CVE-2023-22776

An authenticated path traversal vulnerability exists in the ArubaOS command line interface. Successful exploitation of this vulnerability results in the ability to read arbitrary files on the underlying operating system, including sensitive system files...

CVE-2023-22770

Authenticated command injection vulnerabilities exist in the ArubaOS command line interface. Successful exploitation of these vulnerabilities result in the ability to execute arbitrary commands as a privileged user on the underlying operating system...

CVE-2023-23692

Dell EMC prior to version DDOS 7.9 contains an OS command injection Vulnerability. An authenticated non admin attacker could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to the execution of arbitrary OS commands on the application's underlying OS, with the privileges of the vulnerable...

Lendgine#mint gifts the borrower liquidity and both underlying token as well which bricks contract functionality

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Borrower of liquidity can just keep borrowing liquidity as he will also get token0 and token1, draining the protocol funds. Proof of Concept Lendginemint calls Pairburn before calling mint to mint the number of ERC20 power tokens. totalLiquidityBorrowed ...

CVE-2022-45103

Dell Unisphere for PowerMax vApp, VASA Provider vApp, and Solution Enabler vApp version 9.2.3.x contain an information disclosure vulnerability. A low privileged remote attacker could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to read arbitrary files on the underlying file system...

Command injection

Multiple improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS Command 'OS Command Injection' vulnerabilities CWE-78 in FortiTester 7.1.0, 7.0 all versions, 4.0.0 through 4.2.0, 2.3.0 through 3.9.1 may allow an authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary commands in the underlying shell...

function buyAndReduceDebt() spend more underlying token than user specified and also code doesn't check that swapFeeBips is less than BIPS_ONE and user can lose some of his underlying token balance that he gave protocol spending approval

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact user can specify fee recipient and fee amount to send to that recipient and it is calculated by amount swapFeeBips / BIPSONE but there is no check in the code to make sure swapFeeBips is less than BIPSONE and if user set wrong value by mistake or client...

PaprController should not pay the swap fee in buyAndReduceDebt

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The best case scenario is that the paprController doesn't have any underlying tokens, in which case, buyAndReduceDebt won't work when there is a swapFee. Otherwise, paprController ends up paying for the swapFee. Even if there isn't a swap fee, the user c...

Aruba Networks EdgeConnect 安全漏洞

Aruba Networks EdgeConnect is an edge connectivity management platform from Aruba Networks, USA. A security vulnerability exists in Aruba Networks EdgeConnect that stems from a command line interface that allows an authenticated remote user to run arbitrary commands on the underlying host...

PoolAdmin can steal NFT from NTokens

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The executeAirdrop function allow pool admin to execute arbitrary call to arbitrary contract, including a transferFrom call to the underlying NFT contract. This can be used by the pool admin to steal NFT inside the NToken contracts. Since the rescueERC72...

WPunk will become locked if liquidator ops to receive the underlying token instead of nToken

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact WPunks received directly as the result of liquidation will be unable to be withdrawn Proof of Concept function withdrawPunkuint256 calldata punkIndexes, address to external nonReentrant INToken nWPunk = INToken Pool.getReserveDataaddressWPunk.xTokenAddre...

CVE-2022-22555

Dell EMC PowerStore, contains an OS command injection Vulnerability. A locally authenticated attacker could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to the execution of arbitrary OS commands on the PowerStore underlying OS, with the privileges of the vulnerable application. Exploitation ma...

Incorrect check in ZcToken.withdraw and ZcToken.redeem leads to underlying tokens not being able to be transferred

Lines of code Vulnerability details Incorrect check in ZcToken.withdraw and ZcToken.redeem leads to underlying tokens not being able to be transferred In both ZcToken.withdraw and ZcToken.redeem, in the case where holder != msg.sender, a check of the msg.sender's ZcToken allowance is performed. B...

Loss of funds in an underlying protocol would cause catostrophic loss of funds for swivel

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Loss of all user funds Proof of Concept This exploit stems from a quirk in the way that exchange rate is tracked for matured positions. We first need to breakdown how interest is calculate for a matured position. In L124 the yield for a matured position ...

onERC721Received() could delegatecall to transder the tokens

Lines of code Vulnerability details onERC721Received could delegatecall to transder the tokens Impact Some onERC721Received could use delegatecall to drain the tokens Putty holds. Because the msg.sender is Putty contract, the tarnsfer can go through. Or taking the ownership of the Putty contract...

The stable ctoken underlying price quote could be manipulated

Lines of code...

User to lose all the funds when lend() to Swivel

Lines of code Vulnerability details function lend uint8 p, address u, uint256 m, uint256 memory a, address y, Swivel.Order calldata o, Swivel.Components calldata s public unpausedp returns uint256 // lent represents the number of underlying tokens lent uint256 lent; // returned represents the...

Transfer the principal token from the lender contract to here but actually transfer underlying token

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Transfer the principal token from the lender contract to here but actually transfer underlying token from lender to redeemer. Proof of Concept // Transfer the principal token from the lender contract to here Safe.transferFromIERC20u, lender, addressthis,...

Funds may be stuck when redeeming for Illuminate

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Funds may be stuck when redeeming for Illuminate. Proof of Concept Assuming the goal of calling redeem for Illuminate here is to redeem the Illuminate principal held by the lender or the redeemer, then there is an issue because the wrong balance is...

Illuminate PT redeeming do not return underlying to a user

Lines of code Vulnerability details In the second step of two step redeeming process, the underlying funds should be located in the Redeemer contract as external system burned the shares the Redeemer obtained from the Lender contract and returned underlying to Redeemer. Then Redeemer's Illuminate...