Lucene search
+L

667 matches found

Code423n4
Code423n4
•added 2022/08/07 12:00 a.m.•20 views

Manager is able to charge an excessive fee by taking out a larger than necessary flash loan

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The manager's fee is determined by the flash loan amount he takes out. A manager can take out a large flash loan to increase the fee due to him. Proof of Concept Manager needs to rebalance a vault. Manager only needs 50k flash loan. Manager takes out 2m...

6.8AI score
SaveExploits0
Code423n4
Code423n4
•added 2022/08/06 12:00 a.m.•20 views

Lent principal includes lender fee

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact A community owner is able to lend funds to a project by calling the function Community.lendToProject. Lending requires the lender to pay a lenderFee, a percentage of the fee a lender has to pay to the HomeFi system. However, the current implementation...

6.8AI score
SaveExploits0
NVD
NVD
•added 2022/08/05 12:15 p.m.•20 views

CVE-2022-2674

A vulnerability was found in SourceCodester Best Fee Management System. It has been rated as critical. Affected by this issue is the function login of the file adminclass.php. The manipulation of the argument username leads to sql injection. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has be...

9.8CVSS0.00653EPSS
SaveExploits0References1
Prion
Prion
•added 2022/08/05 12:15 p.m.•28 views

Sql injection

A vulnerability was found in SourceCodester Best Fee Management System. It has been rated as critical. Affected by this issue is the function login of the file adminclass.php. The manipulation of the argument username leads to sql injection. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has be...

7.5CVSS9.6AI score0.00653EPSS
SaveExploits0References1
Cvelist
Cvelist
•added 2022/08/05 11:40 a.m.•35 views

CVE-2022-2674 SourceCodester Best Fee Management System admin_class.php login sql injection

A vulnerability was found in SourceCodester Best Fee Management System. It has been rated as critical. Affected by this issue is the function login of the file adminclass.php. The manipulation of the argument username leads to sql injection. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has be...

7.3CVSS9.9AI score0.00653EPSS
SaveExploits0References1
CVE
CVE
•added 2022/08/05 11:40 a.m.•77 views

CVE-2022-2674

CVE-2022-2674 affects SourceCodester Best Fee Management System: the login function in admin_class.php is vulnerable to SQL injection via the username parameter. This can be exploited remotely, with public exploit availability noted. Impact is described as critical in the CVE entry. No remediatio...

9.8CVSS8.8AI score0.00653EPSS
SaveExploits0References1Affected Software1
Vulnrichment
Vulnrichment
•added 2022/08/05 11:40 a.m.•13 views

CVE-2022-2674 SourceCodester Best Fee Management System admin_class.php login sql injection

A vulnerability was found in SourceCodester Best Fee Management System. It has been rated as critical. Affected by this issue is the function login of the file adminclass.php. The manipulation of the argument username leads to sql injection. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has be...

7.3CVSS7.3AI score0.00653EPSS
SaveExploits0References1
CNNVD
CNNVD
•added 2022/08/05 12:00 a.m.•18 views

Best Fee Management System SQL注入漏洞

Best Fee Management System is a fee management system by Mayuri K. Individual developer. SourceCodester Best Fee Management System suffers from a SQL injection vulnerability that originates in its adminclass.php component, where the operation of the login function on the parameter username result...

9.8CVSS8.5AI score0.00653EPSS
SaveExploits0References2
Rapid7 Vulnerability Database (full)
Rapid7 Vulnerability Database (full)
•added 2022/08/05 12:00 a.m.•4 views

CVE-2022-2674: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command

A vulnerability was found in SourceCodester Best Fee Management System. It has been rated as critical. Affected by this issue is the function login of the file adminclass.php. The manipulation of the argument username leads to sql injection. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has be...

9.8CVSS8AI score0.00653EPSS
SaveExploits0References2
Code423n4
Code423n4
•added 2022/08/01 12:00 a.m.•19 views

Wrong arithmetic operation upon filling a bid order, lead to lost amount of ether on user funds

Lines of code Vulnerability details Functions GolomTrader.solfillBid... and GolomTrader.solfillCriteriaBid... used to fill a signed order Golom order.orderType = 1 or = 2 by the buyer after he approved GolomTrader contract some wETH. However, in case that the signed order is of type ERC1155 where...

