CVE-2018-12511

In the mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for Substratum SUB, an Ethereum ERC20 token, the administrator can control mintedAmount, leverage an integer overflow, and modify a user account's balance arbitrarily...

CVE-2018-12511

In the mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for Substratum SUB, an Ethereum ERC20 token, the administrator can control mintedAmount, leverage an integer overflow, and modify a user account's balance arbitrarily...

CVE-2018-12511

The CVE-2018-12511 entry concerns Substratum (SUB) ERC-20 smart contracts. The vulnerability is in the mintToken function, where an administrator can control mintedAmount, exploit an integer overflow, and arbitrarily modify a user’s balance. This implies a privileged deniation of minting and pote...

CVE-2018-17111

The onlyOwner modifier of a smart contract implementation for Coinlancer CL, an Ethereum ERC20 token, has a potential access control vulnerability. All contract users can access functions that use this onlyOwner modifier, because the comparison between msg.sender and owner is incorrect...

CVE-2018-17111

The CVE-2018-17111 entry concerns Coinlancer (CL) Ethereum ERC20 contract where the onlyOwner modifier has an incorrect comparison between msg.sender and owner, making functions protected by onlyOwner accessible to all contract users. Documents consistently cite this as an access-control vulnerab...

Integer overflow

An integer overflow in the distributeBTR function of a smart contract implementation for Bitcoin Red BTCR, an Ethereum ERC20 token, allows the owner to accomplish an unauthorized increase of digital assets by providing a large address array, as exploited in the wild in May 2018, aka the...

CVE-2018-11687

An integer overflow in the distributeBTR function of a smart contract implementation for Bitcoin Red BTCR, an Ethereum ERC20 token, allows the owner to accomplish an unauthorized increase of digital assets by providing a large address array, as exploited in the wild in May 2018, aka the...

CVE-2018-11687

CVE-2018-11687 concerns Bitcoin Red (BTCR) ERC20 smart contracts. The issue is an integer overflow in the contract’s distributeBTR function, enabling the owner to unethically increase their balance by deploying a large address[] array. Descriptions in multiple sources confirm the vulnerability in...

CVE-2018-11687

An integer overflow in the distributeBTR function of a smart contract implementation for Bitcoin Red BTCR, an Ethereum ERC20 token, allows the owner to accomplish an unauthorized increase of digital assets by providing a large address array, as exploited in the wild in May 2018, aka the...

Code injection

The transferProxy and approveProxy functions of a smart contract implementation for SmartMesh SMT, an Ethereum ERC20 token, allow attackers to accomplish an unauthorized transfer of digital assets because replay attacks can occur with the same-named functions with the same signatures in other...

CVE-2018-10769

The transferProxy and approveProxy functions of a smart contract implementation for SmartMesh SMT, an Ethereum ERC20 token, allow attackers to accomplish an unauthorized transfer of digital assets because replay attacks can occur with the same-named functions with the same signatures in other...

CVE-2018-10769

The transferProxy and approveProxy functions of a smart contract implementation for SmartMesh SMT, an Ethereum ERC20 token, allow attackers to accomplish an unauthorized transfer of digital assets because replay attacks can occur with the same-named functions with the same signatures in other...

CVE-2018-10769

Summary (CVE-2018-10769): The SmartMesh (SMT) smart contract’s transferProxy and approveProxy functions are vulnerable to replay attacks, allowing unauthorized transfers of digital assets. The issue arises because the same-named functions (with identical signatures) exist in other tokens (First, ...

CVE-2018-11561

An integer overflow in the unprotected distributeToken function of a smart contract implementation for EETHER EETHER, an Ethereum ERC20 token, will lead to an unauthorized increase of an attacker's digital assets...

Integer overflow

An integer overflow in the unprotected distributeToken function of a smart contract implementation for EETHER EETHER, an Ethereum ERC20 token, will lead to an unauthorized increase of an attacker's digital assets...

CVE-2018-11561

An integer overflow in the unprotected distributeToken function of a smart contract implementation for EETHER EETHER, an Ethereum ERC20 token, will lead to an unauthorized increase of an attacker's digital assets...

CVE-2018-11561

CVE-2018-11561 affects the EETHER ERC20 smart contract; an integer overflow in the unprotected distributeToken function enables an attacker to illegitimately increase their digital assets. The vulnerability is described in multiple sources (NVD/CNVD) as a token-amount overflow in the distributeTo...

Tracto ERC20 Integer Overflow Vulnerability

Exploit for multiple platform in category dos / poc Hello,I found an integer overflow in increaseApproval function.And it doesn't use the safe function to add value. code addresss: https://etherscan.io/address/0x30ceCB5461A449A90081F5a5F55db4e048397BAB vuln code: function increaseApproval address...

CVE-2018-12959

The approveAndCall function of a smart contract implementation for Aditus ADI, an Ethereum ERC20 token, allows attackers to steal assets e.g., transfer all contract balances into their account...

Code injection

The approveAndCall function of a smart contract implementation for Aditus ADI, an Ethereum ERC20 token, allows attackers to steal assets e.g., transfer all contract balances into their account...