CVE-2022-38336

An access control issue in MobaXterm before v22.1 allows attackers to make connections to the server via the SSH or SFTP protocols without authentication...

CVE-2022-38337

When aborting a SFTP connection, MobaXterm before v22.1 sends a hardcoded password to the server. The server treats this as an invalid login attempt which can result in a Denial of Service DoS for the user if services like fail2ban are used...

Upgraded Q -> M from #76 [1670347574630]

Judge has assessed an item in Issue 76 as M risk. The relevant finding follows: L02 address.callvalue:x should be used instead of payable.transfer Impact The use of payable.transfer is heavily frowned upon because it can lead to the locking of funds. The transfer call requires that the recipient...

Upgraded Q -> M from #366 [1670366212013]

Judge has assessed an item in Issue 366 as M risk. The relevant finding follows: 1. Not support fee-on-transfer tokens Every tokens of credit line will be transferred from lender to LineOfCredit first, then to borrower later. These 2-transfer steps will make the tax for some fee-on-transfer token...

Design/Logic Flaw

When doing HTTPS transfers, libcurl might erroneously use the read callback CURLOPTREADFUNCTION to ask for data to send, even when the CURLOPTPOSTFIELDS option has been set, if the same handle previously was used to issue a PUT request which used that callback. This flaw may surprise the...

Mobatek MobaXterm 信任管理问题漏洞

Mobatek MobaXterm is a suite of terminal software from the French company Mobatek that integrates an enhanced terminal, an X server and a Unix command set GNU/Cygwin. A security vulnerability exists in Mobatek MobaXterm versions prior to v22.1, which originates when aborting an SFTP connection,...

PT-2022-24374 · Mobaxterm · Mobaxterm

Name of the Vulnerable Software and Affected Versions: MobaXterm versions prior to 22.1 Description: An access control issue allows attackers to make connections to the server via the SSH or SFTP protocols without authentication. Recommendations: For versions prior to 22.1, update to version 22.1...

CVE-2022-32221

When doing HTTPS transfers, libcurl might erroneously use the read callback CURLOPTREADFUNCTION to ask for data to send, even when the CURLOPTPOSTFIELDS option has been set, if the same handle previously was used to issue a PUT request which used that callback. This flaw may surprise the...

CVE-2022-32221

When doing HTTPS transfers, libcurl might erroneously use the read callback CURLOPTREADFUNCTION to ask for data to send, even when the CURLOPTPOSTFIELDS option has been set, if the same handle previously was used to issue a PUT request which used that callback. This flaw may surprise the...

UBUNTU-CVE-2021-37533

Prior to Apache Commons Net 3.9.0, Net's FTP client trusts the host from PASV response by default. A malicious server can redirect the Commons Net code to use a different host, but the user has to connect to the malicious server in the first place. This may lead to leakage of information about...

Apache Commons Net 输入验证错误漏洞

Apache Commons Net is the United States Apache Apache company a library. It implements many of the basic Internet Protocol clients. An input validation error vulnerability exists in Apache Commons Net versions prior to 3.9.0, which stems from the fact that the Net's FTP client trusts a host from ...

CVE-2022-2640

The Config-files of Horner Automation’s RCC 972 with firmware version 15.40 are encrypted with weak XOR encryption vulnerable to reverse engineering. This could allow an attacker to obtain credentials to run services such as File Transfer Protocol FTP and Hypertext Transfer Protocol HTTP...

Horner Automation Remote Compact Controller 加密问题漏洞

The Horner Automation Remote Compact Controller Horner Automation RCC is a compact controller from Horner Automation, USA. A vulnerability exists in Horner Automation Remote Compact Controller 972 firmware version 15.40 due to an encryption issue in the configuration file using weak XOR encryptio...

USN-5747-1 bind9 vulnerabilities

It was discovered that Bind incorrectly handled large query name when using lightweight resolver protocol. A remote attacker could use this issue to consume resources, leading to a denial of service. CVE-2016-2775 It was discovered that Bind incorrectly handled large zone data size received via...

UBUNTU-CVE-2022-4128

A NULL pointer dereference issue was discovered in the Linux kernel in the MPTCP protocol when traversing the subflow list at disconnect time. A local user could use this flaw to potentially crash the system causing a denial of service...

golang: net/http: improper sanitization of Transfer-Encoding header

A flaw was found in golang. The HTTP/1 client accepted invalid Transfer-Encoding headers indicating "chunked" encoding. This issue could allow request smuggling, but only if combined with an intermediate server that also improperly accepts the header as invalid...

varnish: Request Forgery Vulnerability

An HTTP Request Forgery issue was discovered in Varnish Cache. An attacker may introduce characters through HTTP/2 pseudo-headers that are invalid in the context of an HTTP/1 request line, causing the Varnish server to produce invalid HTTP/1 requests to the backend. This could be used to exploit...

varnish: Request Forgery Vulnerability

An HTTP Request Forgery issue was discovered in Varnish Cache. An attacker may introduce characters through HTTP/2 pseudo-headers that are invalid in the context of an HTTP/1 request line, causing the Varnish server to produce invalid HTTP/1 requests to the backend. This could be used to exploit...

Incentive fund loss when calling claim() in AutoPxGlp/PxGmxRewards because it calls this.compound(,,true) which would transfer incentive to contract itself and those funds won't be calculated as rewards or fee and won't be accessible to withdraw

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Function claim in PxGmxReward contract is used for claiming available pxGMX rewards of a user. but this function calls IAutoPxGlpaddressthis.compound1, 1, true; to harvest new rewards and stake them to compound rewards. but this call is external call and...

fee loss in AutoPxGmx and AutoPxGlp and reward loss in AutoPxGlp by calling PirexRewards.claim(pxGmx/pxGpl, AutoPx*) directly which transfers rewards to AutoPx* pool without compound logic get executed and fee calculation logic and pxGmx wouldn't be executed for those rewards

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Function compound in AutoPxGmx and AutoPxGlp contracts is for compounding pxGLP and additionally pxGMX rewards. it works by calling PirexGmx.claimpx, this to collect the rewards of the vault and then swap the received amount to calculate the reward,...