Missing Validation which could cause Underflow Error

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Two instances of Missing Validation which could cause Underflow Error are spotted at L194 and L593 of NFTBoostVault.sol contract, from L194 there is no check to validate that oldDelegateeVotes is greater than registration.latestVotingPower and from L593...

Front run attacks during the 7 day cooldown period in setGSCAllowance.

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact A malicious miner can send a transaction from the GSC to drain the new allowance before the admin's transaction sets it. Proof of Concept The setGSCAllowance function sets a 7 day cooldown period between allowance changes for each token. This prevents th...

User able to steal all votes escrowed in LockingVault due to downcasting

Lines of code Vulnerability details Even though the LockingVault is considered out of scope, it contains very serious vulnerability allowing anyone to steal ALL Arcade voting tokens. The vulnerability is possible due to downcasting amount to withdraw to uint96. In case that the amount of tokens...

voting power is insufficiently tracked

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Historical balance tracking of votingPower is not stored due to values being updated in memory rather than storage. This means old delegatees may retain voting power which should have been removed from them, new delegatees may not not receive their...

Unrestricted Access to setRoyalty Function

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Severity: High Likelihood: High Description The setRoyalty function in the ERC2981CollectionRoyalties contract can be called by anyone. This function is used to set the royalty information for a specific token ID. However, because there are no access...

[H] Users can lose their funds if the transaction reverts on destination chain

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The transmitSendToken function in the contract facilitates cross-chain token transfers. For contracts involving ERC20 tokens it is also expected that, should a contract call fail, one's tokens are not lost/transferred elsewhere. However, the function doe...

The is no way for native tokens to get sent to InterchainProposalExecutor

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Proposals that require value cannot be executed as native tokens on the other side of the bridge cannot be provided. Proof of Concept Proposals have a value parameter, which allows users to specify what amount of native tokens should be passed when calli...

newGovernance COULD BE SET TO A WRONG ADDRESS THUS FREEZING CERTAIN FUNCTIONS

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The AxelarGateway.transferGovernance function is used to set the newGovernance address in the storage of the AxelarGateway contract. It is performed as follows: function transferGovernanceaddress newGovernance external override onlyGovernance if...

Permits may be reused after token upgrade

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The StandardizedToken contract inherits the ERC20Permit contract which in the case of an upgradable/proxied Token would allow permits for a previous version of the Token to be used on any subsequent version of it. NOTE that ERC20Permit is not explicitly ...

funds can be stolen in InterchainGovernance, Multisig and AxelarServiceGovernance contracts

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact In InterchainGovernance users can execute the proposal by passing required data and the amount of native value they want to send with executeProposal function, this function calls call function in Caller contract, but this function insted of checking...

EL Injection Vulnerability in Hitachi Replication Manager

Overview An EL Injection Vulnerability CVE-2022-4146 exists in Hitachi Replication Manager. Impact Regarding the impact of the vulnerability, please refer to the vendor advisory. Solution Please refer to the 'Vendor Information' section for the official countermeasure and take appropriate action...

Claim failure can result to loss of funds

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Caller will lose funds through gas fees when claim fails Proof of Concept The claimPrize function allows any caller to claim a prize by providing the necessary parameters: winner address of the winner, tier prize tier, prizeIndex prize index,...

No access control on mintYieldFee

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Lack of access-control allows anyone to mint the yield fee to himself. Proof of Concept Vault.mintYieldFee does not restrict the recipient yield fees: function mintYieldFeeuint256 shares, address recipient external requireVaultCollateralized; if shares...

CONFIGURING ALLOWANCE TO ZERO FOR THE _previousLiquidationPair CAN BE FRONT RUN

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The Vault.setLiquidationPair is used to change the liquidationPair address to a new address. In the process it sets the allowance of the previousLiquidationPair to zero as shown below: if previousLiquidationPair != address0...

Deposit transaction is prone to being front-run by bad actors.

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact It is possible for an attacker to front-run a user's deposit transaction while transferring fewer amount of assets than the user and minting an equivalent amount of shares as the user could have. Proof of Concept The scenario described below is for the...

balanceOf method can be manipulate to liquidated vault

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Deriving price from balanceOf can be manipulated to liquidate vault see example Attacker can provide ERC20 token to the vaultAsset and mint vault shares. The deposited tokens will then be withdrawn with having same shares in the vault. The shares then wi...

Malicious yield vault owners can manipulate the interaction between the vault and yield vault

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Malicious yield vault owners can steal depositor's assets. Proof of Concept yieldVault is the Address of the ERC4626 vault in which assets are deposited to generate yield. After tokens are deposited into the vault, the deposit function of yieldVault is...

Failed transfer with low level call could be overlooked

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Transfers may fail silently. Proof of Concept According to the Solidity docs: "The low-level functions call, delegatecall and staticcall return true as their first return value if the account called is non-existent, as part of the design of the EVM...

Users might lose their balances when they set delegates

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Undelegated users will lose their balances if they set delegate to themselves. Proof of Concept A User can set a delegate and the delegated balance of the user will be accounted on the delegate's delegated balance in the TWAB controller. The internal...

Missing Input Validation

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The below situations do not have checks on their inputs: When bytes12inputDataKey == LSP6KEYADDRESSPERMISSIONSPERMISSIONSPREFIX: // AddressPermissions:Permissions: if bytes12inputDataKey == LSP6KEYADDRESSPERMISSIONSPERMISSIONSPREFIX // controller already...