Design/Logic Flaw

Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2016-5388. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2016-5388. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2016-5388 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent...

CVE-2016-0924

Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2004-2761. Reason: This candidate is subsumed by CVE-2004-2761. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2004-2761 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accident...

Design/Logic Flaw

Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2004-2761. Reason: This candidate is subsumed by CVE-2004-2761. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2004-2761 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accident...

Design/Logic Flaw

Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2016-5333. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2016-5333. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2016-5333 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to...

Design/Logic Flaw

Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2016-4993. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2016-4993. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2016-4993 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to...

Design/Logic Flaw

Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2016-5696. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2016-5696. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2016-5696 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to...

CVE-2016-3794

Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2016-3814. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2016-3814. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2016-3814 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to...

Design/Logic Flaw

Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2016-4477. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2016-4477. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2016-4477 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to...

Design/Logic Flaw

Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2014-8496. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2014-8496. A typo caused the wrong ID to be used. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2014-8496 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this...

CVE-2015-4829

Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2016-0638. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2016-0638. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2016-0638 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to...

Design/Logic Flaw

Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2015-6479. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2015-6479. A typo caused the wrong ID to be used. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2015-6479 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this...

CVE-2015-6264

CVE-2015-6264 is a reserved duplicate of CVE-2016-1349. Connected sources confirm a Cisco Smart Install client DoS in Cisco IOS 12.2/15.0/15.2 and IOS XE 3.2–3.7, exploitable remotely via crafted image-list parameters in a Smart Install packet, causing device reload. Remediation is via Cisco soft...

Design/Logic Flaw

Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2016-0800. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2016-0800. A typo caused the wrong ID to be used. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2016-0800 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this...

Design/Logic Flaw

Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2016-1868. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2016-1868. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2016-1868 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to...

CVE-2015-3591

CVE-2015-3591 is a duplicate of CVE-2014-3591. The connected records provide concrete details for CVE-2014-3591: Libgcrypt (before 1.6.3) and GnuPG (before 1.4.19) do not implement ciphertext blinding for ElGamal decryption, enabling physically proximate attackers to potentially recover server pr...

Design/Logic Flaw

Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2016-0729. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2016-0729. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2016-0729 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to...

CVE-2015-5881

Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2015-7760, CVE-2015-7761. Reason: this ID was intended for one issue, but was associated with two issues. Notes: All CVE users should consult CVE-2015-7760 and CVE-2015-7761 to identify the ID or IDs of interest. All references an...

CVE-2014-9298

Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2014-9750, CVE-2014-9751. Reason: this ID was intended for one issue, but was associated with two issues. Notes: All CVE users should consult CVE-2014-9750 and CVE-2014-9751 to identify the ID or IDs of interest. All references an...

CVE-2014-9297

The connected Debian advisory documents describe CVE-2014-9297 as a stack-based buffer overflow in ntpd’s autokey handling: when an NTP client decrypts a secret from a server, an attacker could trigger a crash. Affected software is ntpd (NTP) and the issue is tied to the incomplete fix for CVE-20...

CVE-2015-0942

Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2015-6742, CVE-2015-6743, CVE-2015-6744, CVE-2015-6745, CVE-2015-6746, CVE-2015-6747. Reason: This candidate originally combined multiple issues that have different vulnerability types and other complex abstraction issues. Notes:...