The _recipient address has no limits to the amount of tokenID (NFTs) it can own

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Since the recipient address has no limit to the number of tokenIds it can hold, this makes it possible for an attacker to call the register function many times with different addresses and send many tokenIds to the same recipient, which could cause a...

The recipient address check during handling register events will confuse users and block the users contracts registering

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The check about if the receiver account exists in the evm store doesn't make sense and will cause users to encounter a confusing exception. And the RegisterEvent function will not throw an exception to revert the tx, the source contract will be wrote in...

Funds are locked if can’t transfer reward to recipient in withdraw

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact When recipient not able to received reward when call withdraw, as natspec: If contract is using proxy pattern, it's possible to register retroactively, however past fees will be lost. We not handle that case to get locked funds back. We should add...

CVE-2021-31739

The SEPPmail solution is vulnerable to a Cross-Site Scripting vulnerability XSS, because user input is not correctly encoded in HTML attributes when returned by the server.SEPPmail 11.1.10 allows XSS via a recipient address...

Cross site scripting

The SEPPmail solution is vulnerable to a Cross-Site Scripting vulnerability XSS, because user input is not correctly encoded in HTML attributes when returned by the server.SEPPmail 11.1.10 allows XSS via a recipient address...

CVE-2021-31739

The SEPPmail solution is vulnerable to a Cross-Site Scripting vulnerability XSS, because user input is not correctly encoded in HTML attributes when returned by the server.SEPPmail 11.1.10 allows XSS via a recipient address...

CVE-2021-31739

The SEPPmail solution is vulnerable to a Cross-Site Scripting vulnerability XSS, because user input is not correctly encoded in HTML attributes when returned by the server.SEPPmail 11.1.10 allows XSS via a recipient address...

Direct theft of buyers ETH funds.

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Most severe issue: A Seller or Fee recipient can steal ETH funds from the buyer when he is making a single or bulk execution. Direct theft of funds. Additional impacts that can be caused by these bugs: 1. Seller or Fee recipient can cause next in line...

CVE-2022-26088

An issue was discovered in BMC Remedy before 22.1. Email-based Incident Forwarding allows remote authenticated users to inject HTML such as an SSRF payload into the Activity Log by placing it in the To: field. This affects rendering that occurs upon a click in the "number of recipients" field...

BMC Software BMC Remedy 跨站脚本漏洞

BMC Software BMC Remedy is a software application from BMC Software, Inc. It provides off-the-shelf IT Information Library ITIL service support functionality. A security vulnerability exists in BMC Software BMC Remedy prior to version 22.1, which stems from an email-based event forwarding that...

PT-2022-10050 · Seppmail · Seppmail

Name of the Vulnerable Software and Affected Versions: SEPPmail version 11.1.10 Description: The issue arises from incorrect encoding of user input in HTML attributes when returned by the server, leading to a Cross-Site Scripting XSS vulnerability. This allows XSS via a recipient address...

CVE-2022-31122

Wire is an encrypted communication and collaboration platform. Versions prior to 2022-07-12/Chart 4.19.0 are subject to Token Recipient Confusion. If an attacker has certain details of SAML IdP metadata, and configures their own SAML on the same backend, the attacker can delete all SAML...

Design/Logic Flaw

Wire is an encrypted communication and collaboration platform. Versions prior to 2022-07-12/Chart 4.19.0 are subject to Token Recipient Confusion. If an attacker has certain details of SAML IdP metadata, and configures their own SAML on the same backend, the attacker can delete all SAML...

CVE-2022-31122 Wire-server vulnerable to Token Recipient Confusion resulting in account impersonation, deletion or malicious account creation

Wire is an encrypted communication and collaboration platform. Versions prior to 2022-07-12/Chart 4.19.0 are subject to Token Recipient Confusion. If an attacker has certain details of SAML IdP metadata, and configures their own SAML on the same backend, the attacker can delete all SAML...

CVE-2022-31122 Wire-server vulnerable to Token Recipient Confusion resulting in account impersonation, deletion or malicious account creation

Wire is an encrypted communication and collaboration platform. Versions prior to 2022-07-12/Chart 4.19.0 are subject to Token Recipient Confusion. If an attacker has certain details of SAML IdP metadata, and configures their own SAML on the same backend, the attacker can delete all SAML...

CVE-2022-31122

Wire-server vulnerability CVE-2022-31122 is a Token Recipient Confusion issue affecting versions prior to 2022-07-12/Chart 4.19.0. If an attacker obtains SAML IdP metadata details and configures their own SAML on the same backend, they can delete all SAML-authenticated accounts of a targeted team...

Buyer can receive chargeback from fees.

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Since there is no check on who the fees.recipient is in the sell order, the buyer could be the fees recipient, with some additional signature malleability to pass the signature validation, the buyer would receive fees, thus pay less for the NFT. Proof of...

Claim can only be created for a recipient once

Lines of code Vulnerability details Claim can only be created for a recipient once The function creating claims, createClaimUnchecked, has the hasNoClaim modifier, that is defined as opposite hasActiveClaim, meaning it reverts if there is an active claim for a user. It reverts if...

An admin can revoke a claim even after the end date

Lines of code Vulnerability details From the contest description it seems that the sponsor doesn't intend to allow admin to revoke a claim after it end: our vesting contract is deliberately designed to allow admin revocation in the circumstances of early employment termination before the end of...

Revoking a claim blocks a recipient from withdrawing any unclaimed but due amount.

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Whenever an admin revokes a claim and the recipient has any unclaimed but vested balance , the unclaimed part is also revoked. Take for instance a total amount of 365 tokens vested over 1 year with a release interval of 1 day. If the recipient at day 30...