6139 matches found
CVE-2018-13510
The CVE-2018-13510 entry describes an integer overflow in the mintToken function of a smart contract for Welfare Token Fund (WTF) on Ethereum. The overflow enables the contract owner to set any user balance to an arbitrary value, constituting a high-severity integrity risk as stated in the NVD en...
CVE-2018-13562
The CVE-2018-13562 entry concerns BMVCoin, an Ethereum token smart contract. The mintToken function has an integer overflow that enables the contract owner to set any user’s balance to an arbitrary value. This is the stated underlying vulnerability and impact in multiple sources (NVD entry, Prion...
CVE-2018-13692
The CVE-2018-13692 entry concerns MehdiTAZIToken, an Ethereum token, where the mintToken function has an integer overflow. This overflow allows the contract owner to set the balance of any arbitrary user to any value. The root cause is an overflow in mintToken; the available documents do not spec...
CVE-2018-13499
The CVE-2018-13499 entry concerns a vulnerability in a Crowdsale Ethereum token where the mintToken function is susceptible to an integer overflow. The underlying cause allows the contract owner to set an arbitrary user’s balance to any value, representing a direct control of token balances by th...
CVE-2018-13622
The CVE-2018-13622 entry describes an integer overflow in the mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for ObjectToken (OBJ), an Ethereum token. The overflow allows the contract owner to set an arbitrary user’s balance to any value, enabling potential manipulation of token balances. ...
CVE-2018-13546
The CVE-2018-13546 entry concerns CCASH, an Ethereum token. The mintToken function in its smart contract is reported to have an integer overflow that allows the contract owner to set any user’s balance to an arbitrary value. This is a direct control-flow/arithmetics flaw in the token contract, en...
CVE-2018-13691
CVE-2018-13691 describes an integer overflow in the mintToken function of the smart contract implementation for R Time Token v3 (RS) , specifically the contract named RTokenMain . This vulnerability allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value. The provide...
CVE-2018-13468
The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for Cavecoin, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value...
CVE-2018-13647
The CVE-2018-13647 entry concerns a vulnerability in a TrueGoldCoinToken smart contract. The affected component is the mintToken function of the token’s Ethereum implementation. The root cause is an integer overflow in mintToken, which enables the contract owner to set an arbitrary user’s balance...
CVE-2018-13607
The CVE-2018-13607 entry concerns ResidualShare, an Ethereum token whose smart contract contains an integer overflow in the mintToken function. This vulnerability allows the contract owner to assign any value to a user’s balance, enabling arbitrary credit manipulation within the token’s accountin...
CVE-2018-13580
The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for ProvidenceCasino PVE, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value...
CVE-2018-13690
The CVE-2018-13690 entry concerns the mintToken function of a smart contract for Instacocoa (Ethereum token) that contains an integer overflow. This overflow enables the contract owner to set any user’s balance to an arbitrary value, representing a high-severity impact on token balances as descri...
CVE-2018-13658
CVE-2018-13658 : The issue affects a smart contract implementation for TheGoDgital, an Ethereum token, where the minted mintToken function contains an integer overflow. This overflow enables the contract owner to arbitrarily set any user’s balance. From the provided sources, this vulnerability is...
CVE-2018-13638
The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for Bitpark, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value...
CVE-2018-13759
The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for BIGCAdvancedToken, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value...
CVE-2018-13547
The CVE-2018-13547 entry concerns Providence Casino Token (ProvidenceCasinoToken) on Ethereum, where the mintToken function contains an integer overflow that allows the contract owner to set any user’s balance to an arbitrary value. Public sources in connected documents (CNVD/CNVD-2020-22842 and ...
CVE-2018-13692
The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for MehdiTAZIToken, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value...
CVE-2018-13615
The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for MJCToken, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value...
CVE-2018-13569
The CVE-2018-13569 entry concerns HitToken, an Ethereum token whose smart contract mintToken has an integer overflow. This overflow enables the contract owner to set any user’s balance to an arbitrary value. The affected component is the mintToken function within HitToken’s contract; root cause i...
CVE-2018-13755
The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for OTAKUToken, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value...