SUSE CVE-2020-8122

A missing check in Nextcloud Server 14.0.3 could give recipient the possibility to extend the expiration date of a share they received...

SUSE CVE-2020-28017

Exim 4 before 4.94.2 allows Integer Overflow to Buffer Overflow in receiveaddrecipient via an e-mail message with fifty million recipients. NOTE: remote exploitation may be difficult because of resource consumption...

SUSE CVE-2020-28022

Exim 4 before 4.94.2 has Improper Restriction of Write Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer. This occurs when processing name=value pairs within MAIL FROM and RCPT TO commands...

DEBIAN-CVE-2023-0215

The public API function BIOnewNDEF is a helper function used for streaming ASN.1 data via a BIO. It is primarily used internally to OpenSSL to support the SMIME, CMS and PKCS7 streaming capabilities, but may also be called directly by end user applications. The function receives a BIO from the...

Malicious user can send the quest reward tokens to the protocol fee contract preventing users from claiming their rewards.

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Malicious user can take advantage of the function withdrawFee after the quest end time and successfuly send the quest reward tokens to the protocol fee contract preventing users from claiming their rewards. Proof of Concept Every receipt minted should...

withdrawFee should only be allowed to called once.

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact In the current implementation, the function withdrawFee can be called multiple times. It should only be allowed to called once. Calling more than once would let owner steal from legit users as there won’t be enough funds left for legit users to claim...

PT-2023-14816 · Discourse · Discourse

Name of the Vulnerable Software and Affected Versions: Discourse versions prior to 2.8.14 on the stable branch and version 2.9.0.beta15 on the beta and tests-passed branches Description: Discourse is an open-source discussion platform. Prior to the specified versions, recipients of a group SMTP...

function buyAndReduceDebt() spend more underlying token than user specified and also code doesn't check that swapFeeBips is less than BIPS_ONE and user can lose some of his underlying token balance that he gave protocol spending approval

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact user can specify fee recipient and fee amount to send to that recipient and it is calculated by amount swapFeeBips / BIPSONE but there is no check in the code to make sure swapFeeBips is less than BIPSONE and if user set wrong value by mistake or client...

winnerClaimNFT() does not check if recipient can receive ERC721

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact In src\VRFNFTRandomDraw.sol winnerClaimNFT, you should use safeTransferFrom to protect against the case that the recipient cannot receive the ERC721 tokens, and thus will lose the tokens. This is more-so the case when we expect that normal users will be...

Wrong variable is used for the first parameter of depositHook.hook()

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Recipient is treated wrongly as sender. Proof of Concept As written here See DepositHook.solL43-L52, the first accepted parameter should be the sender. However, recipient See Collateral.solL53 is passed in here. Tools Used Manual Recommended Mitigation...

The recipient address check during handling register events will confuse users and block the users contracts registering

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The check about if the receiver account exists in the evm store doesn't make sense and will cause users to encounter a confusing exception. And the RegisterEvent function will not throw an exception to revert the tx, the source contract will be wrote in...

The _recipient address has no limits to the amount of tokenID (NFTs) it can own

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Since the recipient address has no limit to the number of tokenIds it can hold, this makes it possible for an attacker to call the register function many times with different addresses and send many tokenIds to the same recipient, which could cause a...

Funds are locked if can’t transfer reward to recipient in withdraw

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact When recipient not able to received reward when call withdraw, as natspec: If contract is using proxy pattern, it's possible to register retroactively, however past fees will be lost. We not handle that case to get locked funds back. We should add...

CVE-2021-31739

The SEPPmail solution is vulnerable to a Cross-Site Scripting vulnerability XSS, because user input is not correctly encoded in HTML attributes when returned by the server.SEPPmail 11.1.10 allows XSS via a recipient address...

Cross site scripting

The SEPPmail solution is vulnerable to a Cross-Site Scripting vulnerability XSS, because user input is not correctly encoded in HTML attributes when returned by the server.SEPPmail 11.1.10 allows XSS via a recipient address...

CVE-2021-31739

The SEPPmail solution is vulnerable to a Cross-Site Scripting vulnerability XSS, because user input is not correctly encoded in HTML attributes when returned by the server.SEPPmail 11.1.10 allows XSS via a recipient address...

CVE-2021-31739

The SEPPmail solution is vulnerable to a Cross-Site Scripting vulnerability XSS, because user input is not correctly encoded in HTML attributes when returned by the server.SEPPmail 11.1.10 allows XSS via a recipient address...

Direct theft of buyers ETH funds.

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Most severe issue: A Seller or Fee recipient can steal ETH funds from the buyer when he is making a single or bulk execution. Direct theft of funds. Additional impacts that can be caused by these bugs: 1. Seller or Fee recipient can cause next in line...

CVE-2022-26088

An issue was discovered in BMC Remedy before 22.1. Email-based Incident Forwarding allows remote authenticated users to inject HTML such as an SSRF payload into the Activity Log by placing it in the To: field. This affects rendering that occurs upon a click in the "number of recipients" field...

BMC Software BMC Remedy 跨站脚本漏洞

BMC Software BMC Remedy is a software application from BMC Software, Inc. It provides off-the-shelf IT Information Library ITIL service support functionality. A security vulnerability exists in BMC Software BMC Remedy prior to version 22.1, which stems from an email-based event forwarding that...