6121 matches found
CVE-2018-13664
CVE-2018-13664 affects the CWS Ethereum token contract; the mintToken function contains an integer overflow that lets the contract owner set any user’s balance to an arbitrary value. Root cause: integer overflow in mintToken. Impact: owner could manipulate balances, potentially eroding trust in t...
CVE-2018-13665
The CVE-2018-13665 entry concerns BCaaS, an Ethereum token, where the mintedToken function of its smart contract contains an integer overflow. This root cause allows the contract owner to arbitrarily set any user’s token balance. The available connected documents confirm the vulnerability in the ...
CVE-2018-13666
CVE-2018-13666 affects the EristicaICO Ethereum token. The mintToken function in its smart contract has an integer overflow that allows the contract owner to set an arbitrary user’s balance to any value. This is the stated vulnerability and impact in the CVE description from NVD. Exploit status a...
CVE-2018-13668
The CVE concerns the mintToken function of a BTPCoin Ethereum token smart contract, where an integer overflow allows the contract owner to set any user’s balance to an arbitrary value. Root cause: integer overflow in mintToken. Impact is described as enabling balance manipulation by the owner, wi...
CVE-2018-13672
CVE-2018-13672 affects the OBTCoin Ethereum token contract. The mintToken function contains an integer overflow that allows the contract owner to set any user’s balance to an arbitrary value. This could enable owner-level manipulation of token balances, potentially undermining token integrity and...
CVE-2018-13674
CVE-2018-13674 affects the ComBillAdvancedToken Ethereum token. The mintToken function contains an integer overflow that enables the contract owner to set any user’s balance to an arbitrary value. This is the underlying root cause and directly enables balance manipulation by the owner. The provid...
CVE-2018-13675
The CVE-2018-13675 issue affects the YAMBYO Ethereum token smart contract. The mintToken function contains an integer overflow vulnerability that enables the contract owner to arbitrarily set any user’s balance, constituting a seriousness in integrity impact as described in multiple sources. The ...
CVE-2018-13682
The CVE-2018-13682 entry concerns a vulnerability in the mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for ViteMoneyCoin (an Ethereum token). The issue is an integer overflow that allows the contract owner to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value. This is the concrete technica...
CVE-2018-13683
CVE-2018-13683 concerns a vulnerability in the mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for exsulcoin (Ethereum token). The issue is an integer overflow that allows the contract owner to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value. This is the explicit capability described in m...
CVE-2018-13686
CVE-2018-13686 concerns the mintToken function of the ICOD Ethereum token smart contract. The root cause is an integer overflow in mintToken that allows the contract owner to set the balance of an arbitrary address to any value, effectively compromising balances. The affected component is the min...
CVE-2018-13688
The CVE-2018-13688 entry pertains to a vulnerability in the MallToken Ethereum token where the mintToken function contains an integer overflow. This overflow enables the contract owner to set the balance of any arbitrary user to an attacker-controlled value, constituting a serious integrity impac...
CVE-2018-13689
CVE-2018-13689 affects the CJXToken Ethereum smart contract. The mintToken function has an integer overflow that lets the contract owner set any user’s balance to an arbitrary value. Root cause: overflow in mintToken. Impact: potential unauthorized credit of balances; violates token integrity. Ex...
CVE-2018-13690
The CVE-2018-13690 entry concerns the mintToken function of a smart contract for Instacocoa (Ethereum token) that contains an integer overflow. This overflow enables the contract owner to set any user’s balance to an arbitrary value, representing a high-severity impact on token balances as descri...
CVE-2018-13692
The CVE-2018-13692 entry concerns MehdiTAZIToken, an Ethereum token, where the mintToken function has an integer overflow. This overflow allows the contract owner to set the balance of any arbitrary user to any value. The root cause is an overflow in mintToken; the available documents do not spec...
CVE-2018-13697
The CVE concerns RobotBTC, an Ethereum token, where the mintToken function in its smart contract has an integer overflow vulnerability. This flaw allows the contract owner to set any user’s balance to an arbitrary value, enabling potential arbitrary credit manipulation within the token system. Th...
CVE-2018-13699
The CVE-2018-13699 entry concerns a vulnerability in the mintToken function of a DestiNeed (DSN) Ethereum token smart contract. The issue is described as an integer overflow that enables the contract owner to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value. Several connected records (NVD entry,...
CVE-2018-13704
The CVE-2018-13704 entry concerns a mintToken integer overflow in the eddToken Ethereum smart contract. The vulnerability allows the contract owner to arbitrarily set any user’s balance to a chosen value, indicating a critical flaw in balance management. Concrete details available in connected so...
CVE-2018-13713
CVE-2018-13713 concerns the mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for Tradesman, an Ethereum token, where an integer overflow allows the contract owner to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value. The description and linked sources confirm the vulnerability class (integer...
CVE-2018-13714
CVE-2018-13714 concerns the mintToken function in a CM Ethereum token smart contract. Affected component: the CM token’s smart contract code. Root cause: integer overflow in mintToken that allows the contract owner to set the balance of an arbitrary address. Impact: potential manipulation of toke...
CVE-2018-13716
The CVE-2018-13716 entry concerns a smart contract for sexhdsolo (Ethereum token) where the mintToken function suffers an integer overflow. The vulnerability allows the contract owner to set an arbitrary user’s balance to any value, indicating a flaw in balance accounting that can be manipulated ...