[M-01] Denial of Service with failed call Dos

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Detailed description of the impact of this finding. External calls can fail accidentally or deliberately, which can cause a DoS condition in the contract. To minimize the damage caused by such failures, it is better to isolate each external call into its...

Unchecked that the to address is nto the address of the tokens

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact In the swap function, it is unchecked that the to address is not the address of the tokens. This will not lead to a loss of funds because the flashloan will actually revert, but sanity checks like this one should be made following for instance uniswap...

Unhandled Revert in _performERC721Transfer Function Resulting in Loss of Tokens.

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact transferFrom function is used to transfer ownership of ERC721 tokens from one address to another. If this function reverts, it means that the transfer failed, and the ownership of the tokens should not be changed. However, the code in the...

setRelayer function not checking for null relayer address

Lines of code Vulnerability details Summary When calling the setRelayer function with a null relayer address, the function does not check for this and allows the address to be set. This issue can cause the contract to fail when calling the executeCalls function and potentially cause loss of funds...

Relayer/executor-already-set Error in CrossChainRelayerArbitrum Contract

Lines of code Vulnerability details Summary The setExecutor function in the CrossChainRelayerArbitrum contract improperly reverts when the executor variable has already been set. Impact This bug could prevent the CrossChainRelayerArbitrum contract from properly setting the executor variable,...

1) THERE IS CONFLICT IN REQUIRE STATMENT. IN finalizeDeposit FUNCTION CHECKS require (msg.sender == l1Bridge, "mq"). IN bridgeMint FUNCTION IMPLEMENTATIONS onlyBridge Modifier CHECKS require(msg.sender == l2Bridge).

Lines of code Vulnerability details 1. Impact Let assume if we calling bridgeMint from finalizeDeposit function the msg.sender is l1bridge . if the msg.sender is not l1bridge can't run the finalizeDeposit but as per bridgeMint the msg.sender should be l2bridge. So it will cause the conflict . the...

msg.sender token balance is not checked before calling safeTransferFrom function

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact createAuction FUNCTION and bid FUNCTION: Without checking the msg.sender token balance the transfer function may be failed to transfer token from msg.sender to contract address . this may cause a transactions failures. Same instance in 2 times PROOF OF...

A malicious Admin can call numerous number of times the function withdrawAdmin() and result in Deniel of Service.

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact This issue can result in Deniel of Service and potentially locking all the users's activeClaim in the contract. Proof of Concept The function withdrawAdmin is used by the Admin to withdraw unallocated tokens. "uint256 amountRemaining" allows the admin to...

PT-2022-15562 · WordPress · Wpide

Name of the Vulnerable Software and Affected Versions: WPIDE WordPress plugin versions prior to 3.0 Description: The issue arises from the lack of sanitization and validation of the filename parameter before it is used in a require statement within the admin dashboard, leading to a Local File...

CVE-2022-2261: Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory

The WPIDE WordPress plugin before 3.0 does not sanitize and validate the filename parameter before using it in a require statement in the admin dashboard, leading to a Local File Inclusion issue...

Use safetransfer/safetransferFrom consistently instead of transfer/transferFrom

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Its a good to add require statement to checks the return value of token transfer or using safetransfer or safetransferFrom on Openzeppelin to ensure the token revert when transfer failure. Failure to do so will cause silent failures of transfer and affec...

Caller can receive liquidatorCut without transferring underlying when calling payBase()

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact If baseJoin's available balance is greater than callers' amount no underlying will be transferred but caller still gets liquidatorCut. This may also negatively impact the accounting since its updated under the assumption that the caller will transfer...

Unsafe _price cast

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The price provided by chainlink AggregatorV3 could be a negative, if that happend the cast of the price goes high, in example, cast -1 to uint256 was 2256 - 1 Proof of Concept return uint256price.adjustDecimalsfeedDecimals, decimals; Tools Used Manual...

Overpaying ETH in InfinityExchange

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact A user of the InfinityExchange contract can accidentally send more ETH than needed without the possibility to get the overpaid amount refunded. Proof of Concept if isMakerSeller && currency == address0 requiremsg.value = totalPrice, 'invalid total price'...

user can pay alot of money with out getting his tokens

Lines of code Vulnerability details lockveasset function: lockveasset functoin should do some transfer but if that dosnt happen then user can can loose alot of money and if incentiveveasset is 0 because the check is 0 and if statment will not pass and the minting will not happen and your not goin...

All the scxMinted is at risk of being burnt.(Limbo.sol)

Handle Hawkeye Vulnerability details Impact If one of the variables that calculate adjustedRectangle is a zero value,it will impair the calculation of excessSCX which would equal to all of the scxMinted on line 219.Nothing will be deducted from scxMinted on line 229 since adjustedRectangle =0...

Unchecked return value for token.transfer call

Handle WatchPug Vulnerability details It is usually good to add a require-statement that checks the return value or to use something like safeTransfer; unless one is sure the given token reverts in case of a failure. Instances include: token.transfermsg.sender, amount; token.transfermsg.sender,...

Unchecked return value for token.transferFrom call

Handle WatchPug Vulnerability details It is usually good to add a require-statement that checks the return value or to use something like safeTransferFrom; unless one is sure the given token reverts in case of a failure. /// ... /// @param token Token that will be issued through this launch event...

Unchecked return value for token.transfer call

Handle WatchPug Vulnerability details It is usually good to add a require-statement that checks the return value or to use something like safeTransfer; unless one is sure the given token reverts in case of a failure. Instances include: IERC20Upgradeablevault.transferto, minTokenIn-amountToken;...

Missing Emergency Pause Check

Handle defsec Vulnerability details Impact During the manual code review, It has been observed that minting progress is not checked when the contract is emergency paused. This can cause misfunctionality and unlocking user funds during the emergency pausing. Proof of Concept 1- Navigate to ""...