Lucene search
+L

2771 matches found

Code423n4
Code423n4
•added 2021/10/15 12:00 a.m.•15 views

User funds are lost in case of non supported market token deposit

Handle csanuragjain Vulnerability details Impact User funds can be lost as current logic cannot withdraw unsupported market token even though deposit can be done for same Proof of Concept 1. Navigate to 2. Check the function deposit function depositaddress token, uint256 amount external override...

6.9AI score
SaveExploits0
Code423n4
Code423n4
•added 2021/10/13 12:00 a.m.•12 views

Summarize your findings for the bug or vulnerability

Handle AC0611 Vulnerability details Impact Detailed description of the impact of this finding. Proof of Concept Provide direct links to all referenced code in GitHub. Add screenshots, logs, or any other relevant proof that illustrates the concept. Tools Used Recommended Mitigation Steps --- The...

7.1AI score
SaveExploits0
Code423n4
Code423n4
•added 2021/10/13 12:00 a.m.•38 views

Wrong keeper reward computation

Handle cmichel Vulnerability details The PoolKeeper.keeperReward computation mixes WADs and Quads which leads to issues. 1. Note that keeperTip returns values where 1 = 1%, and 100 = 100%, the same way BASETIP = 5 = 5%. Thus tipPercent = ABDKMathQuad.fromUIntkeeperTip is a Quad value of this keep...

6.8AI score
SaveExploits0
Gitee
Gitee
•added 2021/10/09 2:52 p.m.•16 views

Exploit for Path Traversal in Microsoft

This repository is an exploit module for CVE-2021-40444, a remote code execution vulnerability in Microsoft Office Word. The repository contains a Python script exploit.py that generates a malicious docx document, a Windows DLL calc.dll that pops a calc.exe when executed, and a server script...

8.8CVSS8.1AI score0.9745EPSS
SaveExploits38
Code423n4
Code423n4
•added 2021/10/06 12:00 a.m.•16 views

Wrong inequality when adding/removing liquidity in current price range

Handle cmichel Vulnerability details The ConcentratedLiquidityPool.mint/burn functions add/remove liquidity when priceLower currentPrice && currentPrice priceUpper. Shouldn't it also be changed if priceLower == currentPrice? Impact Pools that mint/burn liquidity at a time where the currentPrice i...

6.8AI score
SaveExploits0
Code423n4
Code423n4
•added 2021/10/06 12:00 a.m.•23 views

DDOS by cancelling orders or removing approvals

Handle cmichel Vulnerability details The market assumes that the maker of an order approved the swivel contract as there are many calls that move funds from the maker to the contract, see Swivel.initiateVaultFillingZcTokenInitiate/initiateZcTokenFillingVaultInitiate: uToken.transferFromo.maker,...

6.7AI score
SaveExploits0
Code423n4
Code423n4
•added 2021/10/06 12:00 a.m.•20 views

Previously created markets can be overwritten

Handle 0xRajeev Vulnerability details Impact The createMarket function allows accidental overwriting of previously created markets for the same combination of underlying and maturity timestamp u, m because there is no zero-address check to see if a previously created market exists for that...

6.8AI score
SaveExploits0
Code423n4
Code423n4
•added 2021/10/06 12:00 a.m.•13 views

Markets Do Not Operate Correctly on Non-Standard Tokens

Handle leastwood Vulnerability details Impact There are a number of functions which interact with uToken in Swivel.sol but do not check the return value of the associated transfer, approve or transferFrom call. As a result, if a market is created using a non-standard token, a failed call will be...

7AI score
SaveExploits0
Code423n4
Code423n4
•added 2021/10/06 12:00 a.m.•14 views

ConcentratedLiquidityPoolHelper.getTickState reverts

Handle cmichel Vulnerability details ConcentratedLiquidityPoolHelper.getTickState allocates only tickCount elements for the ticks array. But the while loop iterates over all ticks of the pool which can potentially become very large, much larger than any tickCount could iterate in a reasonable tim...

6.9AI score
SaveExploits0
Code423n4
Code423n4
•added 2021/10/06 12:00 a.m.•11 views

ConcentratedLiquidityPoolManager.sol#reclaimIncentive() Unsafe implementation allows malicious users to steal yield

Handle WatchPug Vulnerability details The reclaimIncentive function allows users who added incentives before to withdraw unclaimed rewards. However, the current implementation did not manage the state correctly, incentive.rewardsUnclaimed is not updated after the token transfer, which allows the...

