PT-2025-53170

Name of the Vulnerable Software and Affected Versions Linux kernel affected versions not specified Description The Linux kernel contains a flaw within the anysee master xfer function related to a null pointer dereference. The msg variable, controlled by the user, lacks proper validation...

PT-2025-53064

Name of the Vulnerable Software and Affected Versions Linux kernel affected versions not specified Description A flaw exists in the Linux kernel’s gl861 i2c master xfer function within the dvb-usb-v2 module. The issue arises because the msg parameter, controlled by the user, can lead to a null...

CVE-2023-22009

Vulnerability in the Oracle Self-Service Human Resources product of Oracle E-Business Suite component: Workforce Management. Supported versions that are affected are 12.2.3-12.2.12. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle...

CVE-2023-34329

AMI MegaRAC SPx12 contains a vulnerability in BMC where a User may cause an authentication bypass by spoofing the HTTP header. A successful exploit of this vulnerability may lead to loss of confidentiality, integrity, and availability...

Oracle E-Business Suite 跨站脚本漏洞

Oracle E-Business Suite E-Business Suite is a set of fully integrated global business management software from Oracle Oracle. The software provides customer relationship management, service management, financial management and other functions. A security vulnerability exists in the Oracle Scripti...

EulerOS 2.0 SP10 : curl (EulerOS-SA-2023-2350)

According to the versions of the curl packages installed, the EulerOS installation on the remote host is affected by the following vulnerabilities : - An improper certificate validation vulnerability exists in curl v8.1.0 in the way it supports matching of wildcard patterns when listed as 'Subjec...

Deposit transaction is prone to being front-run by bad actors.

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact It is possible for an attacker to front-run a user's deposit transaction while transferring fewer amount of assets than the user and minting an equivalent amount of shares as the user could have. Proof of Concept The scenario described below is for the...

Pending owner can be the wrong recipient of ownership

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact An attacker can call the acceptOwnership function with their address as the pending owner before the legitimate pending owner has a chance to call the function Proof of Concept The transferOwnership function allows the current owner to set a pending owne...

Failed transfer with low level call could be overlooked

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Transfers may fail silently. Proof of Concept According to the Solidity docs: "The low-level functions call, delegatecall and staticcall return true as their first return value if the account called is non-existent, as part of the design of the EVM...

Two-step ownership transfer process in LSP0ERC725AccountCore can be bypassed

Lines of code Vulnerability details Bug Description To transfer ownership of the LSP0ERC725AccountCore contract, the owner has to call transferOwnership to nominate a pending owner. Afterwards, the pending owner must call acceptOwnership to become the new owner. When called by the owner,...

Using supportsERC165InterfaceUnchecked() might break LSP functionality for certain contracts

Lines of code Vulnerability details Bug Description Throughout the codebase, the protocol uses the supportsERC165InterfaceUnchecked function from Openzeppelin's ERC165Checker.sol to check for the support of ERC-165 interface IDs. However, supportsERC165InterfaceUnchecked only checks if the call t...

Potential Reversion in Transfer due to LSP1 Interface Support Check

Lines of code Vulnerability details SORRY I HAVFE PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED THIS ISSUE WITHOUT THE FIX... FIRST TIME WARDEN FORGIVE ME Impact The transfer function in LSP7DigitalAssetCore & LSP8DigitalAssetCore includes a mandatory hook, notifyTokenSender, which verifies if the sender supports...

Potential Reversion in Transfer due to LSP1 Interface Support Check

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The transfer function in LSP7DigitalAssetCore & LSP8DigitalAssetCore includes a mandatory hook, notifyTokenSender, which verifies if the sender supports INTERFACEIDLSP1. However, if a token owner who initially implemented LSP1 interface ceases to support...

IF THE UNDERLYING ASSET IS A FEE ON TRANSFER TOKEN IT COULD BREAK THE INTERNAL ACCOUNTING OF THE VAULT

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The Vault.deposit function is used by the users to deposit assets to the vault and mint vault shares to the recipient address. The amount of assets are transferred to the Vault as follows: SafeERC20.safeTransferFrom asset, caller, addressthis,...

Incorrect amount of tokens is transferred before updating the accumulator and emitting the ContributePrizeTokens event

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact An attacker can call the contributePrizeTokens function with a lower amount of tokens than claimed, misleading the contract to update the accumulator and emit the event based on the incorrect amount. As a result, the prize pool's internal state will be...

Attacker can steal vault funds through the deposit function.

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact In the deposit function, a check is made to see if the amount of assets being deposited by the user is greater than the amount of assets the vault currently holds. The vault then transfers the difference between the assets being deposited and the vault’s...

withdrawReserve will revert when withdrawing tokens with on chain tx fees

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Function will revert when reserve is equal to amount, when the token being transferred is a fee on transfer token. Proof of Concept function withdrawReserve address to, uint104 amount external onlyDrawManager function withdrawReserve address to, uint104...

Mozilla: Use-after-free in WebRTC certificate generation

The Mozilla Foundation Security Advisory describes this flaw as: An attacker could have triggered a use-after-free condition when creating a WebRTC connection over HTTPS...

Lack of check for zero address in the function _transferOwnership before transferring ownership

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The absence of a check for the zero address address0 when transferring ownership can lead to unintended consequences and potential fund loss. If the contract allows transferring ownership to the zero address address0, it effectively means relinquishing...

Unauthorized Withdrawal of ETH by Admin in _withdraw.

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact An attacker with admin privileges can maliciously execute the withdraw function, resulting in the unauthorized withdrawal of all the ETH in the contract. Proof of Concept withdrawNounsDAOStorageV3.StorageV3 storage ds external onlyAdminds returns uint256...