6023 matches found
CVE-2025-34249
Nagios Fusion versions prior to 2024R2.1 contain a brute-force bypass in the Two-Factor Authentication 2FA implementation. The application did not properly enforce rate limiting or account lockout for repeated failed 2FA verification attempts, allowing a remote attacker to repeatedly try...
CVE-2025-12094
The OOPSpam Anti-Spam: Spam Protection for WordPress Forms & Comments No CAPTCHA plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to IP Header Spoofing in all versions up to, and including, 1.2.53. This is due to the plugin trusting client-controlled forwarded headers such as CF-Connecting-IP, X-Forwarded-For,...
CVE-2025-12094
Summary of CVE-2025-12094 (WordPress OOPSpam Anti-Spam plugin) : The WordPress plugin is vulnerable to IP header spoofing due to trusting client-controlled forwarded headers (e.g., CF-Connecting-IP, X-Forwarded-For) without verifying their provenance. This affects all versions up to and including...
CVE-2025-12094 OOPSpam Anti-Spam: Spam Protection for WordPress Forms & Comments (No CAPTCHA) <= 1.2.53 - Unauthenticated IP Header Spoofing
The OOPSpam Anti-Spam: Spam Protection for WordPress Forms & Comments No CAPTCHA plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to IP Header Spoofing in all versions up to, and including, 1.2.53. This is due to the plugin trusting client-controlled forwarded headers such as CF-Connecting-IP, X-Forwarded-For,...
CVE-2025-12094 OOPSpam Anti-Spam: Spam Protection for WordPress Forms & Comments (No CAPTCHA) <= 1.2.53 - Unauthenticated IP Header Spoofing
The OOPSpam Anti-Spam: Spam Protection for WordPress Forms & Comments No CAPTCHA plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to IP Header Spoofing in all versions up to, and including, 1.2.53. This is due to the plugin trusting client-controlled forwarded headers such as CF-Connecting-IP, X-Forwarded-For,...
EUVD-2025-37313
The OOPSpam Anti-Spam: Spam Protection for WordPress Forms & Comments No CAPTCHA plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to IP Header Spoofing in all versions up to, and including, 1.2.53. This is due to the plugin trusting client-controlled forwarded headers such as CF-Connecting-IP, X-Forwarded-For,...
EUVD-2025-37225
Nagios Fusion versions prior to 2024R2.1 contain a brute-force bypass in the Two-Factor Authentication 2FA implementation. The application did not properly enforce rate limiting or account lockout for repeated failed 2FA verification attempts, allowing a remote attacker to repeatedly try...
PT-2025-44591
Name of the Vulnerable Software and Affected Versions OOPSpam Anti-Spam plugin for WordPress versions through 1.2.53 Description The OOPSpam Anti-Spam plugin for WordPress is susceptible to IP Header Spoofing. The plugin improperly trusts client-controlled forwarded headers, such as...
CVE-2025-34249
Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority as it is a duplicate of CVE-2025-60425...
CVE-2025-34249
CVE-2025-34249 relates to Nagios Fusion prior to 2024R2.1 and describes a brute-force bypass of the 2FA implementation due to inadequate rate limiting/account lockout, enabling repeated second-factor attempts and potential authentication compromise. Red Hat and ENISA references corroborate a 2FA ...
CVE-2025-34249
...
GO-2025-4051 Mattermost Server does not enforce rate limits on password change attempts in github.com/mattermost/mattermost-server
Mattermost Server does not enforce rate limits on password change attempts in github.com/mattermost/mattermost-server...
PT-2025-44461
Name of the Vulnerable Software and Affected Versions Nagios Fusion versions prior to 2024R2.1 Description The application lacks proper rate limiting or account lockout mechanisms for repeated failed Two-Factor Authentication 2FA verification attempts. This allows a remote attacker to repeatedly...
GHSA-XRW9-R35X-X878 Zitadel allows brute-forcing authentication factors
Summary A vulnerability in Zitadel allowed brute-force attack on OTP, TOTP and password allowing to impersonate the attacked user. Impact An attacker can perform an online brute-force attack on OTP, TOTP, and passwords. While Zitadel allows preventing online brute force attacks in scenarios like...
Brute Force
Overview Affected versions of this package are vulnerable to Brute Force via insufficient enforcement of authentication attempt limits in the authentication process. An attacker can gain unauthorized access to user accounts by performing automated brute-force attacks against OTP, TOTP, or passwor...
Brute Force
Overview Affected versions of this package are vulnerable to Brute Force via insufficient enforcement of authentication attempt limits in the authentication process. An attacker can gain unauthorized access to user accounts by performing automated brute-force attacks against OTP, TOTP, or passwor...
UBUNTU-CVE-2025-40034
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: PCI/AER: Avoid NULL pointer dereference in aerratelimit When platform firmware supplies error information to the OS, e.g., via the ACPI APEI GHES mechanism, it may identify an error source device that doesn't advertise an AER...
BIT-VAULT-2025-12044 Vault Vulnerable to Denial of Service Due to Rate Limit Regression
Vault and Vault Enterprise “Vault” are vulnerable to an unauthenticated denial of service when processing JSON payloads. This occurs due to a regression from a previous fix for +HCSEC-2025-24+|https://discuss.hashicorp.com/t/hcsec-2025-24-vault-denial-of-service-though-complex-json-payloads/76393...