Lucene search
+L

151 matches found

RedHat Linux
RedHat Linux
•added 2024/04/18 2:35 a.m.•20 views

kernel: gro: fix ownership transfer

A flaw was found in the Linux kernel's Generic Receive Offload GRO feature, where packets processed with a fragment list are not properly orphaned due to incorrect handling of socket references. This vulnerability can cause system instability or kernel bugs. The issue has been fixed by making sur...

5.5CVSS6.7AI score0.00232EPSS
SaveExploits0References5
OSV
OSV
•added 2024/03/06 10:55 a.m.•16 views

BIT-GITEA-2020-13246

An issue was discovered in Gitea through 1.11.5. An attacker can trigger a deadlock by initiating a transfer of a repository's ownership from one organization to another...

7.5CVSS7.3AI score0.01987EPSS
SaveExploits1References4
Code423n4
Code423n4
•added 2023/10/30 12:0 a.m.•7 views

Default Admin Role will be empty after ownership transfer .

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact After an ownership transfer of the protocol , the DEFAULTADMINROLE role will be empty.Protocol cannot function properly without DEFAULTADMINROLE cause this is the single most important role in the protocol . Functionalities that only DEFAULTADMINROLE can...

7AI score
SaveExploits0
Code423n4
Code423n4
•added 2023/07/21 12:0 a.m.•10 views

newGovernance COULD BE SET TO A WRONG ADDRESS THUS FREEZING CERTAIN FUNCTIONS

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The AxelarGateway.transferGovernance function is used to set the newGovernance address in the storage of the AxelarGateway contract. It is performed as follows: function transferGovernanceaddress newGovernance external override onlyGovernance if...

6.9AI score
SaveExploits0
Code423n4
Code423n4
•added 2023/07/14 12:0 a.m.•18 views

Two-step ownership transfer process in LSP0ERC725AccountCore can be bypassed

Lines of code Vulnerability details Bug Description To transfer ownership of the LSP0ERC725AccountCore contract, the owner has to call transferOwnership to nominate a pending owner. Afterwards, the pending owner must call acceptOwnership to become the new owner. When called by the owner,...

7.2AI score
SaveExploits0
Code423n4
Code423n4
•added 2023/07/14 12:0 a.m.•10 views

Using supportsERC165InterfaceUnchecked() might break LSP functionality for certain contracts

Lines of code Vulnerability details Bug Description Throughout the codebase, the protocol uses the supportsERC165InterfaceUnchecked function from Openzeppelin's ERC165Checker.sol to check for the support of ERC-165 interface IDs. However, supportsERC165InterfaceUnchecked only checks if the call t...

6.9AI score
SaveExploits0
Code423n4
Code423n4
•added 2023/07/14 12:0 a.m.•12 views

Pending owner can be the wrong recipient of ownership

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact An attacker can call the acceptOwnership function with their address as the pending owner before the legitimate pending owner has a chance to call the function Proof of Concept The transferOwnership function allows the current owner to set a pending owne...

6.6AI score
SaveExploits0
Code423n4
Code423n4
•added 2023/07/13 12:0 a.m.•9 views

Lack of check for zero address in the function _transferOwnership before transferring ownership

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The absence of a check for the zero address address0 when transferring ownership can lead to unintended consequences and potential fund loss. If the contract allows transferring ownership to the zero address address0, it effectively means relinquishing...

6.8AI score
SaveExploits0
Code423n4
Code423n4
•added 2023/04/26 12:0 a.m.•5 views

The domain owner can transfer ownership of their domain to another individual and ownership of the domain can be returned

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The domain owner can transfer ownership of their domain by utilizing the setOwner function within the ENSRegistry.sol contract. In doing so, the original domain owner forfeits complete ownership of the domain. But, the original owner can regain ownership...

6.6AI score
SaveExploits0
Code423n4
Code423n4
•added 2023/04/19 12:0 a.m.•11 views

Position ownership could be transferred to zero address

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Ownership of a Position could be transferred to zero address. This is usually caused by mistake but the consequence is loss of collateral. Proof of Concept The position owner calls transferOwnership but accidentally set newOwner address to 0x0. Tools Use...

