Lucene search
+L

56 matches found

Github Security Blog
Github Security Blog
•added 2026/09/23 9:24 p.m.•20 views

Klever-Go: Zombie-order theft: `Buy` missing `IsClaimed` guard in native marketplace

Location: core/kapp/market/market.go — Buy approx. L281–436\ Severity: High The native marketplace enforces an IsClaimed guard in Claim market.go:752, CancelOrder market.go:1125, and orderEscrowAmount market.go:251, but not in Buy. Marketplace escrow is virtual: the market KApp account never...

7.1CVSS5.8AI score0.00341EPSS
SaveExploits0References5Affected Software1
OSV
OSV
•added 2026/08/13 5:54 p.m.•14 views

CVE-2026-73645 OpenZeppelin Confidential Contracts ERC7984ERC20Wrapper: once a wrapper is filled, subsequent wrap requests do not revert and result in loss of funds.

OpenZeppelin Confidential Contracts is an experimental library for developing applications on the Zama fhEVM. Prior to 0.3.1, the ERC7984 contract tracked confidential total supply with an euint64 value, and an overflowing internal mint operation could fail silently. The wrap and onTransferReceiv...

8.7CVSS5.4AI score
SaveExploits0References6
Cvelist
Cvelist
•added 2026/08/13 5:54 p.m.•38 views

CVE-2026-73645 OpenZeppelin Confidential Contracts ERC7984ERC20Wrapper: once a wrapper is filled, subsequent wrap requests do not revert and result in loss of funds.

OpenZeppelin Confidential Contracts is an experimental library for developing applications on the Zama fhEVM. Prior to 0.3.1, the ERC7984 contract tracked confidential total supply with an euint64 value, and an overflowing internal mint operation could fail silently. The wrap and onTransferReceiv...

8.7CVSS0.00524EPSS
SaveExploits0References4
EUVD
EUVD
•added 2026/08/13 5:54 p.m.•27 views

EUVD-2026-58188

OpenZeppelin Confidential Contracts is an experimental library for developing applications on the Zama fhEVM. Prior to 0.3.1, the ERC7984 contract tracked confidential total supply with an euint64 value, and an overflowing internal mint operation could fail silently. The wrap and onTransferReceiv...

8.7CVSS5.3AI score0.00524EPSS
SaveExploits0References4
PyPA
PyPA
•added 2026/07/07 2:34 p.m.•26 views

LNbits improperly handles potential network and payment failures when using Eclair backend

SummaryPaying invoices in Eclair that do not get settled within the internal timeout about 30s lead to a payment being considered failed, even though it may still be in flight. DetailsUsing blocking: true on the API call will lead to a timeout error if a payment does not get settled in the 30s...

8.1CVSS6AI score0.00602EPSS
SaveExploits0References5Affected Software1
OSV
OSV
•added 2026/07/07 2:34 p.m.•25 views

PYSEC-2026-1580 LNbits improperly handles potential network and payment failures when using Eclair backend

Summary Paying invoices in Eclair that do not get settled within the internal timeout about 30s lead to a payment being considered failed, even though it may still be in flight. Details Using blocking: true on the API call will lead to a timeout error if a payment does not get settled in the 30s...

8.1CVSS7.1AI score0.00602EPSS
SaveExploits0References5
RedhatCVE
RedhatCVE
•added 2026/01/09 11:35 a.m.•18 views

CVE-2021-41591

ACINQ Eclair before 0.6.3 allows loss of funds because of dust HTLC exposure...

9.4CVSS8.1AI score0.01705EPSS
SaveExploits1References1
Snyk
Snyk
•added 2026/01/05 7:57 p.m.•8 views

Integer Overflow or Wraparound

Overview @openzeppelin/confidential-contracts is a Smart Contract library for use with confidential coprocessors Affected versions of this package are vulnerable to Integer Overflow or Wraparound in the wrap and onTransferReceived functions used by the ERC7984 contract. An attacker can cause user...

8.2CVSS7AI score
SaveExploits0References2
Github Security Blog
Github Security Blog
•added 2026/01/05 7:57 p.m.•23 views

ERC7984ERC20Wrapper: once a wrapper is filled, subsequent wrap requests do not revert and result in loss of funds.

Impact The ERC7984 contract tracks total supply using a confidential euint64 value. If a call to the internal mint function would result in the total supply overflowing, the call fails silently. The wrap and onTransferReceived functions in ERC7984ERC20Wrapper assume that mint won't fail silently...

8.7CVSS5.7AI score0.00524EPSS
SaveExploits0References2Affected Software1
EUVD
EUVD
•added 2025/10/03 8:07 p.m.•16 views

EUVD-2024-0614

Malicious code in bioql PyPI...

