Design/Logic Flaw

Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2013-1969. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2013-1969. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2013-1969 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent...

Design/Logic Flaw

Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2013-1664, CVE-2013-1665. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2013-1664 and/or CVE-2013-1665. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2013-1664 and/or CVE-2013-1665 instead of this candidate. All references and...

Design/Logic Flaw

Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2013-1664, CVE-2013-1665. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2013-1664 and/or CVE-2013-1665. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2013-1664 and/or CVE-2013-1665 instead of this candidate. All references and...

CVE-2013-0278

CVE-2013-0278 is a duplicate of CVE-2013-1664 and CVE-2013-1665 and is not the active entry to use. Connected documents provide concrete details: XML parsing flaws in Python XML libraries (used by OpenStack components such as Keystone, Nova, Cinder, Django, and related services) allow XML Entity ...

Design/Logic Flaw

Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2013-2617. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2013-2617. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2013-2617 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent...

Design/Logic Flaw

Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2013-2546, CVE-2013-2547, CVE-2013-2548. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2013-2546, CVE-2013-2547, and CVE-2013-2548. Notes: All CVE users should reference one or more of CVE-2013-2546, CVE-2013-2547, and CVE-2013-254...

Design/Logic Flaw

Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA at the suggestion of the CVE project team. The candidate had been associated with a correct report of a security problem, but not a problem that is categorized as a vulnerability...

CVE-2012-3801

CVE-2012-3801 is rejected/not used; it is a duplicate of CVE-2012-2704 and not an active vulnerability entry.

CVE-2006-7249

Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2006-7250, CVE-2012-1410. Reason: this candidate was intended for one issue, but CVE users may have associated it with multiple unrelated issues. Notes: All CVE users should consult CVE-2006-7250 for the OpenSSL candidate or...

Design/Logic Flaw

Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2010-4670, CVE-2010-4671. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2010-4670 and CVE-2010-4671. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2010-4670 and/or CVE-2010-4671 instead of this candidate. All references and description...

CVE-2011-1501

CVE-2011-1501 is rejected/not used; refer to CVE-2011-1571.

Design/Logic Flaw

Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-1685. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-1685. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-1685 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent...

Design/Logic Flaw

Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2010-4150. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2010-4150. A typo caused the wrong ID to be used. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2010-4150 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this...

Design/Logic Flaw

Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2010-4207, CVE-2010-4208, CVE-2010-4209. Reason: This candidate originally combined three issues that affected different versions. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2010-4207, CVE-2010-4208, or CVE-2010-4209 instead of thi...

Design/Logic Flaw

Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2010-4008. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2010-4008. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2010-4008 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent...

Design/Logic Flaw

Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2010-1823. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2010-1823. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2010-1823 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent...

Design/Logic Flaw

Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2010-2803. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2010-2803. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2010-2803 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to...

Design/Logic Flaw

Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2010-1797. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2010-1797. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2010-1797 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent...

Design/Logic Flaw

Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2010-0092. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2010-0092. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2010-0092 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent...

Design/Logic Flaw

Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2010-1640. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2010-1640. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2010-1640 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent...