PaprController should not pay the swap fee in buyAndReduceDebt

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The best case scenario is that the paprController doesn't have any underlying tokens, in which case, buyAndReduceDebt won't work when there is a swapFee. Otherwise, paprController ends up paying for the swapFee. Even if there isn't a swap fee, the user c...

Aruba Networks EdgeConnect 安全漏洞

Aruba Networks EdgeConnect is an edge connectivity management platform from Aruba Networks, USA. A security vulnerability exists in Aruba Networks EdgeConnect that stems from a command line interface that allows an authenticated remote user to run arbitrary commands on the underlying host...

PoolAdmin can steal NFT from NTokens

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The executeAirdrop function allow pool admin to execute arbitrary call to arbitrary contract, including a transferFrom call to the underlying NFT contract. This can be used by the pool admin to steal NFT inside the NToken contracts. Since the rescueERC72...

WPunk will become locked if liquidator ops to receive the underlying token instead of nToken

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact WPunks received directly as the result of liquidation will be unable to be withdrawn Proof of Concept function withdrawPunkuint256 calldata punkIndexes, address to external nonReentrant INToken nWPunk = INToken Pool.getReserveDataaddressWPunk.xTokenAddre...

CVE-2022-33873: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command

An improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS Command 'OS Command Injection' vulnerabilities CWE-78 in Console login components of FortiTester 2.3.0 through 3.9.1, 4.0.0 through 4.2.0, 7.0.0 through 7.1.0 may allow an unauthenticated attacker to execute arbitrary command in the...

CVE-2022-22555

Dell EMC PowerStore, contains an OS command injection Vulnerability. A locally authenticated attacker could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to the execution of arbitrary OS commands on the PowerStore underlying OS, with the privileges of the vulnerable application. Exploitation ma...

Incorrect check in ZcToken.withdraw and ZcToken.redeem leads to underlying tokens not being able to be transferred

Lines of code Vulnerability details Incorrect check in ZcToken.withdraw and ZcToken.redeem leads to underlying tokens not being able to be transferred In both ZcToken.withdraw and ZcToken.redeem, in the case where holder != msg.sender, a check of the msg.sender's ZcToken allowance is performed. B...

Loss of funds in an underlying protocol would cause catostrophic loss of funds for swivel

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Loss of all user funds Proof of Concept This exploit stems from a quirk in the way that exchange rate is tracked for matured positions. We first need to breakdown how interest is calculate for a matured position. In L124 the yield for a matured position ...

onERC721Received() could delegatecall to transder the tokens

Lines of code Vulnerability details onERC721Received could delegatecall to transder the tokens Impact Some onERC721Received could use delegatecall to drain the tokens Putty holds. Because the msg.sender is Putty contract, the tarnsfer can go through. Or taking the ownership of the Putty contract...

The stable ctoken underlying price quote could be manipulated

Lines of code...

Funds may be stuck when redeeming for Illuminate

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Funds may be stuck when redeeming for Illuminate. Proof of Concept Assuming the goal of calling redeem for Illuminate here is to redeem the Illuminate principal held by the lender or the redeemer, then there is an issue because the wrong balance is...

User to lose all the funds when lend() to Swivel

Lines of code Vulnerability details function lend uint8 p, address u, uint256 m, uint256 memory a, address y, Swivel.Order calldata o, Swivel.Components calldata s public unpausedp returns uint256 // lent represents the number of underlying tokens lent uint256 lent; // returned represents the...

Transfer the principal token from the lender contract to here but actually transfer underlying token

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Transfer the principal token from the lender contract to here but actually transfer underlying token from lender to redeemer. Proof of Concept // Transfer the principal token from the lender contract to here Safe.transferFromIERC20u, lender, addressthis,...

Illuminate PT redeeming do not return underlying to a user

Lines of code Vulnerability details In the second step of two step redeeming process, the underlying funds should be located in the Redeemer contract as external system burned the shares the Redeemer obtained from the Lender contract and returned underlying to Redeemer. Then Redeemer's Illuminate...

Transferring any amount of the underlying token to the CNote contract will make the contract functions unusable

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The contract expects the balance of the underlying token to == 0 at all points when calling the contract functions by requiring getCashPrior == 0, which checks token.balanceOfaddressthis where token is the underlying asset. An attacker can transfer any...

YearnTokenAdapter's wrap can become stuck as it uses one step approval for an arbitrary underlying

Lines of code Vulnerability details Some tokens do not allow for approval of positive amount when allowance is positive already to handle approval race condition, most known example is USDT. This can cause the function to stuck whenever a combination of such a token and leftover approval be met...

amount requires to be updated to contract balance increase (3)

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Every time transferFrom or transfer function in ERC20 standard is called there is a possibility that underlying smart contract did not transfer the exact amount entered. It is required to find out contract balance increase/decrease after the transfer. Th...

[WP-H27] IndexTemplate.sol#compensate() will most certainly fail

Handle WatchPug Vulnerability details Root Cause Precision loss while converting between the amount of shares and the amount of underlying tokens back and forth is not handled properly. uint256 shortage; if totalLiquidity amount //Insolvency case shortage = amount - value; uint256 cds =...

No slippage protection on _swapUstToUnderlying can lead to lost funds

Handle harleythedog Vulnerability details Impact The function swapUstToUnderlying exists to swap Ust to underlying tokens. The last argument to exchangeunderlying is mindy, which specifies the minimum number of underlying to be returned from the swap. Currently, this value is set to 0, so the...

Missing reentrant check can be abused by increasing total share, before transfering underlying token

Handle Fitraldys Vulnerability details Impact When interacting with the vault contract, the user can call the deposit function, however this can be used to reenter this function because the deposit function will eventually call depositors.mint and in the mint function inside depositors will call...