9.1CVSS9AI score0.00882EPSS
SaveExploits1References6
RedhatCVE
RedhatCVE
•added 2025/02/05 5:34 a.m.•13 views

CVE-2024-1631

Impact: The library offers a function to generate an ed25519 key pair via Ed25519KeyIdentity.generate with an optional param to provide a 32 byte seed value, which will then be used as the secret key. When no seed value is provided, it is expected that the library generates the secret key using...

9.1CVSS6.8AI score0.00882EPSS
SaveExploits1References1
NVD
NVD
•added 2024/08/15 9:15 p.m.•36 views

CVE-2024-43366

zkvyper is a Vyper compiler. Starting in version 1.3.12 and prior to version 1.5.3, since LLL IR has no Turing-incompletness restrictions, it is compiled to a loop with a much more late exit condition. It leads to a loss of funds or other unwanted behavior if the loop body contains it. However,...

9.1CVSS0.00511EPSS
SaveExploits1References1
Vulnrichment
Vulnrichment
•added 2024/06/14 2:31 p.m.•22 views

CVE-2024-34694 LNbits improperly handles potential network and payment failures when using Eclair backend

LNbits is a Lightning wallet and accounts system. Paying invoices in Eclair that do not get settled within the internal timeout about 30s lead to a payment being considered failed, even though it may still be in flight. This vulnerability can lead to a total loss of funds for the node backend. Th...

8.1CVSS6.7AI score0.00602EPSS
SaveExploits0References1
OSV
OSV
•added 2024/06/14 2:31 p.m.•14 views

CVE-2024-34694 LNbits improperly handles potential network and payment failures when using Eclair backend

LNbits is a Lightning wallet and accounts system. Paying invoices in Eclair that do not get settled within the internal timeout about 30s lead to a payment being considered failed, even though it may still be in flight. This vulnerability can lead to a total loss of funds for the node backend. Th...

8.1CVSS6.8AI score
SaveExploits0References3
Positive Technologies
Positive Technologies
•added 2024/05/04 12:00 a.m.•20 views

PT-2024-25929 · Btcd · Btcd

Name of the Vulnerable Software and Affected Versions: btcd versions prior to 0.24.0 Description: The issue arises from an incorrect implementation of the consensus rules outlined in BIP 68 and BIP 112, making btcd susceptible to consensus failures. Specifically, it uses the transaction version a...

7.5CVSS7.2AI score0.00558EPSS
SaveExploits0References16
OSV
OSV
•added 2024/02/21 2:54 a.m.•76 views

GHSA-C9VV-FHGV-CJC3 agent-js: Insecure Key Generation in `Ed25519KeyIdentity.generate`

Impact The library offers a function to generate an ed25519 key pair via Ed25519KeyIdentity.generate with an optional param to provide a 32 byte seed value, which will then be used as the secret key. When no seed value is provided, it is expected that the library generates the secret key using...

9.1CVSS9.2AI score0.00882EPSS
SaveExploits1References6
OSV
OSV
•added 2024/02/21 2:12 a.m.•11 views

CVE-2024-1631 agent-js: Insecure Key Generation in `Ed25519KeyIdentity.generate`

Impact: The library offers a function to generate an ed25519 key pair via Ed25519KeyIdentity.generate with an optional param to provide a 32 byte seed value, which will then be used as the secret key. When no seed value is provided, it is expected that the library generates the secret key using...

9.1CVSS7.2AI score
SaveExploits0References7
Code423n4
Code423n4
•added 2023/09/27 12:00 a.m.•26 views

Missing slippage control while depositing rewards in SafEth and VotiumStrategy

Lines of code Vulnerability details Summary Deposits to SafEth and VotiumStrategy coming from rewards lack slippage control, making them susceptible to sandwich attacks by MEV bots, which can result in a loss of funds for the protocol. Impact Rewards coming from the VotiumStrategy contract are...

6.9AI score
SaveExploits0
Code423n4
Code423n4
•added 2023/09/07 12:00 a.m.•29 views

Low level calls to accounts with no code will succeed in multiexcall function

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Low level calls behave differently than function calls in Solidity. Calls at the EVM level to accounts with no code are successful, this is the expected and normal behavior. It is Solidity that adds checks to prevent accidental calls to accounts with no...

7.2AI score
SaveExploits0
Code423n4
Code423n4
•added 2023/08/07 12:00 a.m.•22 views

cleanup() does not properly handle debt repayment

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The cleanup... function in the PositionManager.sol contract is used to deposit remaining users assets back to ROE, repaying debt if any. However the users debt will not be repaid if the user has debt leading to loss of funds for the lenders and the proje...

6.7AI score
SaveExploits0
Rows per page
Query Builder