lp-uthai.com Cross Site Scripting vulnerability OBB-2540983

Following the coordinated and responsible vulnerability disclosure guidelines of the ISO 29147 standard, Open Bug Bounty has: a. verified the vulnerability and confirmed its existence; b. notified the website operator about its existence. Technical details of the vulnerability are currently hidde...

lp-uthai.com Cross Site Scripting vulnerability OBB-2522317

Following the coordinated and responsible vulnerability disclosure guidelines of the ISO 29147 standard, Open Bug Bounty has: a. verified the vulnerability and confirmed its existence; b. notified the website operator about its existence. Technical details of the vulnerability are currently hidde...

CVE-2022-0271

The LearnPress WordPress plugin before 4.1.6 does not sanitise and escape the lp-dismiss-notice before outputting it back via the lpbackgroundsingleemail AJAX action, leading to a Reflected Cross-Site Scripting...

CVE-2022-0271

The LearnPress WordPress plugin before 4.1.6 does not sanitise and escape the lp-dismiss-notice before outputting it back via the lpbackgroundsingleemail AJAX action, leading to a Reflected Cross-Site Scripting...

Frontrunning of setPerTokenWalletCap edge case

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The setPerTokenWalletCap function in WhitelistPeriodManager.sol contains a comment stating: Special care must be taken when calling this function There are no checks for perTokenWalletCap since it's onlyOwner, but it's essential that it should be = max l...

[WP-H14] LiquidityProviders.sol The share price of the LP can be manipulated and making future liquidityProviders unable to removeLiquidity()

Lines of code Vulnerability details function removeLiquidityuint256 nftId, uint256 amount external nonReentrant onlyValidLpTokennftId, msgSender whenNotPaused address tokenAddress, uint256 nftSuppliedLiquidity, uint256 totalNFTShares = lpToken.tokenMetadatanftId;...

ThecosomataETH.addLiquidity can be subject to sandwich attack

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Liquidity addition can happen at a manipulated pool state and result in receiving fewer LP shares than actual market state dictates Proof of Concept addLiquidity measures slippage based on the pool returned amount via calctokenamount: Pool returned amoun...

LP pricing formula is vulnerable to flashloan manipulation

Handle shw Vulnerability details Impact The LP pricing formula used in the burnAsset function of LimboDAO is vulnerable to flashloan manipulation. By swapping a large number of EYE into the underlying pool, an attacker can intentionally inflate the value of the LP tokens to get more fate than he ...

Mageia: Security Advisory (MGASA-2014-0170)

The remote host is missing an update for the SPDX-FileCopyrightText: 2022 Greenbone AG Some text descriptions might be excerpted from a referenced sources, and are Copyright C by the respective right holders. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only ifdescription...

Users can lose value in emergency state

Handle cmichel Vulnerability details Imagine the following sequence of events: LaunchEvent.createPair is called which sets wavaxReserve = 0, adds liquidity to the pair and receives lpSupply LP tokens. LaunchEvent.allowEmergencyWithdraw is called which enters emergency / paused mode and disallows...

LP Tokens May Be Locked in Contract Due to allowEmergencyWithdraw() in Stage 3

Handle kirk-baird Vulnerability details Impact The function allowEmergencyWithdraw may be called by the rocketJoeFactory.owner at any time. If it is called while the protocol is in Stage 3 and a pair has been created then the LP tokens will be locked and both issues and depositors will be unable ...

[WP-H1] The value of LP token can be manipulated by the first minister, which allows the attacker to dilute future liquidity providers' shares

Handle WatchPug Vulnerability details For the first minter of an Exchange pool, the ratio of X/Y and the totalSupply of the LP token can be manipulated. A sophisticated attacker can mint and burn all of the LP tokens but 1 Wei, and then artificially create a situation of rebasing up by transferri...

LP inflation attack is possible as pools can be created with zero liquidity

Handle hyh Vulnerability details Impact A griefing by LP inflation attack is possible: an attacker can create pools for popular token pairs, provide a tiny amount of initial liquidity with addLiquidity, then send big enough amounts of base and quote tokens to the pool contract Exchange just...

Manipulation of the Y State Results in Interest Rate Manipulation

Handle Rhynorater Vulnerability details Impact Due to lack of constraints on user input in the TimeswapPair.solmint function, an attacker can arbitrarily modify the interest rate while only paying a minimal amount of Asset Token and Collateral Token. Disclosure: This is my first time attempting...

lpauto.com.pt Cross Site Scripting vulnerability OBB-2314370

Following the coordinated and responsible vulnerability disclosure guidelines of the ISO 29147 standard, Open Bug Bounty has: a. verified the vulnerability and confirmed its existence; b. notified the website operator about its existence. Technical details of the vulnerability are currently hidde...

Using single total native reserve variable for synth and non-synth reserves of VaderPoolV2 can lead to losses for synth holders

Handle hyh Vulnerability details Impact Users that mint synths do provide native assets, increasing native reserve pool, but do not get any liquidity shares issued. In the same time, an exit of non-synth liquidity provider yields releasing a proportion of all current reserves to him. Whenever an...

Griefing attack is possible as NFTXStakingZap, PalmNFTXStakingZap, NFTXMarketplaceZap rely on zero vault token balance for LP and minting

Handle hyh Vulnerability details Impact NFTXStakingZap and PalmNFTXStakingZap liquidity provision and NFTXMarketplaceZap minting will be blocked as addLiquidity and mint functions will revert all the time. An attacker can transfer a tiny amount of vault tokens to NFTXStakingZap/PalmNFTXStakingZap...

LPs of VaderPoolV2 can manipulate pool reserves to extract funds from the reserve.

Handle TomFrenchBlockchain Vulnerability details Resubmission as the form crashed apologies if this is a duplicate Impact Impermanent loss protection can be exploited to drain the reserve. Proof of Concept In VaderPoolV2.burn we calculate the current losses that the LP has made to impermanent los...

Wrong implementation of performanceFee can cause users to lose 50% to 100% of their funds

Handle WatchPug Vulnerability details A certain amount of lp tokens shares of the vault will be minted to the strategyPerformanceTreasury as performanceFee, the amount is calculated based on the minLpPriceFactor. However, the current formula for toMint is wrong, which issues more than 100% of the...

Users can avoid paying vault fees

Handle cmichel Vulnerability details The LPIssuer.deposit/withdraw function charges protocol&management&performance fees through inflating the LP supply in the chargeFees function. However, this LP fees minting is skipped if the elapsed time is less than the managementFeeChargeDelay: if elapsed...