CVE-2025-59321: Initialization of a Resource with an Insecure Default

CPSD CryptoPro Secure Disk for Bitlocker before v7.7.4 contains a default TPM PCR policy that fails to consider the system boot state. This allows the TPM to be unsealed via an unintended execution path or from another hardware platform...

CVE-2025-59327: Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature

In CPSD CryptoPro Secure Disk for Bitlocker before v7.7.4, bootxsa.efi fails to properly validate LUKS encryption and, if encryption is present, all CryptoPro file integrity checks are skipped...

PT-2026-71072

Name of the Vulnerable Software and Affected Versions CryptoPro Secure Disk for Bitlocker versions prior to 7.7.4 Description The software fails to properly validate LUKS Linux Unified Key Setup encryption. When encryption is detected, the system skips all CryptoPro file integrity checks, which a...

CVE-2025-10010

The CPSD CryptoPro Secure Disk application boots a small Linux operating system to perform user authentication before using BitLocker to decrypt the Windows partition. The system is located on a separate unencrypted partition which can be reached by anyone with access to the hard disk. Multiple...

CVE-2025-10010

The CPSD CryptoPro Secure Disk application boots a small Linux operating system to perform user authentication before using BitLocker to decrypt the Windows partition. The system is located on a separate unencrypted partition which can be reached by anyone with access to the hard disk. Multiple...

CVE-2025-10010

The CPSD CryptoPro Secure Disk application boots a small Linux operating system to perform user authentication before using BitLocker to decrypt the Windows partition. The system is located on a separate unencrypted partition which can be reached by anyone with access to the hard disk. Multiple...

CVE-2025-10010 Integrity Validation Bypass in CryptoPro Secure Disk for BitLocker

The CPSD CryptoPro Secure Disk application boots a small Linux operating system to perform user authentication before using BitLocker to decrypt the Windows partition. The system is located on a separate unencrypted partition which can be reached by anyone with access to the hard disk. Multiple...

CVE-2025-10010 Integrity Validation Bypass in CryptoPro Secure Disk for BitLocker

The CPSD CryptoPro Secure Disk application boots a small Linux operating system to perform user authentication before using BitLocker to decrypt the Windows partition. The system is located on a separate unencrypted partition which can be reached by anyone with access to the hard disk. Multiple...

EUVD-2025-208086

The CPSD CryptoPro Secure Disk application boots a small Linux operating system to perform user authentication before using BitLocker to decrypt the Windows partition. The system is located on a separate unencrypted partition which can be reached by anyone with access to the hard disk. Multiple...

CVE-2025-10010

The CPSD CryptoPro Secure Disk application is vulnerable to an integrity validation bypass. The software boots a small Linux operating system to perform user authentication before using BitLocker to decrypt a Windows partition; this Linux system resides on a separate, unencrypted partition access...

CVE-2025-10010

The CPSD CryptoPro Secure Disk application boots a small Linux operating system to perform user authentication before using BitLocker to decrypt the Windows partition. The system is located on a separate unencrypted partition which can be reached by anyone with access to the hard disk. Multiple...

PT-2026-21741

Name of the Vulnerable Software and Affected Versions CPSD CryptoPro Secure Disk affected versions not specified Description The CPSD CryptoPro Secure Disk application utilizes a small Linux operating system for user authentication prior to BitLocker decryption of the Windows partition. The Linux...

CVE-2025-10010: Missing Support for Integrity Check

The CPSD CryptoPro Secure Disk application boots a small Linux operating system to perform user authentication before using BitLocker to decrypt the Windows partition. The system is located on a separate unencrypted partition which can be reached by anyone with access to the hard disk. Multiple...

CPSD CryptoPro Secure Disk 安全漏洞

CPSD CryptoPro Secure Disk is a transparent disk encryption software developed by CPSD. There is a security vulnerability in CPSD CryptoPro Secure Disk. This vulnerability stems from the fact that configuration files in the Linux operating system’s integrity checks are not verified through the...

EUVD-2022-37258

Malicious code in bioql PyPI...

Linux Distros Unpatched Vulnerability : CVE-2022-34301

The Linux/Unix host has one or more packages installed that are impacted by a vulnerability without a vendor supplied patch available. - A flaw was found in CryptoPro Secure Disk bootloaders before 2022-06-01. An attacker may use this bootloader to bypass or tamper with Secure Boot protections. I...

Oracle Linux 9 : fwupd (ELSA-2023-2487)

The remote Oracle Linux 9 host has packages installed that are affected by multiple vulnerabilities as referenced in the ELSA-2023-2487 advisory. 1.8.10-2.0.1 - Drop pesign.service restart in postun Orabug: 34760075 - Update signing certificate JIRA: OLDIS-16371 - Rebuild for SecureBoot signature...

shim: 3rd party shim allow secure boot bypass

A flaw was found in CryptoPro Secure Disk bootloaders before 2022-06-01. An attacker may use this bootloader to bypass or tamper with Secure Boot protections. In order to load and execute arbitrary code in the pre-boot stage, an attacker simply needs to replace the existing signed bootloader...

CVE-2022-34301

A flaw was found in CryptoPro Secure Disk bootloaders before 2022-06-01. An attacker may use this bootloader to bypass or tamper with Secure Boot protections. In order to load and execute arbitrary code in the pre-boot stage, an attacker simply needs to replace the existing signed bootloader...

CVE-2022-34301

A flaw was found in CryptoPro Secure Disk bootloaders before 2022-06-01. An attacker may use this bootloader to bypass or tamper with Secure Boot protections. In order to load and execute arbitrary code in the pre-boot stage, an attacker simply needs to replace the existing signed bootloader...