6121 matches found
CVE-2018-13625
The CVE-2018-13625 entry concerns the mintlvlToken function of a smart contract implementation for the Krown Ethereum token, where an integer overflow is reported to allow the contract owner to set any user’s balance to an arbitrary value. Concrete details across sources (NVD and related entries)...
CVE-2018-13629
CVE-2018-13629 concerns a vulnerability in the mintToken function of a CrimsonShilling Ethereum token smart contract. The issue is an integer overflow that allows the contract owner to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value, effectively enabling balance manipulation. Documents confirm ...
CVE-2018-13640
CVE-2018-13640 concerns the mintToken function of a smart-contract implementation for EthereumSmart, an Ethereum token. The issue is an integer overflow that allows the contract owner to set an arbitrary user’s balance to any value. The connected documents confirm the root cause as an overflow an...
CVE-2018-13642
The vulnerability CVE-2018-13642 affects SECoin’s smart contract mintToken function, where an integer overflow enables the contract owner to set any user balance to an arbitrary value. This is a concrete root cause in the mintToken implementation leading to arbitrary balance manipulation. The ava...
CVE-2018-13643
The CVE-2018-13643 issue affects the GCRTokenERC20 Ethereum token; its mintToken function has an integer overflow that allows the contract owner to set any user’s balance to an arbitrary value. This is documented with CVSS metrics (2.0: 5.0 Medium, Network attack, no auth; 3.0: 7.5 High, Network,...
CVE-2018-13644
The CVE refers to the mintToken function in a RoyalClassicCoin Ethereum smart contract. It describes an integer overflow vulnerability that lets the contract owner set any user’s balance to an arbitrary value. Impact stated: enables balance manipulation by the owner; no explicit exploitation deta...
CVE-2018-13645
CVE-2018-13645 concerns the mintToken function in Fiocoin’s smart contract, where an integer overflow could let the contract owner set any user’s balance. The vulnerability is rooted in arithmetic handling within mintToken, enabling arbitrary balance assignment and potentially token manipulation....
CVE-2018-13646
The vulnerability is in the mintToken function of a Datiac Ethereum token smart contract, where an integer overflow enables the contract owner to set any user’s balance to an arbitrary value. The linked documents confirm the root cause (overflow in mintToken) and the impact (owner-controlled bala...
CVE-2018-13647
The CVE-2018-13647 entry concerns a vulnerability in a TrueGoldCoinToken smart contract. The affected component is the mintToken function of the token’s Ethereum implementation. The root cause is an integer overflow in mintToken, which enables the contract owner to set an arbitrary user’s balance...
CVE-2018-13650
The CVE-2018-13650 entry concerns BitmaxerToken, an Ethereum token, where the mintToken function contains an integer overflow that enables the contract owner to set an arbitrary user’s balance to any value. This is the stated vulnerability and impact in the NVD entry; no exploitation details, aff...
CVE-2018-13651
The CVE-2018-13651 entry concerns a vulnerability in the mintToken function of the MicoinNetworkToken smart contract. The root cause is an integer overflow in mintToken, which enables the contract owner to set the balance of any arbitrary user to a chosen value. This is documented across multiple...
CVE-2018-13652
CVE-2018-13652 affects TheGoDigital’s Ethereum token smart contract. The mintToken function has an integer overflow, enabling the contract owner to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value. Public disclosures from NVD summarize the vulnerability as an overflow in mintToken that grants ow...
CVE-2018-13655
CVE-2018-13655 concerns the mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for the GFC Ethereum token. The underlying issue is an integer overflow in mintToken, which allows the contract owner to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value. The available connected documents confirm t...
CVE-2018-13658
CVE-2018-13658 : The issue affects a smart contract implementation for TheGoDgital, an Ethereum token, where the minted mintToken function contains an integer overflow. This overflow enables the contract owner to arbitrarily set any user’s balance. From the provided sources, this vulnerability is...
CVE-2018-13659
The CVE-2018-13659 entry describes an integer overflow in the mintToken function of a BrianCoin smart contract (Ethereum token). The overflow enables the contract owner to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value. This is the core vulnerability: a numeric overflow in mintToken that break...
CVE-2018-13660
The CVE-2018-13660 issue affects the BillionRewardsToken Ethereum token. The vulnerability is a flaw in the contract’s mint function that allows an attacker with the contract owner role to exploit an integer overflow and set any user’s balance to an arbitrary value. This directly impacts the toke...
CVE-2018-13664
CVE-2018-13664 affects the CWS Ethereum token contract; the mintToken function contains an integer overflow that lets the contract owner set any user’s balance to an arbitrary value. Root cause: integer overflow in mintToken. Impact: owner could manipulate balances, potentially eroding trust in t...
CVE-2018-13665
The CVE-2018-13665 entry concerns BCaaS, an Ethereum token, where the mintedToken function of its smart contract contains an integer overflow. This root cause allows the contract owner to arbitrarily set any user’s token balance. The available connected documents confirm the vulnerability in the ...
CVE-2018-13666
CVE-2018-13666 affects the EristicaICO Ethereum token. The mintToken function in its smart contract has an integer overflow that allows the contract owner to set an arbitrary user’s balance to any value. This is the stated vulnerability and impact in the CVE description from NVD. Exploit status a...
CVE-2018-13668
The CVE concerns the mintToken function of a BTPCoin Ethereum token smart contract, where an integer overflow allows the contract owner to set any user’s balance to an arbitrary value. Root cause: integer overflow in mintToken. Impact is described as enabling balance manipulation by the owner, wi...