EnterToken Integer Overflow Vulnerability

EnterToken is a tradable Ether ERC20 token. An integer overflow vulnerability exists in the sell function of EnterToken's smart contract implementation where "amount sellPrice" can be zero. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to reduce the seller's assets...

MODI Token Integer Overflow Vulnerability

MODI Token MODI is a tradable Ether ERC20 token. An integer overflow vulnerability exists in the mintToken function of MODI Token's smart contract implementation. The vulnerability can be exploited by the contract owner to set the balance of any user to any value...

Reimburse Token Integer Overflow Vulnerability

Reimburse Token REIM is a tradable Ether ERC20 token. An integer overflow vulnerability exists in the mintToken function of Reimburse Token's smart contract implementation. The vulnerability can be exploited by the contract owner to set the balance of any user to any value...

CVE-2018-13041

The mint function of a smart contract implementation for Link Platform LNK, an Ethereum ERC20 token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value...

CVE-2018-13041

The mint function of a smart contract implementation for Link Platform LNK, an Ethereum ERC20 token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value...

CVE-2018-13041

The CVE-2018-13041 entry concerns Link Platform (LNK), an Ethereum ERC20 token. The vulnerability is an integer overflow in the mint function of the Link Platform smart contract, which can allow the contract owner to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value. This is documented in multipl...

Buffer overflow

The sell function of a smart contract implementation for SEC, a tradable Ethereum ERC20 token, allows a potential trap that could be used to cause financial damage to the seller, because of overflow of the multiplication of its argument amount and a manipulable variable sellPrice, aka the...

Design/Logic Flaw

The sell function of a smart contract implementation for Target Coin TGT, a tradable Ethereum ERC20 token, allows a potential trap that could be used to cause financial damage to the seller, because of overflow of the multiplication of its argument amount and a manipulable variable sellPrice, aka...

CVE-2018-12067

The sell function of a smart contract implementation for Substratum SUB, a tradable Ethereum ERC20 token, allows a potential trap that could be used to cause financial damage to the seller, because of overflow of the multiplication of its argument amount and a manipulable variable sellPrice, aka...

CVE-2018-12079

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for Substratum SUB, a tradable Ethereum ERC20 token, has no period constraint, which allows the owner to increase the total supply of the digital assets arbitrarily so as to make profits, aka the "tradeTrap" issue...

Buffer overflow

The sell function of a smart contract implementation for Substratum SUB, a tradable Ethereum ERC20 token, allows a potential trap that could be used to cause financial damage to the seller, because of overflow of the multiplication of its argument amount and a manipulable variable sellPrice, aka...

Buffer overflow

The sell function of a smart contract implementation for Internet Node Token INT, a tradable Ethereum ERC20 token, allows a potential trap that could be used to cause financial damage to the seller, because of overflow of the multiplication of its argument amount and a manipulable variable...

Buffer overflow

The buy function of a smart contract implementation for Gold Reward GRX, an Ethereum ERC20 token, allows a potential trap that could be used to cause financial damage to the buyer because of overflow of the multiplication of its argument amount and a manipulable variable buyPrice, aka the...

CVE-2018-12081

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for Target Coin TGT, a tradable Ethereum ERC20 token, has no period constraint, which allows the owner to increase the total supply of the digital assets arbitrarily so as to make profits, aka the "tradeTrap" issue...

CVE-2018-12062

The sell function of a smart contract implementation for SwftCoin SWFTC, a tradable Ethereum ERC20 token, allows a potential trap that could be used to cause financial damage to the seller, because of overflow of the multiplication of its argument amount and a manipulable variable sellPrice, aka...

CVE-2018-12083

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for GOAL Bonanza GOAL, a tradable Ethereum ERC20 token, has no period constraint, which allows the owner to increase the total supply of the digital assets arbitrarily so as to make profits, aka the "tradeTrap" issue...

CVE-2018-11446

The buy function of a smart contract implementation for Gold Reward GRX, an Ethereum ERC20 token, allows a potential trap that could be used to cause financial damage to the buyer because of overflow of the multiplication of its argument amount and a manipulable variable buyPrice, aka the...

Code injection

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for Substratum SUB, a tradable Ethereum ERC20 token, has no period constraint, which allows the owner to increase the total supply of the digital assets arbitrarily so as to make profits, aka the "tradeTrap" issue...

Code injection

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for Internet Node Token INT, a tradable Ethereum ERC20 token, has no period constraint, which allows the owner to increase the total supply of the digital assets arbitrarily so as to make profits, aka the "tradeTrap" issue...

Design/Logic Flaw

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for BitAsean BAS, a tradable Ethereum ERC20 token, has no period constraint, which allows the owner to increase the total supply of the digital assets arbitrarily so as to make profits, aka the "tradeTrap" issue...