Votes can be cast even if the proposal state is not "Active"

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Votes can be cast on proposals that are not currently open for voting, which can lead to unexpected behavior and potential manipulation of the voting process. By allowing votes to be cast on inactive proposals, it undermines the intended functionality of...

The fork escrow voting should use the snapshot mechanism to save whether the current DAO state reaches the fork threshold

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The fork escrow vote does not use the snapshot mechanism or checkpoint mechanism to save whether the current DAO state reaches the fork threshold, which may cause the timing of the fork to be missed. Proof of Concept Suppose the following scenario: 1. Wh...

Ex-token holders are still able to cast votes on proposals under certain circumstances

Lines of code Vulnerability details When casting a vote, an address is limited to a certain amount of votes derived from ds.nouns.getPriorVotes. However, due to the nature of ds.nouns.getPriorVotes, the amount of votes available to an address solely depends on the amount of tokens they held when ...

The code uses arithmetic operations without explicitly checking for possible overflows or underflows

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The impact of the Integer Overflow/Underflow vulnerability can be summarized as follows: Data Inaccuracy: The vulnerability can lead to incorrect calculations and inaccurate data, potentially compromising the integrity of voting processes and other...

CVE-2023-2010: Concurrent Execution using Shared Resource with Improper Synchronization

The Forminator WordPress plugin before 1.24.1 does not use an atomic operation to check whether a user has already voted, and then update that information. This leads to a Race Condition that may allow a single user to vote multiple times on a poll...

proposals view function returns wrong voting results

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Detailed description of the impact of this finding. Even though, the votes are calculated correctly, the proposals view function returns wrong voting results returning forVotes results as againstVotes amount. This would negatively impact the users...

Proposal remains open to votes for only 3 blocks instead of 7 days

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact LybraGovernance contract only allows to vote during the first 3 blocks after the snapshot is taken. Assuming it takes roughly 12 seconds per 1 block on Ethereum, it is only 36 seconds to decide and vote for a proposal. This would be too fast for a regula...

Voting period hardcoded to 3 blocks

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Here in the Governance contract, the voting period is locked to 3 blocks. function votingPeriod public pure override returns uint256 return 3; function votingDelay public pure override returns uint256 return 1; This is a direct bug because if we take a...

User who stakes into StRSRVotes doesn't have any voting power

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact User who stakes into StRSRVotes doesn't have any voting power. This is not intuitive clear and user who thinks that he can vote, actually will not be able until he will delegate votes to himself. Proof of Concept StRSRVotes contract extends StRSR which h...

CVE-2022-48506

A flawed pseudorandom number generator in Dominion Voting Systems ImageCast Precinct ICP and ICP2 and ImageCast Evolution ICE scanners allows anyone to determine the order in which ballots were cast from public ballot-level data, allowing deanonymization of voted ballots, in several types of...

Code injection

A flawed pseudorandom number generator in Dominion Voting Systems ImageCast Precinct ICP and ICP2 and ImageCast Evolution ICE scanners allows anyone to determine the order in which ballots were cast from public ballot-level data, allowing deanonymization of voted ballots, in several types of...

CVE-2022-48506

CVE-2022-48506 concerns a flawed pseudorandom number generator in Dominion Voting Systems ImageCast Precinct (ICP and ICP2) and ImageCast Evolution (ICE) scanners. The vulnerability allows deanonymization of voted ballots by deducing the order of ballot casting from public ballot-level data. Affe...

CVE-2022-48506

A flawed pseudorandom number generator in Dominion Voting Systems ImageCast Precinct ICP and ICP2 and ImageCast Evolution ICE scanners allows anyone to determine the order in which ballots were cast from public ballot-level data, allowing deanonymization of voted ballots, in several types of...

PT-2023-15832 · Dominion Voting Systems · Imagecast Evolution +2

Name of the Vulnerable Software and Affected Versions: Democracy Suite versions 5.2, 5.4-NM, 5.5, 5.5-A, 5.5-B, 5.5-C, 5.5-D, 5.7-A, 5.10, 5.10A, 5.15 Description: A flawed pseudorandom number generator in Dominion Voting Systems ImageCast Precinct ICP and ICP2 and ImageCast Evolution ICE scanner...

CVE-2022-48506: Use of Cryptographically Weak Pseudo-Random Number Generator (PRNG)

A flawed pseudorandom number generator in Dominion Voting Systems ImageCast Precinct ICP and ICP2 and ImageCast Evolution ICE scanners allows anyone to determine the order in which ballots were cast from public ballot-level data, allowing deanonymization of voted ballots, in several types of...

cheqd-node subject to Cosmos SDK "Barberry" vulnerability

Impact This vulnerability dubbed "Barberry" affects the Cosmos SDK framework used by cheqd-node as base. It impacts the way Cosmos SDK handles vesting accounts, and can therefore be a high-impact vulnerability for any network running the framework. There is no vulnerability in the DID/resource...

voting-station.net Cross Site Scripting vulnerability OBB-3411813

Following the coordinated and responsible vulnerability disclosure guidelines of the ISO 29147 standard, Open Bug Bounty has: a. verified the vulnerability and confirmed its existence; b. notified the website operator about its existence. Technical details of the vulnerability are currently hidde...

Governance NFT can be burned to DoS accept()

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact accept can be DoS'd by burning governance NFTs. Authorities can effectively veto proposals. Proof of Concept The new lastBurnTimestamp reverts PartyGovernance.accept if lastBurnTimestamp == block.timestamp. lastBurnTimestamp is set in...

Fairness should be denominated in mintedVotingPower rather than totalVotingPower

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Rage quitter receives too little. Proof of Concept The rage quitter receives a share votingPowerByTokenIdtokenId 1e18 / totalVotingPower of each token balance. However the sum of votingPowerByTokenIdtokenId over all tokenId, i.e. mintedVotingPower, may b...

Burning an NFT can be used to block voting

Lines of code Vulnerability details Burning an NFT can be used to block voting Impact A new validation in the accept function has been introduced in order to mitigate a potential attack to the party governance. By burning an NFT, a party member can reduce the total voting power of the party just...