyWithSig function in the CultureIndex contract allows users to vote on multiple pieceIds using a provided signature. While it attempts to verify the signature, there are some potential risks associated with signature verification...

If the NFT is because the auction is not met the reservePrice in _settleAuction() function, during the auction the totalSupply of erc721VotingToken is get in the quorumVotes, leading that the piece cannot be drpped

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Detailed description of the impact of this finding. Proof of Concept Provide direct links to all referenced code in GitHub. Add screenshots, logs, or any other relevant proof that illustrates the concept. Tools Used Recommended Mitigation Steps Assessed...

Contracts are vulnerable to fee-on-transfer accounting-related issues

Lines of code 359, 448, 509, 530, 42, 797, 162 Vulnerability details The functions below transfer funds from the caller to the receiver via transferFrom, but do not ensure that the actual number of tokens received is the same as the input amount to the transfer. If the token is a fee-on-transfer...

addRewardToken() does note remove old entries before adding new ones

Lines of code 455, 280, 378, 411 Vulnerability details Each time addRewardToken is called, new entries are added to the array, but doing so does not remove any old entries. By calling the function multiple times, an attacker can can increase their voting power indefinitely, without having to...

Users can add 6 decimal token funds for free

Lines of code Vulnerability details There is a logic error in convertDecimals function which means wrapping interactions for tokens with less than 18 decimals are processed incorrectly. The below is triggered in convertDecimals where the input parameter decimals is less than 18. If amountToConver...

Core function of Ocean contract like doInteraction | doMultipleInteractions | forwardedDoInteraction may revert under certain conditions

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Core functions like doInteraction, forwardedDoInteraction, doMultipleInteractions, forwardedDoMultipleInteractions etc, will always revert under certain conditions due to overflow in calculations. Proof of Concept Core external functions like doInteracti...

Reentrancy in mint function leads to various problems

Lines of code Mint function in minter contract: Mint function in core contract: Vulnerability details Bug Description When minting NFTs, users will using the mint function. This function will mint a NFT using the safeMint function. The problem is that this mint will be done before crucial variabl...

Event Emission

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Events such as Swap, Deposit, and Withdraw are emitted with the primitive address as the user parameter, which might not be the actual user msg.sender initiating the transaction. Proof of Concept Provide direct links to all referenced code in GitHub. Add...

Unsafe use of transfer()/transferFrom() with IERC20

Lines of code 377, 509, 491, 530, 42, 50 Vulnerability details Impact Some tokens do not implement the ERC20 standard properly but are still accepted by most code that accepts ERC20 tokens. For example Tether USDT's transfer and transferFrom functions on L1 do not return booleans as the...

Return values of approve() not checked

Lines of code 321, 215, 184, 450, 761, 217, 157, 234, 339, 386https://github.com/Tapioca-DAO/t...

Array is push()ed but not pop()ed, and is iterated over

Lines of code 96, 485, 485, 485, 485, 485, 485, 485, 485, 485, 485https://github.com/Tapioca-DAO/ta...

Fee for minting the Market Nft token can be manipulated

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Fee of minting the Market's NFT is calculated based on total share count tokenCount. Such approach opens a way to collect big fees for fee recipients by deliberately stacking share tokens. address bondingCurve = shareDataid.bondingCurve; uint256...

payable.transfer() call will result in loss of unused Ether

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact batchContribute function carries out funding and transfer in batches by using the payable.transfer call. This is unsafe as transfer has hard coded gas budget and can fail when the user is a smart contract. This way programmatical usage of batchContribute...

A malicious contributor can increase voting power maliciously and eventually steal funds!

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Unlimited voting power for attacker and stealing of funds ! Proof of Concept All of the contribute functions uses msg.value to calculate the votingpower . For example , contribute function looks like this : function contribute uint256 tokenId, address...

No token whitelist leaves rageQuit() vulnerable to malicious ERC20 token contracts

Lines of code Vulnerability details A malicious actor can exploit the PartyGovernanceNFT.sol::rageQuit function by specifying a malicious IERC20 contract in the withdrawTokens array. The malicious contract could "donate" tokens to the proxy contract to pass the balance check here and when the...