CVE-2018-13750

The CVE-2018-13750 entry concerns the RichiumToken Ethereum token. The connected documents confirm a concrete issue in the mintToken function: an integer overflow in the contract’s mintToken logic that enables the contract owner to set an arbitrary user’s balance to any value. This establishes a ...

CVE-2018-13670

The CVE-2018-13670 entry concerns a vulnerability in a smart contract implementation for GFCB, an Ethereum token. The issue is described as an integer overflow in the mintToken function that enables the contract owner to set an arbitrary user’s balance to any value, effectively allowing balance m...

CVE-2018-13747

The CVE-2018-13747 entry applies to VanMinhCoin’s smart-contract mintToken function, where an integer overflow allows the contract owner to set any user’s balance to an arbitrary value. Multiple connected sources (NVD, CNVD, CVE lists) corroborate this vulnerability in the VanMinhCoin ERC20 imple...

CVE-2018-13521

The CVE-2018-13521 entry concerns PinkyToken, an Ethereum token, where the mintToken function has an integer overflow that allows the contract owner to set any user’s balance to an arbitrary value. This is described across multiple sources (CNVD/CNVD-2018-13091, NVD, CVE lists) as a vulnerability...

CVE-2018-13480

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for QRG, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value...

CVE-2018-13654

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for ESTSToken, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value...

CVE-2018-13719

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for BiteduToken, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value...

CVE-2018-13598

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for SendMe, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value...

CVE-2018-13658

CVE-2018-13658 : The issue affects a smart contract implementation for TheGoDgital, an Ethereum token, where the minted mintToken function contains an integer overflow. This overflow enables the contract owner to arbitrarily set any user’s balance. From the provided sources, this vulnerability is...

CVE-2018-13539

The CVE-2018-13539 issue affects the Bcxss Ethereum token. The vulnerability is an overflow in the contract’s mintToken function that lets the contract owner set any user’s balance to an arbitrary value. The root cause is an integer overflow in mintToken, enabling balance manipulation. Public det...

CVE-2018-13655

CVE-2018-13655 concerns the mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for the GFC Ethereum token. The underlying issue is an integer overflow in mintToken, which allows the contract owner to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value. The available connected documents confirm t...

CVE-2018-13630

The CVE-2018-13630 entry concerns the DoccoinPreICO Ethereum token. The MintToken function in the contract has an integer overflow that enables the contract owner to set any user’s balance to an arbitrary value. This describes a root cause in the smart contract logic (integer overflow) that direc...

CVE-2018-13620

CVE-2018-13620 affects TripCash’s Ethereum token smart contract. The mintToken function has an integer overflow that lets the contract owner set any user’s balance to an arbitrary value. This is the stated vulnerability and impact; no exploitation details or mitigations are provided in the suppli...

CVE-2018-13700

The CVE-2018-13700 issue affects IPMCoin—an Ethereum token—where the mintToken function of its smart contract contains an integer overflow. This vulnerability enables the contract owner to set any user’s balance to an arbitrary value. Documented in multiple sources (NVD/NVD entry for CVE-2018-137...

CVE-2018-13544

The CVE-2018-13544 entry concerns a mintToken integer overflow in Numisma’s Ethereum token smart contract. The vulnerability allows the contract owner to set an arbitrary user’s balance to any value, indicating a storage/balance manipulation vulnerability in the token mintToken function. The affe...

CVE-2018-13690

The CVE-2018-13690 entry concerns the mintToken function of a smart contract for Instacocoa (Ethereum token) that contains an integer overflow. This overflow enables the contract owner to set any user’s balance to an arbitrary value, representing a high-severity impact on token balances as descri...

CVE-2018-13737

The CVE-2018-13737 entry concerns the mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for the AnovaBace Ethereum token. It describes an integer overflow that allows the contract owner to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value. Details indicate the vulnerability resides in mintTok...

CVE-2018-13513

CVE-2018-13513 concerns Ubiou’s Ethereum token smart contract where the mintToken function contains an integer overflow, allowing the contract owner to set any user’s balance to an arbitrary value. The issue is described consistently across sources (CNVD-2018-13186, NVD/CVE-2018-13513, CNVD varia...

CVE-2018-13479

The CVE-2018-13479 entry concerns a mintToken integer overflow in a SlidebitsToken smart contract (Ethereum). The mintToken function is reported to allow the contract owner to set any user balance to an arbitrary value, indicating an overflow condition in balance handling. Public references in NV...

CVE-2018-13617

The CVE-2018-13617 issue affects CAPTOZ, an Ethereum token: the mintToken function in its smart contract permits an integer overflow that allows the contract owner to set any user’s balance to an arbitrary value. This is documented in the NVD entry describing the overflow and the owner-controlled...