No validation for the partyFactory contract !

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Malicious party contract can be deployed ! Proof of Concept Party contracts are created by the proxyFactory contract . In the initialize function , the proxyFactory contract address is provided by the user which may bring catastrophic consequences . This...

Potential drain of EthCrowdFund contract

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact In the emergencyExecute function in the EthCrowdFundBase contract, the external call msg.value is decided by the user input which could lead to draining of funds by compromised wallet or human error. Also there is no check if the value of amoutnEth is at...

members can get less funds out than they should have in a rageQuit

Lines of code Vulnerability details Vulnerability details: Details: the function getVotingPowerShareOf in PartyGovernanceNft get's the voting power share of a tokenId and it does that by dividing the voting power that nft has by the totalVotingPower: function getVotingPowerShareOfuint256 tokenId...

Increasing of totalVotingPower during crowdfund can lead to users losing funds.

Lines of code Vulnerability details Bug Description The recent code update allows authorities to be declared at the start of the crowdfunding phase. This change allows authority-restricted functions to be called during the crowdfunding phase by the authorities added in the party constructor...

funds stuck in crowdfund

Lines of code Vulnerability details Vulnerability details: Details: in ETHCrowdfundBase the crowdfund deployer can choose to implement fee's that are given to a feeAdress with a certain percentage of the crowdfund ETH. the fee splitting is happening both in finalize: function finalizeuint96...

Users can lose eth when contributing.

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact When contributing in InitialETHCrowdfund, if minting adjusts the voting power for that user to cap it at totalVotingPower, the user does not get refunded the eth he lost. Proof of Concept PartyGovernanceNFTmint caps the mintedVotingPower at...

Users of ReraiseCrowdfund will potentially not receive appropriate voting power

Lines of code Vulnerability details Bug Description The recent code update introduces the functionality for authorities to reduce the total voting power by invoking the decreaseTotalVotingPower function of the party. However, this functionality can lead to issues when used in the time frame after...

No token whitelist leaves rageQuit() vulnerable to malicious ERC20 token contracts

Lines of code Vulnerability details A malicious actor can exploit the PartyGovernanceNFT.sol::rageQuit function by specifying a malicious IERC20 contract in the withdrawTokens array. The malicious contract could "donate" tokens to the proxy contract to pass the balance check here and when the...

interest is still accuring when the market is paused, force user to incur debts

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact interest is still accuring when the market is paused, force user to incur debts Proof of Concept when the function accure is called the interest is accured after the interest rate is calculated uint256 interestRate = IIRMirm.getInterestRateaddressthis,...

replay exploitation in StakedUSDeV2's unstake function

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The vulnerability in the unstake function of the StakedUSDeV2 contract allows the receiver to claim assets without considering the specific round from which they should receive the assets. The receiver can claim assets from a different round than intende...

removeDelegatedSigner() will not undelegate address for signing.

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Impact is critical as delegator addresses will still retain delegator roll even after the removeDelegatedSigner is called by user. Proof of Concept function setDelegatedSigner is used to set delegation function setDelegatedSigneraddress delegateTo extern...

TRANSFERING FUNDS TO YOURSELF INCREASES YOUR BALANCE

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact If transferred to yourself, it will cause your balance to increase, thus growing the token balance infinitely. Proof of Concept File: src/market/WildcatMarketToken.sol 54: transferfrom, to, amount; 74: accountsfrom = fromAccount; 78: accountsto =...

Deploying a market with a non-ERC20 asset can cause incorrect interaction with asset

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The market contract may expect certain ERC20 functions to be present and behave in a specific way. If the asset contract does not adhere to the ERC20 standard, the market may behave unexpectedly, resulting in incorrect token balances, pricing, or other...

Sanctionned funds keep earning APR, and protocol earning fees on these funds

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact When a user is sanctioned, if he has a scaledBalance not in the withdrawal queue, calling the nukeFromOrbit function will send sanctioned funds to an escrow contract, and these funds will keep earning APR. This is because when a deposit is executed, the...

Malicious initial reserve ratio can be used to rug lenders collateral

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Wildcat protocol provides borrowers the ability to adjust annual interest BIPs after market deployment. In order to protect lenders the protocol increases the reserve ratio of ratio of the market to 90% for two weeks. The increased reserve ratio allows...

disallowing the executor to sign the transaction with the expiryEpoch will may allow or prevent the transaction to be executed in a wrong time for the executor, who is the responsible for performing the strategies, and will hamper the automation process

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact preventing the executor from setting an ExpiryEpoch to the transaction to be executed within it , will lead to hamper the automation process and may allow the transactions to be executed in improper time in which the strategy became invalid which may cau...

New Clues Suggest Stolen FTX Funds Went to Russia-Linked Money Launderers

Whoever looted FTX on the day of its bankruptcy has now moved the stolen money through a long string of intermediaries—and eventually some that look Russian in origin...

token.transferFrom signaling failure by returning false may allow for funds to be stolen

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact ERC20MultiDelegate is expected to work with any ERC20-compliant tokens as long as they provide the same functionality and interface as ERC20Votes from OpenZeppelin. This makes it possible for ERC20MultiDelegate to work with a token that signals...

Loss of tokens because target address can be set to zero

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Due to the possibility of target addresses being zero, tokens transferred to zero address will be lost forever, leading to loss of funds for the users of the protocol and that tokens being out of circulation forever burned. Proof of Concept Users can...

Possibility of losing users funds due to not checking for zero address (address 0x0)

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact As there is no function for checking whether the addresses of the sources and targets are zero or not in the delegateMulti function it may cause issues for users Sending tokens to a zero address address 0x0 is generally not a recommended practice in...