Vetoer has too huge privileges which allow to burn veto power and change his/her address

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Only a current user with veto power can either change vetoer or pernamently destroy veto power forever. Since this functions are crucial for governance, they should also be called by admin. In the current scenario, vetoer has some higher privileges in...

Proposal can executed even when it is in the "Queued" state.

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact An attacker can bypass the intended governance process and directly execute proposals that are still in the voting or canceled state. This can result in unauthorized actions being performed on the smart contract, leading to loss of funds Proof of Concept...

DoS by cancelling newly created proposals

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Malicious user can cancel any freshly created proposal, thus making the goverence not usuable to anyone. Whenever new proposal is being created, a malicious actor can cancel it. Proof of Concept Function cancel is external, thus it can be called by anyon...

LSP8CompatibleERC721._checkOnERC721Received return value is incorrect

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Can be transferred to EOA through safeTransferFrom Proof of Concept problematic code call path safeTransferFrom-safeTransfer-checkOnERC721Received safeTransferFrom annotate / @inheritdoc ILSP8CompatibleERC721 @dev Compatible with ERC721 safeTransferFrom...

Function collision between extension functions and account functions

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Users or owner can't use extensions because of collision between extension functions and account functions Proof of Concept Whenever someone calls account it will check for functions inside it, if there isn't function it goes to fallback to check...

Possible Issues Related to Well Initial State

Lines of code Vulnerability details Description && Impact After creating the Well contract, there will be no reserves in the initial state. Therefore it could lead to the following possible issues and the attackers can take advantage of them through front running. 1. Price manipulation attacks Wh...

Flash loan price manipulation in Well.sol

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Line 214 of Well.sol calculates the price of tokens to tokens in the pool based on the balances at a single point in time. Pool balances at a single point in time can be manipulated with flash loans, which can skew the numbers to the extreme. The single...

Well.sol#removeLiquidityImbalanced - Handling Excess Reserves in removeLiquidityImbalanced Function to Prevent Unnecessary Reverts

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The removeLiquidityImbalanced function in the Well.sol contract is vulnerable to a potential underflow. This could disrupt the contract's functionality and prevent users from removing liquidity in an imbalanced manner. Furthermore, the function does not...

Inflation attack in well

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The Well.sol contract is vulnerable to a first depositor attack allowing someone to directly send funds to the pool in order to obfuscate the totalSupply and steal funds from the subsequent depositor. Proof of Concept Below is how the attack can be carri...

Memory corruption in getBytes32FromBytes() can likely lead to loss of funds

Lines of code Vulnerability details Description The LibBytes library is used to read and store uint128 types compactly for Well functions. The function getBytes32FromBytes will fetch a specific index as bytes32. / @dev Read the ith 32-byte chunk from data. / function getBytes32FromBytesbytes memo...

Well.sol::addLiquidity() Unauthorized Liquidity Addition for Fee-on-Transfer Tokens

Lines of code Vulnerability details Description The addLiquidity in the Well.sol contract allows any address to add liquidity to tokens with a fee-on-transfer mechanism. Although there is a another function available to add liquidity for Fee-on-transfer token name addLiquidityFeeOnTransfer. Howev...

Stealing excess tokens from other users by either front-running skim function or calling it before legitimate user

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact File /src/interfaces/IWell.sol comment's defines what the skim function is being responsible for: / @notice Sends excess tokens held by the Well to the recipient. @param recipient The address to send the tokens @return skimAmounts The amount of each toke...

Potential draining Well via slippage imprecision and swapping the same token

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact According to Well.sol comment: // Note: The rounding approach of the Well function determines whether // slippage from imprecision goes to the Well or to the User. imprecision can either goes to the Well or User. In this scenario we will assume that Well...

Incorrect modification authorization amount

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact In a specific scenario, the authorized transfer amount from N-M M0, N0 will cause the user to lose M+N money. This solution is to first change the authorized amount to N-0 and then to 0-M. This is not the best solution suggested by the article, and it is...

LACK OF deadline CHECK COULD PROMPT DELAYED EXECUTION OF swap OPERATION

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The RewardHandler.sellRewards function is used by governance and trusted sellers to sell reward tokens for collateral tokens. This function ensures that none of the collateral should be decreased after the swap by checking their respective balances befor...

No check for active Arbitrum Sequencer

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact If the Arbitrum sequencer goes down, the stale ratio will be used during the swap. Proof of Concept readChainlinkFeed gets the price from chainlink oracle and the ratio is used during the swap. function readChainlinkFeed uint256 quoteAmount,...

Unsafe cast in getCollateralRatio()

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact LibGetters.getCollateralRatio might return the incorrect ratio due to the unsafe cast. Proof of Concept getCollateralRatio outputs the collateral ratio using the total collaterals and issued agTokens. // The stablecoinsIssued value need to be rounded up...

stealth of funds

Lines of code Vulnerability details CRITICAL Impact The LSP0ERC725Account contract executes calls to specified targets provided in the arguments, the contract can receive native coins using the payable functions or directly transfered since the contract implements a receive function. However, the...

PT-2023-25793 · Yzncms · Yzncms

Name of the Vulnerable Software and Affected Versions: YznCMS version 1.1.0 Description: A Cross-Site Request Forgery CSRF issue in the /public/admin/profile/update.html component allows attackers to change the Administrator password using a crafted POST request. Recommendations: For YznCMS versi...

_normalizeDecimals() Wrong calculation formula

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Wrong decimal place conversion, resulting in wrong quantity Proof of Concept in callOutSignedAndBridge The number of tokens will be converted to 18 decimal when packedData is performed. function callOutSignedAndBridgebytes calldata params, DepositInput...