CVE-2018-12062

The sell function of a smart contract implementation for SwftCoin SWFTC, a tradable Ethereum ERC20 token, allows a potential trap that could be used to cause financial damage to the seller, because of overflow of the multiplication of its argument amount and a manipulable variable sellPrice, aka...

CVE-2018-12070

The sell function of a smart contract implementation for SEC, a tradable Ethereum ERC20 token, allows a potential trap that could be used to cause financial damage to the seller, because of overflow of the multiplication of its argument amount and a manipulable variable sellPrice, aka the...

CVE-2018-12078

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for PolyAI AI, a tradable Ethereum ERC20 token, has no period constraint, which allows the owner to increase the total supply of the digital assets arbitrarily so as to make profits, aka the "tradeTrap" issue...

CVE-2018-12083

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for GOAL Bonanza GOAL, a tradable Ethereum ERC20 token, has no period constraint, which allows the owner to increase the total supply of the digital assets arbitrarily so as to make profits, aka the "tradeTrap" issue...

CVE-2018-12067

The sell function of a smart contract implementation for Substratum SUB, a tradable Ethereum ERC20 token, allows a potential trap that could be used to cause financial damage to the seller, because of overflow of the multiplication of its argument amount and a manipulable variable sellPrice, aka...

CVE-2018-12068

The sell function of a smart contract implementation for Target Coin TGT, a tradable Ethereum ERC20 token, allows a potential trap that could be used to cause financial damage to the seller, because of overflow of the multiplication of its argument amount and a manipulable variable sellPrice, aka...

CVE-2018-12079

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for Substratum SUB, a tradable Ethereum ERC20 token, has no period constraint, which allows the owner to increase the total supply of the digital assets arbitrarily so as to make profits, aka the "tradeTrap" issue...

CVE-2018-12081

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for Target Coin TGT, a tradable Ethereum ERC20 token, has no period constraint, which allows the owner to increase the total supply of the digital assets arbitrarily so as to make profits, aka the "tradeTrap" issue...

CVE-2018-12082

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for Fujinto NTO, a tradable Ethereum ERC20 token, has no period constraint, which allows the owner to increase the total supply of the digital assets arbitrarily so as to make profits, aka the "tradeTrap" issue...

CVE-2018-12082

The CVE-2018-12082 entry concerns Fujinto (NTO) ERC20 token smart contract where the mintToken function has no period constraint. This allows the owner to arbitrarily increase total supply, enabling profit by altering supply. Connected sources corroborate the same description across NVD/CNVD/PRIO...

CVE-2018-12067

The sell function of a smart contract implementation for Substratum SUB, a tradable Ethereum ERC20 token, allows a potential trap that could be used to cause financial damage to the seller, because of overflow of the multiplication of its argument amount and a manipulable variable sellPrice, aka...

CVE-2018-12078

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for PolyAI AI, a tradable Ethereum ERC20 token, has no period constraint, which allows the owner to increase the total supply of the digital assets arbitrarily so as to make profits, aka the "tradeTrap" issue...

CVE-2018-12079

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for Substratum SUB, a tradable Ethereum ERC20 token, has no period constraint, which allows the owner to increase the total supply of the digital assets arbitrarily so as to make profits, aka the "tradeTrap" issue...

CVE-2018-12080

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for Internet Node Token INT, a tradable Ethereum ERC20 token, has no period constraint, which allows the owner to increase the total supply of the digital assets arbitrarily so as to make profits, aka the "tradeTrap" issue...

CVE-2018-12082

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for Fujinto NTO, a tradable Ethereum ERC20 token, has no period constraint, which allows the owner to increase the total supply of the digital assets arbitrarily so as to make profits, aka the "tradeTrap" issue...

CVE-2018-12084

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for BitAsean BAS, a tradable Ethereum ERC20 token, has no period constraint, which allows the owner to increase the total supply of the digital assets arbitrarily so as to make profits, aka the "tradeTrap" issue...

CVE-2018-11446

The buy function of a smart contract implementation for Gold Reward GRX, an Ethereum ERC20 token, allows a potential trap that could be used to cause financial damage to the buyer because of overflow of the multiplication of its argument amount and a manipulable variable buyPrice, aka the...

CVE-2018-12062

SwftCoin (SWFTC), an ERC20 token, has a tradeTrap vulnerability in its sell function. The root cause is a multiplication overflow involving the argument amount and a manipulable sellPrice, enabling an attacker to cause financial damage to the seller. The issue is documented across multiple source...

CVE-2018-12067

Summary: CVE-2018-12067 affects Substratum (SUB), an Ethereum ERC20 token. Multiple sources describe a vulnerability in the tradeTrap mechanism: the sell function can overflow due to the multiplication of the input amount and a manipulable variable sellPrice, enabling a potential financial loss t...

CVE-2018-12068

The CVE-2018-12068 issue concerns a math overflow in the sell() function of the Target Coin (TGT) ERC20 contract. The vulnerability arises from overflow in multiplying the argument amount by a manipulable sellPrice, enabling a potential trap (tradeTrap) that could cause financial damage to the se...