Cross site scripting

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation 'Cross-site Scripting' vulnerability in PI Websolution Conditional cart fee plugin = 1.0.96 versions...

CVE-2023-29093

CVE-2023-29093 is a Cross-Site Scripting vulnerability in the PI Websolution Conditional cart fee plugin for WordPress, affecting versions 1.0.96, specifically to 1.0.97, which addresses the XSS risk. Exploitation status is not detailed in the provided documents. Actionable takeaway: update the ...

CVE-2023-29093 WordPress Conditional extra fees for woocommerce Plugin <= 1.0.96 is vulnerable to Cross Site Scripting (XSS)

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation 'Cross-site Scripting' vulnerability in PI Websolution Conditional cart fee plugin = 1.0.96 versions...

WordPress Plugin PI Websolution Conditional cart fee 跨站脚本漏洞

WordPress and WordPress plugin are both products of the WordPress Foundation.WordPress is a blogging platform developed using the PHP language. The platform supports personal blog sites on PHP and MySQL servers.WordPress plugin is an application plugin. A cross-site scripting vulnerability exists...

Beware: 1,000+ Fake Cryptocurrency Sites Trap Users in Bogus Rewards Scheme

A previously undetected cryptocurrency scam has leveraged a constellation of over 1,000 fraudulent websites to ensnare users into a bogus rewards scheme since at least January 2021. "This massive campaign has likely resulted in thousands of people being scammed worldwide," Trend Micro researchers...

Treasury fee is not collected in withdrawEthWithInterest()

Lines of code Vulnerability details Treasury fee is not collected in withdrawEthWithInterest The withdrawEthWithInterest function fails to collect treasury fees from the lender interests. Impact The Particle exchange collects treasury fees from the lender's interests. These interests are...

Monero: Dynamic fee algorithm doesn't check for zero fee

The dynamic fee algorithm in the Monero blockchain did not properly check for a zero fee, which could have allowed an attacker to flood the network with transactions at no cost, potentially leading to unlimited blockchain growth...

Upgraded Q -> 2 from #198 [1683053528122]

Judge has assessed an item in Issue 198 as 2 risk. The relevant finding follows: L1 - The pool takes more royalty fee than it spends --- The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: All reactions...

Upgraded Q -> 2 from #680 [1683016840166]

Judge has assessed an item in Issue 680 as 2 risk. The relevant finding follows: A. Fee structure is inconsistent for buys/changes. In buy and sell function protocolFee is based on a percentage of the input/output amount but in change the fee is based on the pool fee not the input amount. It shou...

Upgraded Q -> 2 from #463 [1682585731493]

Judge has assessed an item in Issue 463 as 2 risk. The relevant finding follows: L-08 Swapping in Reth.sol may be sub-optimal The Reth pool uses the Weth/Reth 0.05% fee pool to swap between weth and reth. I recommend using the balancer pool to swap instead as it has 80M liquidity compared to...

PrivatePool.change does not work with token with less than 4 decimals

Lines of code Vulnerability details PrivatePool.change does a call to changeFeeQuote to calculate the fee amount. It computes an exponent as ERC20baseToken.decimals - 4 File: src/PrivatePool.sol 731: function changeFeeQuoteuint256 inputAmount public view returns uint256 feeAmount, uint256...

CHANGEFEE IS NOT CORRECTLY SCALED IN FLASHLOAN()

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact changeFee that has been scaled with 4 decimals of of basis points is being adopted by flashloan. This could make the function behave in an unexpected manner than intended. Proof of Concept The fee is calculated as: PrivatePool.solL632 uint256 fee =...

Tokens with Fee on Transfer can break the PrivatePool invariant

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Some tokens take a transfer fee e.g. STA, PAXG, some do not currently charge a fee but may do so in the future e.g. USDT, USDC. Fees lead to the fact that the pool actually receives less funds than expected in the contract, and the reserve configuration ...

Users wouldn't refund from the lost ETH crowdfunds due to the lack of ETH

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact After the ETH crowdfunds are lost, contributors wouldn't refund their funds because the crowdfunds contract doesn't have enough ETH balance. Proof of Concept The core flaw is calculateRefundAmount might return more refund amount than the original...

ETHCrowdfundBase.sol: all funds are lost when fee recipient cannot receive ETH

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact In the ETHCrowdfundBase contract a fundingSplitRecipient address is configured which receives a percentage of the funds in case the crowdfund is won. Neither the fundingSplitRecipient address nor the fundingSplitBps percentage can be changed. The issue i...

Upgraded Q -> 2 from #44 [1680620528235]

Judge has assessed an item in Issue 44 as 2 risk. The relevant finding follows: Low 1 RescueTokens doesn't have checks for fee0 & fee1 tokens. Admin might accidentally withdraw fee tokens that are supposed to be for the stakers: --- The text was updated successfully, but these errors were...

MuteAmplifier.rescueTokens() should check conditions for fee tokens(token0/token1) as well

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact rescueTokens can be used to withdraw fee tokens without any validations. As a result, the reward logic would be broken due to the lack of fee tokens. Proof of Concept rescueTokens doesn't validate anything for the fee tokens. So if some fee tokens were...

Malicious user can force victims to waste a lot of gas when they redeem their dMute

Lines of code Vulnerability details Proof of Concept When redeeming, the user must iterate through all the elements of userLock to destroy any redeemed locks. foruint256 i = userLocksmsg.sender.length; i 0; i-- UserLockInfo memory lockinfo = userLocksmsg.senderi - 1; // recently redeemed lock,...

MuteAmplifier.sol: rescueTokens function does not prevent fee tokens from being transferred

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The MuteAmplifier.rescueTokens function allows the owner to withdraw tokens that are not meant to be in this contract. The contract does protect tokens that ARE meant to be in the contract by not allowing them to be transferred: Link function...

WstEth slippage and fee stealing

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The WstEth derivative contract calculates the maximum slippage for buying WstEth from curve pool by using the current price in the pool at runtime, without considering the price at which the user submitted the transaction to the mempool: uint256 minOut =...