CVE-2018-13570

Summary: CVE-2018-13570 concerns the mint function of a smart contract for kkTestCoin1 (KTC1). The underlying issue is an integer overflow in the mint function, which enables the contract owner to set an arbitrary user’s balance to any value. Affected component: kkTestCoin1 token smart contract (...

CVE-2018-13572

The CVE-2018-13572 entry concerns the mintToken function of a PGM_Coin Ethereum token smart contract, where an integer overflow enables the contract owner to set any user’s balance to an arbitrary value. Root cause described as an overflow in balance handling within mintToken. Documented impact i...

CVE-2018-13574

The CVE concerns DataShieldCoin, an Ethereum token. The mintToken function in its smart contract has an integer overflow vulnerability that enables the contract owner to set any user’s balance to an arbitrary value. This underlying issue is described in the CVE entry and linked references, with t...

CVE-2018-13580

ProvidenceCasino (PVE) is affected. The mintToken function in its smart contract has an integer overflow vulnerability that allows the contract owner to set any user’s token balance to an arbitrary value. This is described across multiple sources (CNVD-2020-22843 and NVD entries) as a vulnerabili...

CVE-2018-13581

The CVE-2018-13581 issue is an integer overflow in the mintToken function of TravelCoin (TRV) smart contract. The overflow enables the contract owner to set the balance of any user to an arbitrary value, implying a control- or balance- manipulation vulnerability in the token implementation. Affec...

CVE-2018-13584

CVE-2018-13584 concerns a smart contract vulnerability in yasudem, an Ethereum token. The mintToken function contains an integer overflow that lets the contract owner set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value. The description and connected records confirm the affected component is the min...

CVE-2018-13586

CVE-2018-13586 affects Nectar (NCTR) token: the mintToken function in the smart contract has an integer overflow that allows the contract owner to set any user’s balance to an arbitrary value. This is documented in NVD/Nectar CVE entries. Exploitation status and concrete remediation steps are not...

CVE-2018-13588

CVE-2018-13588 concerns Code47 (C47), a Code47 Ethereum token smart contract. The mintToken function is reported to suffer an integer overflow that enables the contract owner to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value. The concrete impact described is balance manipulation by the owner, ...

CVE-2018-13591

CVE-2018-13591 concerns the mintToken function in a KAPcoin Ethereum smart contract. The root cause is an integer overflow in mintToken that lets the contract owner set any user’s balance to an arbitrary value. Affected component: the KAPcoin token contract; impact: owner-controlled balance manip...

CVE-2018-13597

The CVE-2018-13597 entry concerns a Vulnerability in a smart contract's mintToken function for a testcoin Ethereum token. The issue is an integer overflow that enables the contract owner to set an arbitrary user’s balance to any value, representing a critical control of token balances. The availa...

CVE-2018-13598

CVE-2018-13598 affects the SendMe Ethereum token smart contract. The mintToken function contains an integer overflow that allows the contract owner to set any user’s balance to an arbitrary value. This is the stated vulnerability and impact in the CVE description, with no publicly provided exploi...

CVE-2018-13600

The CVE pertains to AMToken’s mintToken function, where an integer overflow enables the contract owner to set any user’s balance to an arbitrary value. This is the documented root cause and impact. The accompanying sources describe the vulnerability but do not provide explicit exploitation detail...

CVE-2018-13604

CVE-2018-13604 concerns a mintToken function in a smart contract for the wellieat Ethereum token. The vulnerability is described as an integer overflow that enables the contract owner to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value. The primary sources (NVD entry and related records) confirm...

CVE-2018-13605

The CVE-2018-13605 entry concerns the mintToken function in Extreme Token (Extreme Coin) Ethereum contract (ExtremeToken). The root cause is an integer overflow that enables the contract owner to arbitrarily set any user’s balance to a chosen value. Documents consistently describe this vulnerabil...

CVE-2018-13608

The CVE pertains to a smart contract for archercoin (Ethereum token). The mintToken function contains an integer overflow that enables the contract owner to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value. This is the core issue described in multiple sources (NVD/NVD details, PRION, CVE records...

CVE-2018-13612

CVE-2018-13612 concerns the mintToken function of Robincoin’s Ethereum smart contract. The vulnerability is an integer overflow that allows the contract owner to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value, enabling unauthorized balance manipulation by the owner. The available documents des...

CVE-2018-13613

The CVE-2018-13613 entry concerns the mintToken function of a CON0217 Ethereum token smart contract. A reported integer overflow in mintToken allows the contract owner to set an arbitrary user’s balance to any value, enabling balance manipulation. The affected software is a smart contract impleme...

CVE-2018-13622

The CVE-2018-13622 entry describes an integer overflow in the mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for ObjectToken (OBJ), an Ethereum token. The overflow allows the contract owner to set an arbitrary user’s balance to any value, enabling potential manipulation of token balances. ...

CVE-2018-13625

The CVE-2018-13625 entry concerns the mintlvlToken function of a smart contract implementation for the Krown Ethereum token, where an integer overflow is reported to allow the contract owner to set any user’s balance to an arbitrary value. Concrete details across sources (NVD and related entries)...

CVE-2018-13629

CVE-2018-13629 concerns a vulnerability in the mintToken function of a CrimsonShilling Ethereum token smart contract. The issue is an integer overflow that allows the contract owner to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value, effectively enabling balance manipulation. Documents confirm ...