6139 matches found
CVE-2018-13555
CVE-2018-13555 concerns a JaxBox smart contract where the mintToken function has an integer overflow, allowing the contract owner to set any user’s balance to an arbitrary value. This is documented across multiple sources (NVD/CNVD/PRION) as a token balance manipulation vulnerability in the mintT...
CVE-2018-13556
The CVE-2018-13556 issue affects COSMOTokenERC20, an Ethereum token, where the mintToken function contains an integer overflow. This vulnerability allows the contract owner to set any user’s balance to an arbitrary value, enabling potential unilateral balance manipulation. The available sources c...
CVE-2018-13560
CVE-2018-13560 affects a smart contract implementation for KelvinToken (Ethereum). The issue is in the mintToken function, where an integer overflow can allow the contract owner to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value. The connected documents confirm the vulnerable component is the m...
CVE-2018-13570
Summary: CVE-2018-13570 concerns the mint function of a smart contract for kkTestCoin1 (KTC1). The underlying issue is an integer overflow in the mint function, which enables the contract owner to set an arbitrary user’s balance to any value. Affected component: kkTestCoin1 token smart contract (...
CVE-2018-13572
The CVE-2018-13572 entry concerns the mintToken function of a PGM_Coin Ethereum token smart contract, where an integer overflow enables the contract owner to set any user’s balance to an arbitrary value. Root cause described as an overflow in balance handling within mintToken. Documented impact i...
CVE-2018-13574
The CVE concerns DataShieldCoin, an Ethereum token. The mintToken function in its smart contract has an integer overflow vulnerability that enables the contract owner to set any user’s balance to an arbitrary value. This underlying issue is described in the CVE entry and linked references, with t...
CVE-2018-13581
The CVE-2018-13581 issue is an integer overflow in the mintToken function of TravelCoin (TRV) smart contract. The overflow enables the contract owner to set the balance of any user to an arbitrary value, implying a control- or balance- manipulation vulnerability in the token implementation. Affec...
CVE-2018-13584
CVE-2018-13584 concerns a smart contract vulnerability in yasudem, an Ethereum token. The mintToken function contains an integer overflow that lets the contract owner set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value. The description and connected records confirm the affected component is the min...
CVE-2018-13586
CVE-2018-13586 affects Nectar (NCTR) token: the mintToken function in the smart contract has an integer overflow that allows the contract owner to set any user’s balance to an arbitrary value. This is documented in NVD/Nectar CVE entries. Exploitation status and concrete remediation steps are not...
CVE-2018-13588
CVE-2018-13588 concerns Code47 (C47), a Code47 Ethereum token smart contract. The mintToken function is reported to suffer an integer overflow that enables the contract owner to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value. The concrete impact described is balance manipulation by the owner, ...
CVE-2018-13591
CVE-2018-13591 concerns the mintToken function in a KAPcoin Ethereum smart contract. The root cause is an integer overflow in mintToken that lets the contract owner set any user’s balance to an arbitrary value. Affected component: the KAPcoin token contract; impact: owner-controlled balance manip...
CVE-2018-13597
The CVE-2018-13597 entry concerns a Vulnerability in a smart contract's mintToken function for a testcoin Ethereum token. The issue is an integer overflow that enables the contract owner to set an arbitrary user’s balance to any value, representing a critical control of token balances. The availa...
CVE-2018-13598
CVE-2018-13598 affects the SendMe Ethereum token smart contract. The mintToken function contains an integer overflow that allows the contract owner to set any user’s balance to an arbitrary value. This is the stated vulnerability and impact in the CVE description, with no publicly provided exploi...
CVE-2018-13600
The CVE pertains to AMToken’s mintToken function, where an integer overflow enables the contract owner to set any user’s balance to an arbitrary value. This is the documented root cause and impact. The accompanying sources describe the vulnerability but do not provide explicit exploitation detail...
CVE-2018-13604
CVE-2018-13604 concerns a mintToken function in a smart contract for the wellieat Ethereum token. The vulnerability is described as an integer overflow that enables the contract owner to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value. The primary sources (NVD entry and related records) confirm...
CVE-2018-13608
The CVE pertains to a smart contract for archercoin (Ethereum token). The mintToken function contains an integer overflow that enables the contract owner to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value. This is the core issue described in multiple sources (NVD/NVD details, PRION, CVE records...
CVE-2018-13612
CVE-2018-13612 concerns the mintToken function of Robincoin’s Ethereum smart contract. The vulnerability is an integer overflow that allows the contract owner to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value, enabling unauthorized balance manipulation by the owner. The available documents des...
CVE-2018-13625
The CVE-2018-13625 entry concerns the mintlvlToken function of a smart contract implementation for the Krown Ethereum token, where an integer overflow is reported to allow the contract owner to set any user’s balance to an arbitrary value. Concrete details across sources (NVD and related entries)...
CVE-2018-13629
CVE-2018-13629 concerns a vulnerability in the mintToken function of a CrimsonShilling Ethereum token smart contract. The issue is an integer overflow that allows the contract owner to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value, effectively enabling balance manipulation. Documents confirm ...
CVE-2018-13640
CVE-2018-13640 concerns the mintToken function of a smart-contract implementation for EthereumSmart, an Ethereum token. The issue is an integer overflow that allows the contract owner to set an arbitrary user’s balance to any value. The connected documents confirm the root cause as an overflow an...