Lucene search
+L

3 matches found

Code423n4
Code423n4
•added 2022/11/28 12:0 a.m.•12 views

There is no re-register o re-assign function

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact There is no re-register or re-assign option for the smart contracts. Let's assume a smart contract is registered either through the register function with a new NFT minted or the assign function to an existing NFT. However, if somehow, the NFT is burned ...

6.8AI score
Exploits0
Code423n4
Code423n4
•added 2022/11/28 12:0 a.m.•16 views

fee loss in AutoPxGmx and AutoPxGlp and reward loss in AutoPxGlp by calling PirexRewards.claim(pxGmx/pxGpl, AutoPx*) directly which transfers rewards to AutoPx* pool without compound logic get executed and fee calculation logic and pxGmx wouldn't be executed for those rewards

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Function compound in AutoPxGmx and AutoPxGlp contracts is for compounding pxGLP and additionally pxGMX rewards. it works by calling PirexGmx.claimpx, this to collect the rewards of the vault and then swap the received amount to calculate the reward,...

6.8AI score
Exploits0
Code423n4
Code423n4
•added 2022/03/16 12:0 a.m.•11 views

[WP-H8] Wrong formula for the fee to be added to the incentivePool

Lines of code Vulnerability details The protocol takes part of the fees to incentivize liquidity, which is recorded as incentivePooltokenAddress on LiquidityPool.sol. However, the formula used to calculate the updated amount of incentivePooltokenAddress in the current implementation is wrong...

6.7AI score
Exploits0
Rows per page
Query Builder