Single-step process for critical admin transfer is risky

Handle 0xRajeev Vulnerability details Impact LongShort and Staker contracts have the notion of an “admin” address that is used within onlyAdmin or adminOnly modifiers for granting authorization to critical functions. Such contracts use a single-step ownership transfer of such admin addresses usin...

Free stake by replacing input token address

Handle jonah1005 Vulnerability details Impact In PoolOpen contract, pools' authentication is done through baseData. However, it handles token transfer based on the given parameter token. By appending a real token address at the end of the transaction and a fake address in the function parameter,...

Deposits don't work with fee-on transfer tokens

Handle cmichel Vulnerability details There are ERC20 tokens that may make certain customizations to their ERC20 contracts. Some tokens charge a certain fee for every transfer or transferFrom. Others types are rebasing tokens that increase in value over time like Aave's aTokens balanceOf changes...

[Pool] - Flash loan + Synth.realise allows anyone to extract value from LPs

Handle adelamo Vulnerability details Impact On Synth.sol, we have the method realise that checks if the LP value is higher than the Synth value. If confirmed, it will burn the premium LP. Using a flash loan, we can add liquidity to the pool, mint some LP tokens. Then, call realise using the pool...

Return values of ERC20 transfer and transferFrom are unchecked

Handle shw Vulnerability details Impact In the contract RCTreasury, the return values of ERC20 transfer and transferFrom are not checked, which could be false if the transferred token is not ERC20-compliant. In that case, the transfer fails without being noticed by the calling contract. Proof of...

Card affiliate payouts are skipped if a single card does not have an affiliate

Handle cmichel Vulnerability details Vulnerability Details The Market.initialize function sets the cardAffiliateCut to zero if a single cardAffiliateAddresses is the zero address. for uint256 i = 0; i numberOfCards; i++ if cardAffiliateAddressesi == address0 cardAffiliateCut = 0; Impact Even if a...

Unbounded loop in _removeNft could lead to a griefing/DOS attack

Handle shw Vulnerability details Impact Griefing/DOS attack is possible when a malicious NFT contract sends many NFTs to the vault, which could cause excessive gas consumed and even transactions reverted when other users are trying to unlock or transfer NFTs. Proof of Concept 1. The function...

An attacker can cause an overflow in the flashLoan function

Handle janbro Vulnerability details Summary An attacker can cause an overflow in the flashLoan function where 0 tokens are burned after a large amount of tokens are minted, if there is a flash loan fee, due to not utilizing safe math. Risk Rating Critical Vulnerability Details An attacker can cra...

Unrestricted addLiquidity could cause unintended results on front-end apps that listen to events.

Handle shw Vulnerability details Impact The addLiquidity function in Pool.sol lacks an access control, which allows an attacker to add liquidity for any specific user. Front-end apps that listen to AddLiquidity events may be affected by this vulnerability and may go wrong since it is not the user...

Code different from comment

Handle s1m0 Vulnerability details Impact The formula doesn't coincide with the comment. Proof of Concept Tools Used Manual analysis. Recommended Mitigation Steps Correct the code or the comment. --- The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: All reactions...

Missing checks if pairs equal tokens

Email address [email protected] Handle @cmichelio Eth address 0x6823636c2462cfdcD8d33fE53fBCD0EdbE2752ad Vulnerability details The UniswapStyleLib.getAmountsOut, PriceAware.setLiquidationPath and others don't check that path.length + 1 == tokens.length which should always hold true. Also, it does n...

Impossible to call withdrawReward fails due to run out of gas

Handle s1m0 Vulnerability details Impact The withdrawReward fails due to the loop at . From my testing the dayDiff would be 18724 and with a gasLimit of 9500000 it stops at iteration 270 due to the fact that lastUpdatedDay is not initialized so is 0. Other than that it could run out of gas also f...

Attacker can call update_market frequently to halt the increase of secRewardsPerShare

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Attacker can call updatemarket frequently to halt the increase of secRewardsPerShare. Proof of Concept market.secRewardsPerShare += uint128blockDelta 1e18 / marketSupply; // TODO: Scaling Suppose marketSupply is 1e21, then the attacker can call...

Upgraded Q -> 3 from #146 [1706014097180]

Judge has assessed an item in Issue 146 as 3 risk. The relevant finding follows: L-6: OLAS minting via treasury is not guaranteed The OLAS.mint… method does not revert if the requested amount cannot be limited due to the inflation limit: function mintaddress account, uint256 amount external //...

[M1] LastDonationBlockNumber should be updated at the beginning of the function to prevent from reentracy attack

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The ineffectiveness of an update against a flashloans attack. Analysis of the vulnerability You update lastDonationBlockNumber after every donation. However, you update is done at the end of the function trackServiceDonations function trackServiceDonatio...

When unpausing the GuardCM, not setting governorCheckProposalId to 0 puts the assets of the protocol at risk

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact If the GuardCM was paused once, the community multisig CM can pause it again without checking for the governances activity. This moves the power within the system from the governance to the CM and can, in the worst case, result in the lose of all funds o...

