1243 matches found
ReraiseETHCrowdfund.sol: Multiple scenarios how pending votes might not be claimable which is a complete loss of funds for a user
Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact This issue is about how the ReraiseETHCrowdfund claim functionality can be broken. When the claim functionality is broken this means that a user cannot claim his voting power, resulting in a complete loss of funds. The claim functionality is not broken i...
ReraiseETHCrowdfund.sol: party card transfer can be front-run by claiming pending voting power which results in a loss of the voting power
Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact In this report I show how an attacker can abuse the fact that anyone can call ReraiseETHCrowdfund.claim for any user and add voting power to an existing party card. The result can be a griefing attack whereby the victim loses voting power. In some cases...
ETHCrowdfundBase.sol: totalVotingPower is increased too much in the _finalize function
Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact This issue is about how the ETHCrowdfundBase.finalize functions calls PartyGovernanceNFT.increaseTotalVotingPower with an amount that does not reflect the sum of the individual users' voting power. Thereby it will become impossible to reach unanimous...
PartyGovernanceNFT.sol: burn function does not reduce totalVotingPower making it impossible to reach unanimous votes
Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact With the new version of the Party protocol the PartyGovernanceNFT.burn function has been introduced. This function is used to burn party cards. According to the sponsor the initial purpose of this function was to enable the InitialETHCrowdfund contract t...
voting-station.net Cross Site Scripting vulnerability OBB-3253294
Following the coordinated and responsible vulnerability disclosure guidelines of the ISO 29147 standard, Open Bug Bounty has: a. verified the vulnerability and confirmed its existence; b. notified the website operator about its existence. Technical details of the vulnerability are currently hidde...
VetoProposal: proposals cannot be vetoed in all states in which it should be possible to veto proposals
Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The VetoProposal contract allows to veto proposals with the voteToVeto function. The proposal can only be vetoed when it is in the Voting state, otherwise the voteToVeto function reverts. The issue is that the Voting state is not the only state in which ...
CVE-2023-24403
Auth. admin+ Stored Cross-Site Scripting XSS vulnerability in WP For The Win bbPress Voting plugin = 2.1.11.0 versions...
Cross site scripting
Auth. admin+ Stored Cross-Site Scripting XSS vulnerability in WP For The Win bbPress Voting plugin = 2.1.11.0 versions...
CVE-2023-24403 WordPress bbPress Voting Plugin <= 2.1.11.0 is vulnerable to Cross-Site Scripting (XSS)
Auth. admin+ Stored Cross-Site Scripting XSS vulnerability in WP For The Win bbPress Voting plugin = 2.1.11.0 versions...
CVE-2023-24403
The CVE-2023-24403 entry describes a Stored XSS vulnerability in the WordPress bbPress Voting plugin (WP For The Win) versions
CVE-2023-24403 WordPress bbPress Voting Plugin <= 2.1.11.0 is vulnerable to Cross-Site Scripting (XSS)
Auth. admin+ Stored Cross-Site Scripting XSS vulnerability in WP For The Win bbPress Voting plugin = 2.1.11.0 versions...
WordPress Plugin bbPress Voting 跨站脚本漏洞
WordPress and WordPress plugin are both products of the WordPress Foundation.WordPress is a blogging platform developed using the PHP language. The platform supports setting up personal blog sites on servers with PHP and MySQL.WordPress plugin is an application plugin. A cross-site scripting...
createProposal snapshot block can temporarily desync with minApproval / minVotingPower
Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact minApproval and member list will be temporarily out of sync, potentially causing approval issues Proof of Concept uint64 snapshotBlock = block.number.toUint64 - 1; ... // Create the proposal Proposal storage proposal = proposalsproposalId;...
Multisig: Users can approve proposals even after getting removed
Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The Multisig contract intends to enable the creation and approval of proposals among a predetermined list of multisig addresses. The multisig addresses can be added or removed by a authorative identity. While creating a new proposal a snapshotBlock...
User may force fail the action from the DAO:execute
Lines of code Vulnerability details Description The execute function from the DAO.sol contract allow to execution of any call to any address if the caller has appropriate permission. Some calls are expected to be always successfully executed, and some may revert and execute will continue the...
Malicious member can steal funds from the DAO contract.
Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The malicious member can steal assets from DAO protocol. Proof of Concept The protocol allows the member to have the voting power to create a proposal createProposal. Where the action struct in the parameter refers to be consumed by the DAO's execute...
SUSE CVE-2018-0490
An issue was discovered in Tor before 0.2.9.15, 0.3.1.x before 0.3.1.10, and 0.3.2.x before 0.3.2.10. The directory-authority protocol-list subprotocol implementation allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service NULL pointer dereference and directory-authority crash via a misformatted rel...
WordPress bbPress Voting Plugin <= 2.1.11.0 is vulnerable to Cross Site Scripting (XSS)
Software bbPress Voting Type Plugin Vulnerable versions = 2.1.11.0 Fixed in 2.1.11.1 OWASP Top 10 A7: Cross-Site Scripting XSS Classification Cross Site Scripting XSS CVE CVE-2023-24403 Patch priority Low CVSS severity Low 5.9 Developer Claim ownership PSID 1339fe1c9dad Credits Rio Darmawan...
bbPress Voting < 2.1.11.1 - Admin+ Stored XSS
The plugin does not sanitise and escape some of its settings, which could allow high privilege users such as admin to perform Stored Cross-Site Scripting attacks even when the unfilteredhtml capability is disallowed for example in multisite setup...
BigBlueButton 安全漏洞
BigBlueButton is an open source web conferencing system from the BigBlueButton community. A security vulnerability exists in BigBlueButton versions prior to 2.4.0, which stems from exposing sensitive information to unauthorized participants, and affects voting meetings where the attacker is a...