CVE-2025-59324

CPSD CryptoPro Secure Disk for Bitlocker before v7.7.4 fails to properly validate LUKS encryption and, if encryption is present, all CryptoPro file integrity checks are skipped...

CVE-2025-59321: Initialization of a Resource with an Insecure Default

CPSD CryptoPro Secure Disk for Bitlocker before v7.7.4 contains a default TPM PCR policy that fails to consider the system boot state. This allows the TPM to be unsealed via an unintended execution path or from another hardware platform...

CVE-2025-10010

The CPSD CryptoPro Secure Disk application boots a small Linux operating system to perform user authentication before using BitLocker to decrypt the Windows partition. The system is located on a separate unencrypted partition which can be reached by anyone with access to the hard disk. Multiple...

CVE-2025-10010

The CPSD CryptoPro Secure Disk application boots a small Linux operating system to perform user authentication before using BitLocker to decrypt the Windows partition. The system is located on a separate unencrypted partition which can be reached by anyone with access to the hard disk. Multiple...

CVE-2025-10010 Integrity Validation Bypass in CryptoPro Secure Disk for BitLocker

The CPSD CryptoPro Secure Disk application boots a small Linux operating system to perform user authentication before using BitLocker to decrypt the Windows partition. The system is located on a separate unencrypted partition which can be reached by anyone with access to the hard disk. Multiple...

EUVD-2025-208086

The CPSD CryptoPro Secure Disk application boots a small Linux operating system to perform user authentication before using BitLocker to decrypt the Windows partition. The system is located on a separate unencrypted partition which can be reached by anyone with access to the hard disk. Multiple...

CVE-2025-10010

The CPSD CryptoPro Secure Disk application boots a small Linux operating system to perform user authentication before using BitLocker to decrypt the Windows partition. The system is located on a separate unencrypted partition which can be reached by anyone with access to the hard disk. Multiple...

CVE-2025-10010 Integrity Validation Bypass in CryptoPro Secure Disk for BitLocker

The CPSD CryptoPro Secure Disk application boots a small Linux operating system to perform user authentication before using BitLocker to decrypt the Windows partition. The system is located on a separate unencrypted partition which can be reached by anyone with access to the hard disk. Multiple...

PT-2026-21741

Name of the Vulnerable Software and Affected Versions CPSD CryptoPro Secure Disk affected versions not specified Description The CPSD CryptoPro Secure Disk application utilizes a small Linux operating system for user authentication prior to BitLocker decryption of the Windows partition. The Linux...

CVE-2025-10010: Missing Support for Integrity Check

The CPSD CryptoPro Secure Disk application boots a small Linux operating system to perform user authentication before using BitLocker to decrypt the Windows partition. The system is located on a separate unencrypted partition which can be reached by anyone with access to the hard disk. Multiple...

CPSD CryptoPro Secure Disk 安全漏洞

CPSD CryptoPro Secure Disk is a transparent disk encryption software developed by CPSD. There is a security vulnerability in CPSD CryptoPro Secure Disk. This vulnerability stems from the fact that configuration files in the Linux operating system’s integrity checks are not verified through the...

EUVD-2022-37258

Malicious code in bioql PyPI...

Linux Distros Unpatched Vulnerability : CVE-2022-34301

The Linux/Unix host has one or more packages installed that are impacted by a vulnerability without a vendor supplied patch available. - A flaw was found in CryptoPro Secure Disk bootloaders before 2022-06-01. An attacker may use this bootloader to bypass or tamper with Secure Boot protections. I...

Oracle Linux 9 : fwupd (ELSA-2023-2487)

The remote Oracle Linux 9 host has packages installed that are affected by multiple vulnerabilities as referenced in the ELSA-2023-2487 advisory. 1.8.10-2.0.1 - Drop pesign.service restart in postun Orabug: 34760075 - Update signing certificate JIRA: OLDIS-16371 - Rebuild for SecureBoot signature...

shim: 3rd party shim allow secure boot bypass

A flaw was found in CryptoPro Secure Disk bootloaders before 2022-06-01. An attacker may use this bootloader to bypass or tamper with Secure Boot protections. In order to load and execute arbitrary code in the pre-boot stage, an attacker simply needs to replace the existing signed bootloader...

CVE-2022-34301

A flaw was found in CryptoPro Secure Disk bootloaders before 2022-06-01. An attacker may use this bootloader to bypass or tamper with Secure Boot protections. In order to load and execute arbitrary code in the pre-boot stage, an attacker simply needs to replace the existing signed bootloader...

Input validation

A flaw was found in CryptoPro Secure Disk bootloaders before 2022-06-01. An attacker may use this bootloader to bypass or tamper with Secure Boot protections. In order to load and execute arbitrary code in the pre-boot stage, an attacker simply needs to replace the existing signed bootloader...

CVE-2022-34301

A flaw was found in CryptoPro Secure Disk bootloaders before 2022-06-01. An attacker may use this bootloader to bypass or tamper with Secure Boot protections. In order to load and execute arbitrary code in the pre-boot stage, an attacker simply needs to replace the existing signed bootloader...

CVE-2022-34301: Undefined Security Weakness

A flaw was found in CryptoPro Secure Disk bootloaders before 2022-06-01. An attacker may use this bootloader to bypass or tamper with Secure Boot protections. In order to load and execute arbitrary code in the pre-boot stage, an attacker simply needs to replace the existing signed bootloader...

CVE-2022-34301

A flaw was found in CryptoPro Secure Disk bootloaders before 2022-06-01. An attacker may use this bootloader to bypass or tamper with Secure Boot protections. In order to load and execute arbitrary code in the pre-boot stage, an attacker simply needs to replace the existing signed bootloader...