[M2] DrainServicesSlashedFunds has not check for received funds

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact ​ Loss of funds. Analysis of the vulnerability The function to drain funds from Service Registry is not checking that is receiving the correct amount from ServiceRegistry. /// @dev Drains slashed funds from the service registry. /// @return amount Draine...

Overflow potential

Lines of code Vulnerability details Overflow: Be cautious about integer overflow when incrementing size. Depending on how the size variable is used in your contract, it might be beneficial to check for potential overflow conditions. requiresize typeuint256.max, "Heap size exceeds maximum"; Assess...

repay(), liquidate() and liquidateWLp() receive shares as argument, which may revert if from approval to tx settled blocks have passed

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact repay, liquidate and liquidateWLp transactions revert if users approve the exact repay amount they need in the frontend and only after some blocks have passed is the transaction settled. This happens because the interest accrual is by timestamp, so the...

_verifyVoteSignature wrong implementation

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Detailed description of the impact of this finding. voteHash = keccak256abi.encodeVOTETYPEHASH, from, pieceIds, noncesfrom++, deadline; here we are using noncesfrom++ for calculating voteHash but different from address can have the same noncesfrom++...

Users can avoid liquidation by splitting their positions into smaller ones

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Bad debt creation, as the total sum of positions could yield a signicant underwater position, but they would likely not be liquidated as it wouldn't compensate liquidators. Proof of Concept A recent, random transaction on Mantle shows a gas fee of 0.47...

Business Logic Vulnerability in dropTopVotedPiece Function

Lines of code Vulnerability details Potential Risk: The dropTopVotedPiece function in the CultureIndex contract allows the dropperAdmin to drop the top-voted piece. While the function checks if the caller is the dropperAdmin, there is a potential business logic vulnerability. The function only...

malicious borrowers can follow reclaimLiquidity() then execute addPremium() to invalidate renewalCutoffTime

Lines of code Vulnerability details Vulnerability details LP can set renewalCutoffTime=block.timestamp by executing reclaimLiquidity, to force close position function liquidatePosition DataStruct.ClosePositionParams calldata params, address borrower external override nonReentrant ... if...

Contracts are vulnerable to fee-on-transfer accounting-related issues

Lines of code 359, 448, 509, 530, 42, 797, 162 Vulnerability details The functions below transfer funds from the caller to the receiver via transferFrom, but do not ensure that the actual number of tokens received is the same as the input amount to the transfer. If the token is a fee-on-transfer...

_safeMint() should be used rather than _mint() wherever possible

Lines of code 139, 178, 204 Vulnerability details mint is discouraged in favor of safeMint which ensures that the recipient is either an EOA or implements IERC721Receiver. Both OpenZeppelin and solmate have versions of this function. In the cases below, mint does not call...

Unsafe usage of msg.value in a loop

Lines of code 140 Vulnerability details The value of msg.value in a transaction's call never gets updated, even if the called contract ends up sending some or all of the Eth to another contract. This means that using msg.value in a for- or while-loop, without extra accounting logic, will either...

Some tokens may revert when zero value transfers are made

Lines of code 356, 371, 145, 272, 252, 116, 445, 374, 506, 488https://github.com/Tapioca-DAO/tap-token-audit/blob/59749be5bc2286f0bdbf59d7ddc258ddafd49a9f/contracts/options/TapiocaOptionBroker...

testing discord integration

Lines of code L1 Vulnerability details TEST --- The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: All reactions...

Unchecked return value of low-level call()/delegatecall()

Lines of code 120, 141, 411, 184, 160, 189, 152, 444, 625, 638https://github.com/Tapioca-DAO/tapioca-bar-audit/blob/2286f80f928f41c8bc189d0657d74ba83286c668/contract...

The protocol is susceptible to reentrancy attacks.

Lines of code Vulnerability details Reentrancy is a well know bug in smart contract and the protocol is not handling it, The safeMint function in ERC721 make a callback to the receiver checking if they can hold a nft, this can be used to a receiver to take control of the execution of the call. in...

Fee on transfer tokens are not accounted for in any way

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Fee on transfer or other unique tokens are not properly accounted for. This could lead to wrong accounting within The Ocean and eventual losses for the protocol. Proof of Concept The Ocean doesn't keep track of its balances when a user is wrapping a toke...

doInteraction() won't mint tokens to user if interaction.specifiedAmount less than 10**12 and has certain conditions

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact If the user calls doInteraction and executes Interaction with specifiedAmount less than 10 12 and a big difference in token decimals, the user won't get any tokens. Proof of Concept Core external functions like doInteraction will call the internal...

Division by Zero and Precision Loss in computeOutputAmount Function

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The vulnerability can cause a runtime exception due to division by zero, leading to contract execution reverting. Additionally, precision loss may occur in calculations due to truncation of remainders, Proof of Concept When unwrapFeeDivisor unexpectedly...