6.8AI score
SaveExploits0
Code423n4
Code423n4
•added 2023/03/20 12:0 a.m.•10 views

Centralization privileges could cause revenue loss or DDoS

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact DISCLAIMER: I understand that this was under known issues M-1, and I'm submitting this on another angle which is in case owner is compromised. Namespace and Tray contract allow the owner to execute some privilege actions which give flexibility but at the...

7.2AI score
SaveExploits0
OSV
OSV
•added 2023/01/13 5:32 p.m.•2 views

CAN-2023-1000000 CWE in iPhone version 1.0

In Apple iPhone version 1.0 a CWE exists in the Security Legacy enclave that can be attacked via Local access resulting in Transfer digital ownership legacy...

6.7AI score
SaveExploits0References1
Code423n4
Code423n4
•added 2023/01/09 12:0 a.m.•15 views

Unsafe Storage Layout

Lines of code Vulnerability details Potentially lead to storage collision and cause the account to be re-initialized or have ownership transferred. Use upgradeable DiamondStorage for all inherited contracts. --- The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: All reactions...

7AI score
SaveExploits0
Code423n4
Code423n4
•added 2022/12/16 12:0 a.m.•14 views

Pending owner can front-run current owner when current owner wants to cancel the ownership transfer.

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact OwnableUpgradable contract has been modified to transfer ownership in a two-step ownership transfer way. This introduces an issue of front-run when admin adds a pendingOwner but later on decides to cancel the ownership transfer. Pending owner can become...

6.7AI score
SaveExploits0
Code423n4
Code423n4
•added 2022/11/18 12:0 a.m.•13 views

Single-step process for critical ownership transfer/renounce is risky

Lines of code Vulnerability details Single-step process for critical ownership transfer/renounce is risky Impact The following contracts and functions, allow owners to interact with core functions such as: execute, rawExecute and setApproval in OwnableSmartWallet registerKnotsToSyndicate,...

6.7AI score
SaveExploits0
Code423n4
Code423n4
•added 2022/10/23 12:0 a.m.•8 views

No access control for function deployDeletateFor

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Detailed description of the impact of this finding. There is no access control for the deployDelegateFor function, so anyone can call this function and initialize all the parameters for a project. Moreover, the caller can also transfer the owner to a...

7.1AI score
SaveExploits0
Code423n4
Code423n4
•added 2022/09/15 12:0 a.m.•10 views

The contract can transfer Ownership to the zero address.

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact When we use transferOwnership or safeTransferOwnership to transfer contract ownership, there is the possibility of transferring ownership to the zero address. This will cause the owner to lose its ownership permanently. Proof of Concept In Ownable.sol...

6.9AI score
SaveExploits0
Code423n4
Code423n4
•added 2022/08/07 12:0 a.m.•11 views

Inadequate transferOwnership function prevents new owner from accessing funds

Lines of code Vulnerability details Description There are two sources of truth for identifying the account that owns a given MIMOProxy: 1. MIMOProxy.owner 2. MIMOProxyRegistry.getCurrentProxyaddress The first source of truth is only used within the proxy contract itself, and the second source of...

6.8AI score
SaveExploits0
Code423n4
Code423n4
•added 2022/08/06 12:0 a.m.•10 views

Registry not updated when proxy ownership is transferred

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact When the ownership of a MIMOProxy instance is transferred using the transferOwnership function, the MIMOProxyRegistry contract is not updated, although it is the main entry point of all the workflows, as described in the README.md file. Even after the...

6.7AI score
SaveExploits0
Code423n4
Code423n4
•added 2022/08/06 12:0 a.m.•10 views

Old owner can still set automation / management for vaults after ownership transfer

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact When the ownership of a user proxy is transferred, proxyRegistry.getCurrentProxy does not reflect this and still returns the proxy for the previous owner. This can be exploited in the access check of setAutomation. Because setManagement has the same chec...

6.7AI score
SaveExploits0
Rows per page
Query Builder