6.7AI score
SaveExploits0
Code423n4
Code423n4
•added 2022/08/01 12:00 a.m.•11 views

Miscalculated payout to NFT sellers completing ERC1155 bids

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Payout to user fulfilling bid orders by selling their NFTs on ERC1155 will get incorrectly calculated. This will lead to eth getting stuck in the contract, and users not getting their advertised payout. Proof of Concept This whole bug takes place in...

6.9AI score
SaveExploits0
Code423n4
Code423n4
•added 2022/07/28 12:00 a.m.•17 views

Upgraded Q -> M from 268 [1659038665057]

Judge has assessed an item in Issue 268 as Medium risk. The relevant finding follows: The protocol does not support fee on transfer and other weird tokens, e.g.: IERC20rewardToken.safeTransferFrommsg.sender, addressthis, amount; rewardTokenInforewardToken.queuedRewards += amount; --- The text was...

7AI score
SaveExploits0
Code423n4
Code423n4
•added 2022/07/17 12:00 a.m.•23 views

Auctioneer Cut calculated in different order of magnitude

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Auctioneer fee is calculated in different order of magnitude. Proof of Concept As your are defining auctioneerReward in 1e18 basis point being 1e18 100% you need to divide by 1e18 when calculating percentage. function setAuctioneerRewarduint128...

6.8AI score
SaveExploits0
Code423n4
Code423n4
•added 2022/07/15 12:00 a.m.•18 views

Accidentally cancel order

Lines of code Vulnerability details Accidentally cancel order Impact Some market maker's limit order might be accidentally cancelled, and has to be resubmitted again. If the user did not do this on purpose, without knowing the fact that the order has been cancelled, it may lead to unexpected...

6.8AI score
SaveExploits0
Code423n4
Code423n4
•added 2022/07/11 12:00 a.m.•19 views

Upgraded Q -> M from 270 [1657580270573]

Judge has assessed an item in Issue 270 as Medium risk. The relevant finding follows: 6.L- Admin config ProtocolFee and gasFee missing max amount check which can be used to take fund from user With PROTOCOLFEEBPS 10000 more than 100%, the exchange can steal user WETH who might approve max WETH...

7.1AI score
SaveExploits0
Code423n4
Code423n4
•added 2022/07/04 12:00 a.m.•14 views

The fee is not paid as intended for put orders

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact MEDIUM - functions of the protocol could be impacted For put options, the fees are not paid as intended. Proof of Concept poc0: fee on non-exercised put option poc0 shows that fee is applied for put option, even though the option was not exercised. poc1:...

6.8AI score
SaveExploits0
Code423n4
Code423n4
•added 2022/07/04 12:00 a.m.•19 views

fee proportional to strike even for unexercised orders

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The protocol takes a fee proportional to the order's strike. This happens during a withdraw: // transfer strike to owner if put is expired or call is exercised if order.isCall && isExercised || !order.isCall && !isExercised // send the fee to the admin/D...

6.7AI score
SaveExploits0
Code423n4
Code423n4
•added 2022/07/04 12:00 a.m.•16 views

Short position owner will loose funds when put option expired

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Fees are expected to be paid whenever an option is exercised as per the function comment on L235. However, the current protocol implementation also charges fees for expired put options. The owner of a short put option is subject to paying fees whenever t...

6.8AI score
SaveExploits0
Code423n4
Code423n4
•added 2022/07/04 12:00 a.m.•17 views

Fee is being deducted when Put is expired and not when it is exercised.

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Fee is being deducted when Put is expired and not when it is exercised in PuttyV2.sol. Comment section of the setFee function mentions "fee rate that is applied on exercise" which signifies that the fee amount is meant to be deducted from strike only whe...

6.7AI score
SaveExploits0
Code423n4
Code423n4
•added 2022/06/26 12:00 a.m.•13 views

Potential interests are not distributed fairly among the zcTokens holders, nor taken as a protocol fee, but will be frozen in the redeemer contract

Lines of code Vulnerability details function authRedeem address u, uint256 m, address f, address t, uint256 a public authorizedIMarketPlacemarketPlace.marketsu, m, 0 returns bool // Get the principal token for the given market IERC5095 pt = IERC5095IMarketPlacemarketPlace.marketsu, m, 0; // Make...

6.7AI score
SaveExploits0
Rows per page
Query Builder