CVE-2018-13513

CVE-2018-13513 concerns Ubiou’s Ethereum token smart contract where the mintToken function contains an integer overflow, allowing the contract owner to set any user’s balance to an arbitrary value. The issue is described consistently across sources (CNVD-2018-13186, NVD/CVE-2018-13513, CNVD varia...

CVE-2018-13479

The CVE-2018-13479 entry concerns a mintToken integer overflow in a SlidebitsToken smart contract (Ethereum). The mintToken function is reported to allow the contract owner to set any user balance to an arbitrary value, indicating an overflow condition in balance handling. Public references in NV...

CVE-2018-13617

The CVE-2018-13617 issue affects CAPTOZ, an Ethereum token: the mintToken function in its smart contract permits an integer overflow that allows the contract owner to set any user’s balance to an arbitrary value. This is documented in the NVD entry describing the overflow and the owner-controlled...

CVE-2018-13668

The CVE concerns the mintToken function of a BTPCoin Ethereum token smart contract, where an integer overflow allows the contract owner to set any user’s balance to an arbitrary value. Root cause: integer overflow in mintToken. Impact is described as enabling balance manipulation by the owner, wi...

CVE-2018-13602

The CVE-2018-13602 entry concerns a vulnerability in MiningToken’s smart contract. The mint function contains an integer overflow that allows the contract owner to set any user’s balance to an arbitrary value. Concrete details provided identify the affected component as the mint function of Minin...

CVE-2018-13732

The CVE-2018-13732 entry concerns the mintToken function of a smart contract implementing RiptideCoin (RIPT). The vulnerability is an integer overflow that lets the contract owner set an arbitrary user’s balance to any value. This is described in the NVD entry and linked references (e.g., BlockCh...

CVE-2018-13745

The CVE-2018-13745 entry applies to STCToken’s smart contract. The mintToken function contains an integer overflow that permits the contract owner to set any user’s balance to an arbitrary value, effectively enabling balance manipulation within the token. Sources across connected documents (CNVD-...

CVE-2018-13485

CVE-2018-13485 : The MintToken function of the BitcoinAgileToken Ethereum smart contract has an integer overflow that enables the contract owner to set any user’s balance to an arbitrary value. This vulnerability is described in multiple sources (NVD entry and CVE records) and is confirmed by ass...

CVE-2018-13488

The CVE-2018-13488 issue affects the Crypto Alley Shares (CAST) Ethereum token. The mintToken function in CAST’s smart contract contains an integer overflow that allows the contract owner to set any user’s balance to an arbitrary value. This is the underlying cause and it implies potential unauth...

CVE-2018-13606

The CVE-2018-13606 entry describes an integer overflow in the mintToken function of ARChain’s Ethereum token smart contract, enabling the contract owner to set an arbitrary user’s balance to any value. The vulnerability affects ARChain’s token implementation (smart contract level) and is caused b...

CVE-2018-13774

CVE-2018-13774 concerns a vulnerability in a Bitstarti Ethereum token smart contract. The issue is an integer overflow in the contract’s mintToken function, which could allow the contract owner to set an arbitrary user’s balance to any value. The affected component is the mintToken logic within t...

CVE-2018-13494

CVE-2018-13494 affects the SusanTokenERC20 Ethereum token. The vulnerability resides in the mintToken function of the smart contract implementation, described as an integer overflow that permits the contract owner to arbitrarily set any user’s balance. The connected documents confirm this as the ...

CVE-2018-13718

CVE-2018-13718 concerns the FuturXe Ethereum token where the mintToken function has an integer overflow that lets the contract owner set an arbitrary user’s balance. This is a developer-facing vulnerability in the smart contract implementation, with the root cause described as an integer overflow...

CVE-2018-13756

The CVE-2018-13756 entry concerns a vulnerability in the mintToken function of a CherryCoinFoundation Ethereum token implementation. The root cause is an integer overflow in mintToken, which can allow the contract owner to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value. The available documents...

CVE-2018-13594

The CVE-2018-13594 entry concerns the CardFactory Ethereum token. The mintToken function in its smart contract has an integer overflow, enabling the contract owner to set any user’s balance to an arbitrary value. This is the stated root cause and impact: arbitrary balance modification by the owne...

CVE-2018-13478

The CVE-2018-13478 entry concerns the mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for DMPToken (an Ethereum token) that contains an integer overflow. This overflow allows the contract owner to set any user’s balance to an arbitrary value. The attached connected documents corroborate thi...

CVE-2018-13551

The CVE-2018-13551 entry concerns the Bgamecoin smart contract (ERC20-like token). The connected documents describe a vulnerability in the mintToken function where an integer overflow permits the contract owner to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value. This is the explicit root cause ...

CVE-2018-13541

The CVE-2018-13541 issue targets CryptoLeu’s Ethereum token smart contract. A concrete integer overflow in the mintToken function allows the contract owner to set an arbitrary user’s balance to any value, indicating a control over token balances beyond intended logic. Affected component: the mint...

CVE-2018-13775

The CVE concerns the mintToken function in the RCKT_Coin Ethereum token smart contract. An integer overflow in mintToken could allow the contract owner to set any user’s balance to an arbitrary value, enabling arbitrary credit manipulation. The available sources confirm the vulnerability’s presen...

CVE-2018-13536

The CVE-2018-13536 entry concerns ERC20_ICO: mintToken in the smart contract exhibits an integer overflow. This weakness allows the contract owner to arbitrarily set any user’s balance. Affected component: mintToken in the ERC20_ICO contract. Root cause: integer overflow in the balance assignment...