6.9AI score
SaveExploits0
Code423n4
Code423n4
•added 2021/10/06 12:00 a.m.•10 views

Wrong reserve decrease in burn

Handle 0xsanson Vulnerability details Impact When burning a liquidity position the reserves should be decreased by the tokens' amount that leaves the contract. However in ConcentratedLiquidityPool's burn they are decreased only by the fees. Proof of Concept Tools Used editor Recommended Mitigatio...

6.8AI score
SaveExploits0
Code423n4
Code423n4
•added 2021/10/06 12:00 a.m.•15 views

ConcentratedLiquidityPoolManager: reclaimIncentive() does not decrement rewardsUnclaimed

Handle hickuphh3 Vulnerability details Impact reclaimIncentive withdraws any unclaimed rewards to the incentive owner. While there is a check to prevent re-claiming of rewards requireincentive.rewardsUnclaimed = amount, "ALREADYCLAIMED"; it is ineffective because incentive.rewardsUnclaimed is not...

6.9AI score
SaveExploits0
Code423n4
Code423n4
•added 2021/10/06 12:00 a.m.•17 views

Admin is a single-point of failure without any mitigations

Handle 0xRajeev Vulnerability details Impact Admin role has absolute power across Swivel, Marketplace and VaultTracker contracts with several onlyOwner functions. There is no ability to change admin to a new address or renounce it which is helpful for lost/compromised admin keys or to delegate...

6.9AI score
SaveExploits0
Code423n4
Code423n4
•added 2021/10/06 12:00 a.m.•14 views

Wrong index when accessing incentives

Handle pauliax Vulnerability details Impact Should be incentiveId, not positionId here: Incentive memory incentive = incentivespoolpositionId; Recommended Mitigation Steps Incentive memory incentive = incentivespoolincentiveId; --- The text was updated successfully, but these errors were...

7AI score
SaveExploits0
Code423n4
Code423n4
•added 2021/10/06 12:00 a.m.•15 views

ConcentratedLiquidityPool: incorrect feeGrowthGlobal accounting when crossing ticks

Handle hickuphh3 Vulnerability details Impact Swap fees are taken from the output. Hence, if swapping token0 for token1 zeroForOne is true, then fees are taken in token1. We see this to be the case in the initialization of feeGrowthGlobal in the swap cache feeGrowthGlobal = zeroForOne ?...

6.9AI score
SaveExploits0
Code423n4
Code423n4
•added 2021/10/06 12:00 a.m.•9 views

ConcentratedLiquidityPoolManager: incentive is incorrectly accessed

Handle hickuphh3 Vulnerability details Impact The positionId is used to retrieve the incentive info instead of incentiveId. Incentive storage / memory incentive = incentivesposition.poolpositionId; Recommended Mitigation Steps Incentive storage / memory incentive =...

7AI score
SaveExploits0
Code423n4
Code423n4
•added 2021/10/05 12:00 a.m.•13 views

Erc20.approve() return value is ignored

Handle pants Vulnerability details According to the ERC-20 Token Standard, the function approve returns false on failure. However, the return value of Erc20.approve is ignored 3 times: 1. In Swivel.initiateVaultFillingZcTokenInitiate, line 109. 2. In Swivel.initiateZcTokenFillingVaultInitiate, li...

7.1AI score
SaveExploits0
Code423n4
Code423n4
•added 2021/09/29 12:00 a.m.•13 views

IndexPool._pow wrong loop and does not normalize values

Handle cmichel Vulnerability details The IndexPool.compute function is indented as if the if n % 2 != 0 output = output a; is inside the loop but there are actually not braces around it. It must be in the loop for the exponentiation by repeated squaring algorithm to work: function powuint256 a,...

7.1AI score
SaveExploits0
Code423n4
Code423n4
•added 2021/09/29 12:00 a.m.•10 views

Wrong balance to reserve casting in _updateReserves()

Handle 0xsanson Vulnerability details Impact In HybridPool's updateReserves function, the reserves are calculated as: uint256 reserve0, uint256 reserve1 = balance; This is incorrect, since reserves are a bento-share quantity, while balance outputs a bento-amount quantity. This basically inflates...

6.9AI score
SaveExploits0
Code423n4
Code423n4
•added 2021/09/29 12:00 a.m.•13 views

Users are susceptible to back-running when depositing ETH to TridenRouter

Handle broccoli Vulnerability details Impact The depositToBentoBox and depositFromUserToBentoBox allow users to provide ETH to the router, which is later deposited to the bento contract for swapping other assets or providing liquidity. However, in these two functions, the input parameter does not...

6.7AI score
SaveExploits0
Rows per page
Query Builder