Return values of approve() not checked

Lines of code 321, 215, 184, 450, 761, 217, 157, 234, 339, 386https://github.com/Tapioca-DAO/t...

asD creator's would not be able to claim interest accrued due to wrong calculations of the maximumWithdrawable

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Detailed description of the impact of this finding. The asD contract implement's withdrawCarry method, which calculates the accrued interest on the users NOTE deposit. The variable maximumWithdrawable gets interest accrued by the deposit by the...

RandomizerNXT allows randomness re-rolling and also front-running.

Lines of code Vulnerability details Description When a collection uses RandomizerNXT as the randomizer, the process of minting and setting the token hash happens in the same transaction and block, which allows two attacks. First, a user can see the randomness outcome in mempool and front-run his...

Reentrancy on batchRefund making external call

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Reentrancy can occur when the refund function being called inside the batchRefund function allows external contract calls that can trigger the batchRefund function again before the previous execution is completed. Proof of Concept The batchRefund functio...

Upgraded Q -> 2 from #320 [1699029580772]

Judge has assessed an item in Issue 320 as 2 risk. The relevant finding follows: 2. The governor setting not reliable The initial setting for the voting period in ODGovernor is 15 block, which can be too tight for the governance. Based on Arbitrum block time, which is about 0.26 seconds, which ca...

StakedUSDe.totalSupply() may decrease below MIN_SHARES by StakedUSDe.redistributeLockedAmount.

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact StakedUSDe runs checkMinShares in deposit and withdraw to keep the totalSupply more than MINSHARES, 1e18. It is to prevent an ERC4626 inflation attack. However, StakedUSDe.redistributeLockedAmountuser, address0 burns all the user's shares and decreases t...

Deploying a market with a non-ERC20 asset can cause incorrect interaction with asset

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The market contract may expect certain ERC20 functions to be present and behave in a specific way. If the asset contract does not adhere to the ERC20 standard, the market may behave unexpectedly, resulting in incorrect token balances, pricing, or other...

Lender can cause unintended behavior for the borrower's transaction

Lines of code Vulnerability details This vulnerability comes in the form of when a borrower wants to remove a lender as a both deposit and withdraw and set them as a withdraw only, to avoid paying more interest on their funds in the market, this plan may not go as planned, based on the nature of...

Uninitialized State Variables

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact in The resetTmpMarketParameters function is an internal function, which means it can only be called from within the WildcatMarketController contract itself. If a child contract inherits from WildcatMarketController and calls resetTmpMarketParameters befo...

During Safe Transfer, the Receiving User Loses Control of the Safe, Resulting in the Safe Being Lost

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Assuming a user wants to transfer their safe NFT to another user, post transfer Vault721::afterTokenTransfer is triggered. This function in turn calls the IODSafeManager::transferSAFEOwnership function to complete the transfer. The problem here is, that...

repayAllDebt joins system tokens to the proxy not to the Safe contract

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact repayAllDebt now calls joinSystemCoins with dest = addressthis, which in case a proxy makes a delegated call to this function will cause the user's tokens to be transferred to its proxy, then in CoinJoin.join it will transfer internal coins from CoinJoin...

Delegating the call from ODProxy will make the changes in the context of ODProxy's storage layer which breaks the invariant.

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Making the delegate call to ODSafeManager will affect the storage of ODProxy leaving behind the inconsistent state in ODSafeManager, moreover this issue will also breaks the invariant 'Users must exclusively use the ODProxy to interact with their safes.'...

Nonce update

Lines of code Vulnerability details return uint256keccak256abi.encodePackedownersHash, ownerSafeCountownersHash++, salt, VERSION; here ownerSafeCountownersHash++ is used as nonce for different ownerSafeCount mapping if ownersHash is 0 or 1 the mapping will be 0 for the first item.This will cause ...

Compiler version used by Brahma contracts may introduce permanent bugs in the future

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Lack of upgradeability of protocol to adapt with new pragma version may introduce a risk of being targeted by malicious actors if the pragma version 0.8.19 introduce bugs in the future. Here's the list of previous solidity compiler bugs for your referenc...

Possibility of security vulnerabilities introduced by creating ERC20ProxyDelegator instances on the fly using static salt values

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Security risks associated with deploying proxy contracts via deterministic addresses that can be easily calculated. In deployProxyDelegatorIfNeeded, in the case that extcodesizeproxyAddress == 0, then a proxy contract is instantiated ad hoc via new...

if the Virtual Account's owner is a Contract Account (multisig wallet), attackers can gain control of the Virtual Accounts by gaining control of the same owner's address in a different chain

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Attackers can gain control of User's Virtual Accounts and steal all the assets these accounts hold in the Root environment Proof of Concept When sending signed messages from a Branch to Root, the RootBridgeAgent contract calls the...

Potential Fund Compromise via Malicious Token Insertion

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Since any token can be sent to the PrimeLiquidityProvider contract there is a great chance of an attacker sending a scam token with some legit value in it to lure the owner making him sweep those tokens and by doing so compromising the whole contract's...