1679 matches found
CVE-2025-27371
In certain IETF OAuth 2.0-related specifications, when the JSON Web Token Profile for OAuth 2.0 Client Authentication mechanism is used, there are ambiguities in the audience values of JWTs sent to authorization servers. The affected RFCs may include RFC 7523, and also RFC 7521, RFC 7522, RFC 910...
CVE-2025-27371
In certain IETF OAuth 2.0-related specifications, when the JSON Web Token Profile for OAuth 2.0 Client Authentication mechanism is used, there are ambiguities in the audience values of JWTs sent to authorization servers. The affected RFCs may include RFC 7523, and also RFC 7521, RFC 7522, RFC 910...
CVE-2025-27371
In certain IETF OAuth 2.0-related specifications, when the JSON Web Token Profile for OAuth 2.0 Client Authentication mechanism is used, there are ambiguities in the audience values of JWTs sent to authorization servers. The affected RFCs may include RFC 7523, and also RFC 7521, RFC 7522, RFC 910...
CVE-2025-27371
Technical details for CVE-2025-27371 are not publicly available in the provided documents. The materials do not specify affected products, versions, impact, or remediation. Monitor for updates.
CVE-2024-1509
CVE-2024-1509 affects Brocade ASCG prior to version 3.2.0, where the web interface does not enforce HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) for ports 8030 and 8100. Root cause: missing HSTS enforcement increases susceptibility to downgrade and SSL-stripping MITM attacks and weakens cookie-hijacking...
CVE-2025-23189
Due to missing authorization check in an RFC enabled function module in transaction SDCCN, an authenticated attacker could generate technical meta-data. This leads to a low impact on integrity. There is no impact on confidentiality or availability...
CVE-2024-12797 RFC7250 handshakes with unauthenticated servers don't abort as expected
Issue summary: Clients using RFC7250 Raw Public Keys RPKs to authenticate a server may fail to notice that the server was not authenticated, because handshakes don't abort as expected when the SSLVERIFYPEER verification mode is set. Impact summary: TLS and DTLS connections using raw public keys m...
When xdg-mail is configured to use thunderbird for mailto URLs, improper parsing of the URL can lead to additional headers being passed to thunderbird that should not be included per RFC 2368. An attacker can use this method to create a mailto URL that looks safe to users, but will actually attach files when clicked.
...
CVE-2025-23189
Due to missing authorization check in an RFC enabled function module in transaction SDCCN, an authenticated attacker could generate technical meta-data. This leads to a low impact on integrity. There is no impact on confidentiality or availability...
CVE-2025-23187
Due to missing authorization check in an RFC enabled function module in transaction SDCCN, an unauthenticated attacker could generate technical meta-data. This leads to a low impact on integrity. There is no impact on confidentiality or availability...
CVE-2025-24870
CVE-2025-24870 affects SAP GUI for Windows (and RFC service) where credentials are stored in the process memory. This can allow an unauthenticated (local) attacker to access sensitive information and cause privilege escalation, with confidentiality impact but no reported integrity/availability im...
CVE-2025-23189 Missing Authorization Check in SAP NetWeaver and ABAP Platform (SDCCN)
Due to missing authorization check in an RFC enabled function module in transaction SDCCN, an authenticated attacker could generate technical meta-data. This leads to a low impact on integrity. There is no impact on confidentiality or availability...
CVE-2022-41264
Due to the unrestricted scope of the RFC function module, SAP BASIS - versions 731, 740, 750, 751, 752, 753, 754, 755, 756, 757, 789, 790, 791, allows an authenticated non-administrator attacker to access a system class and execute any of its public methods with parameters provided by the attacke...
Python Improper Input Validation Vulnerability (Jan 2025) - Windows
Python is prone to an improper input validation vulnerability in the urllib.parse.urlsplit and urlparse standard functions. SPDX-FileCopyrightText: 2025 Greenbone AG Some text descriptions might be excerpted from a referenced sources, and are Copyright C by the respective right holders...
CVE-2025-0938
A flaw was found in Python. The Python standard library functions urllib.parse.urlsplit and urlparse accept domain names that included square brackets, which isn't valid according to RFC 3986. Square brackets are only meant to be used as delimiters for specifying IPv6 and IPvFuture hosts in URLs...
CVE-2025-0938
The Python standard library functions urllib.parse.urlsplit and urlparse accepted domain names that included square brackets which isn't valid according to RFC 3986. Square brackets are only meant to be used as delimiters for specifying IPv6 and IPvFuture hosts in URLs. This could result in...
CVE-2025-0938 URL parser allowed square brackets in domain names
The Python standard library functions urllib.parse.urlsplit and urlparse accepted domain names that included square brackets which isn't valid according to RFC 3986. Square brackets are only meant to be used as delimiters for specifying IPv6 and IPvFuture hosts in URLs. This could result in...
CVE-2025-0938 URL parser allowed square brackets in domain names
The Python standard library functions urllib.parse.urlsplit and urlparse accepted domain names that included square brackets which isn't valid according to RFC 3986. Square brackets are only meant to be used as delimiters for specifying IPv6 and IPvFuture hosts in URLs. This could result in...
PSF-2025-1
The Python standard library functions urllib.parse.urlsplit and urlparse accepted domain names that included square brackets which isn't valid according to RFC 3986. Square brackets are only meant to be used as delimiters for specifying IPv6 and IPvFuture hosts in URLs. This could result in...
CVE-2025-0938
Summary (CVE-2025-0938): The issue arises in Python’s standard library URL parsing, where urllib.parse.urlsplit/urlparse accepted domain names containing square brackets, contrary to RFC 3986. This leads to differential parsing between Python’s parser and other RFC-compliant parsers. The connecte...