CVE-2022-41556

A resource leak in gwbackend.c in lighttpd 1.4.56 through 1.4.66 could lead to a denial of service connection-slot exhaustion after a large amount of anomalous TCP behavior by clients. It is related to RDHUP mishandling in certain HTTP/1.1 chunked situations. Use of modfastcgi is, for example,...

PT-2022-37523 · Sendmail · Sendmail

Name of the Vulnerable Software and Affected Versions: sendmail affected versions not specified Description: The issue is related to SMTP session reuse, which can lead to STARTTLS not being used even if it is offered. Recommendations: At the moment, there is no information about a newer version...

netty: control chars in header names may lead to HTTP request smuggling

A flaw was found in Netty, specifically in the netty-codec-http package. This flaw allows unauthorized control characters at the beginning and end of a request, does not follow the specification, and can cause HTTP request smuggling...

netty: control chars in header names may lead to HTTP request smuggling

A flaw was found in Netty, specifically in the netty-codec-http package. This flaw allows unauthorized control characters at the beginning and end of a request, does not follow the specification, and can cause HTTP request smuggling...

Romance scammer deepfakes Mark Ruffalo to con elderly artist

Deepfakes have settled into a groove, as most scam techniques do. It seems most deepfakers have decided to make as much cash as possible from unsuspecting victims instead of doing anything particularly earth-shattering with their technology. One curious twist we may not have seen coming is the...

Node.js 14.x < 14.20.0 / 16.x < 16.16.0 / 18.x < 18.5.0 Multiple Vulnerabilities (July 7th 2022 Security Releases).

The version of Node.js installed on the remote host is prior to 14.20.0, 16.16.0, 18.5.0. It is, therefore, affected by multiple vulnerabilities as referenced in the July 7th 2022 Security Releases advisory. - The llhttp parser in the http module does not correctly parse and validate...

Swaps could be blocked temporarily

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact In the swap and swapSupportingFeeOnInputTokens functions the community fee payment is called by the function payCommunityFee. The payCommunityFee will fail if the vault address is 0x0 and all the swap will be reverted by the safeTransfer. The...

Lack of check for contract existance can cause loss of funds during transfers

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The current transfers will not check if the to address is for an existing token contract. This can cause loss of funds if an user attempts to make a swap for a tokens added to a pool and destructed later. Proof of Concept TokenA gets added to a pool The...

After a swap, user can lose input token amount while receiving no output token amount when output token becomes non-existent

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact When calling the swap function below, the following safeTransfer function is further called for transferring the corresponding value of token from the pool to the recipient. Note that safeTransfer does not check for the existence of the token contract...

Minting LP for a token pair that contains a fee on transfer token will cause partial loss of funds for other token in pair

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Partial loss of funds for other token in pair with fee on transfer token Proof of Concept AlgebraPool.solL458-L467 liquidityActual = liquidityDesired; if receivedAmount0 amount0 liquidityActual = uint128FullMath.mulDivuint256liquidityActual,...

AlgebraPool ERC20 Tokens with fee on transfer are not supported

Lines of code Vulnerability details AlgebraPool ERC20 Tokens with fee on transfer are not supported Vulnerability details There are ERC20 tokens that charge fee for every transfer / transferFrom. TransferHelper.safeTransfer relies on ERC20.transfer AlgebraPool.solswap assumes that the received...

Use safeTransferFrom instead of transferFrom for ERC721 transfers

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Any NFTs can be transferred here, there are a few NFTs here’s an example that have logic in the onERC721Received function, which is only triggered in the safeTransferFrom function and not in transferFrom. Tools Used Solidity Visual Developer of VSCode...

Gobblers burnt for minting legendary Gobblers can be transferred out from the address zero

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The mintLegendaryGobbler function burn standard gobblers by setting their owner to address0 without deleting the getApprovedid. So the original owner can setApproval for himself address and transfer the gobbler token back to any address from the address0...

Upgraded Q -> M from 182 [1664281111530]

Judge has assessed an item in Issue 182 as Medium risk. The relevant finding follows: L00: Usage of transfer to send eth The transfer function has a fixed gas stipend of 2300. If a contract as well as EOA can call the function, it is advised to use call function instead of transfer. Here are...

Users can mint legendary gobbler without losing any gobblers

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact In ArtGobblers.mintLegendaryGobbler function, it mints a legendary gobbler by burning multiple standard gobblers. But instead of call burn, it just set getGobblerDataid.owner = address0. All the data of the standard gobbler will stay the same, included...

The vulnerability of the Linux operating system’s kernel, which allows a hacker to gain access to confidential data

The vulnerability of the Linux operating system’s kernel is related to the transfer of protected information in unencrypted form. Exploiting this vulnerability allows an attacker to gain access to confidential data...

after mintLegendaryGobbler(), the burned Gobbler can be transferred back

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact mintLegendaryGobbler burn Gobbler only set the owner=address0, and did not clear getApprovedid, resulting in the transferFrom can be called to transfer back to old owner Proof of Concept Suppose users0 has Gobbler1 steps: step 1:users0 call...

Security Bulletin: IBM WebSphere MQ File Transfer Edition Web Gateway insufficient access control (CVE-2012-2206)

Abstract A low risk security vulnerability in the "Web Gateway" component of IBM WebSphere MQ File Transfer Edition may result in authenticated users being able to access other users' file transfers. Content CVE ID: CVE-2012-2206 DESCRIPTION: When using the web gateway, an authenticated user is...

Security Bulletin: IBM WebSphere MQ File Transfer Edition Web Gateway vulnerable to CSRF attack (CVE-2012-3294)

Abstract A low risk security vulnerability in the "Web Gateway" component of IBM WebSphere MQ File Transfer Edition and WebSphere MQ - Managed File Transfer may be susceptible to a Cross Site Request Forgery attack. Content CVE ID: CVE-2012-3294 DESCRIPTION: When using the web gateway, an...

Recovererc20 uses transfer -> token transfers do not verify that the tokens were successfully transferred (safeTransfer)

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Some tokens do not revert the transaction when the transfer function fails or return false. Which requires us to check the return value after calling the transfer function. Given that recoverERC20 can accept any tokens. A token such as ZRX would not reve...