Using LensBaseERC721::_safeTransfer may lead to tokens being locked forever

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact As we are all aware of, the OZ Address.sol function isContract can be bypassed because as the docs says: It is unsafe to assume that an address for which this function returns false is an externally-owned account EOA and not a contract. Among others,...

Blacklisted Address Can Exploit the Exchange

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Addresses that are blacklisted for popular ERC20 tokens such as USDC, USDT can be leveraged to exploit the exchange in a number of ways. These addresses cannot be liquidated in any case where they would be transferred back a leftover collateral amount in...

ownCloud: Federated share permissions can be increased by recipient

The federated share permissions in Nextcloud allowed recipients to increase their permissions by sending a request to the server with the share token and ID, resulting in a security vulnerability...

Skipping indices of malicious strategies does not work

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact In src/contracts/core/StrategyManager.solL536 parameter indicesToSkip per documentation: """exists so that, e.g., if the slashed QueuedWithdrawal contains a malicious strategy in the strategies array which always reverts on calls to its 'withdraw'...

Upgraded Q -> 2 from #882 [1683052816154]

Judge has assessed an item in Issue 882 as 2 risk. The relevant finding follows: If royaltyFee 0 and recipient == address0 users will be overcharged --- The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: All reactions...

Thunderbird: Revocation status of S/Mime recipient certificates was not checked

The Mozilla Foundation Security Advisory describes this flaw as: OCSP revocation status of recipient certificates was not checked when sending S/Mime encrypted email, and revoked certificates would be accepted. Thunderbird versions from 68 to 102.9.1 were affected by this bug...

Thunderbird: Revocation status of S/Mime recipient certificates was not checked

The Mozilla Foundation Security Advisory describes this flaw as: OCSP revocation status of recipient certificates was not checked when sending S/Mime encrypted email, and revoked certificates would be accepted. Thunderbird versions from 68 to 102.9.1 were affected by this bug...

Thunderbird: Revocation status of S/Mime recipient certificates was not checked

The Mozilla Foundation Security Advisory describes this flaw as: OCSP revocation status of recipient certificates was not checked when sending S/Mime encrypted email, and revoked certificates would be accepted. Thunderbird versions from 68 to 102.9.1 were affected by this bug...

Thunderbird: Revocation status of S/Mime recipient certificates was not checked

The Mozilla Foundation Security Advisory describes this flaw as: OCSP revocation status of recipient certificates was not checked when sending S/Mime encrypted email, and revoked certificates would be accepted. Thunderbird versions from 68 to 102.9.1 were affected by this bug...

Mozilla Thunderbird 信任管理问题漏洞

Mozilla Thunderbird is the United States Mozilla Foundation's set of independent from the Mozilla Application Suite e-mail client software. The program supports IMAP, POP mail protocols and HTML mail format. A security vulnerability exists in Mozilla Thunderbird, which can be exploited to conduct...

UBUNTU-CVE-2023-0547

OCSP revocation status of recipient certificates was not checked when sending S/Mime encrypted email, and revoked certificates would be accepted. Thunderbird versions from 68 to 102.9.1 were affected by this bug. This vulnerability affects Thunderbird 102.10...

ETHCrowdfundBase.sol: all funds are lost when fee recipient cannot receive ETH

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact In the ETHCrowdfundBase contract a fundingSplitRecipient address is configured which receives a percentage of the funds in case the crowdfund is won. Neither the fundingSplitRecipient address nor the fundingSplitBps percentage can be changed. The issue i...

Upgraded Q -> 2 from #60 [1679803335439]

Judge has assessed an item in Issue 60 as 2 risk. The relevant finding follows: LiquidityPool.sol: If the fee recipient is not set then all LP operations such as deposits and withdrawals will fail. Consider making fee transfers optional depending on whether a fee recipient and percentage is set -...

set critical parameters like fee recipient in constrctor.

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Loss of fee at certain condition. This can happen, when user call deposit function immediately contracts are deployed. Or when admin forget to update the feeReceient address. There are lot of address that admin has to set once the contract is deployed. S...

Potential Risk of Accidentally Minting Tokens to Incorrect Accounts

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact 1. the Intended recipient of the tokens might not receive them, which could lead to a loss of funds or a delay in the intended use of the tokens 2. incorrect account holder could receive the tokens by mistake, leading to a discrepancy in the total token...

Upgraded Q -> 2 from #523 [1677626174331]

Judge has assessed an item in Issue 523 as 2 risk. The relevant finding follows: Title Add function for feeRecipient change in MultiRewardEscrow.sol contract Links to affected code Vulnerability details Impact If account feeRecipient would be compromised, or the protocol owner wants from some oth...

SUSE CVE-2007-4560

clamav-milter in ClamAV before 0.91.2, when run in black hole mode, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands via shell metacharacters that are used in a certain popen call, involving the "recipient field of sendmail."...

SUSE CVE-2013-4166

The gpgctxaddrecipient function in camel/camel-gpg-context.c in GNOME Evolution 3.8.4 and earlier and Evolution Data Server 3.9.5 and earlier does not properly select the GPG key to use for email encryption, which might cause the email to be encrypted with the wrong key and allow remote attackers...

SUSE CVE-2014-1571

Bugzilla 2.x through 4.0.x before 4.0.15, 4.1.x and 4.2.x before 4.2.11, 4.3.x and 4.4.x before 4.4.6, and 4.5.x before 4.5.6 allows remote authenticated users to obtain sensitive private-comment information by leveraging a role as a flag recipient, related to Bug.pm, Flag.pm, and a mail template...

SUSE CVE-2019-10149

A flaw was found in Exim versions 4.87 to 4.91 inclusive. Improper validation of recipient address in delivermessage function in /src/deliver.c may lead to remote command execution...