IBM Security Verify Governance Code Issue Vulnerability

IBM Security Verify Governance is an intelligent identity access platform from International Business Machines IBM, Inc. provides organizations with a platform to analyze, define and control user access and access risk. A code issue vulnerability exists in IBM Security Verify Governance version...

PT-2023-25097 · Ibm · Ibm Security Verify Governance Identity Manager +1

Name of the Vulnerable Software and Affected Versions: IBM Security Verify Governance version 10.0 IBM Security Verify Governance Identity Manager version 10.0 Description: The issue is related to improper file validation, allowing a privileged user to upload arbitrary files. Additionally, there ...

PT-2023-25095 · Ibm · Ibm Security Verify Governance

Name of the Vulnerable Software and Affected Versions: IBM Security Verify Governance version 10.0 Description: The issue allows a local privileged user to obtain sensitive information from source code. Recommendations: For IBM Security Verify Governance version 10.0, at the moment, there is no...

IBM Security Verify Governance Security Breach

IBM Security Verify Governance is an intelligent identity access platform from International Business Machines IBM, Inc. provides organizations with a platform to analyze, define and control user access and access risk. A security vulnerability exists in IBM Security Verify Governance version 10....

The UN Risks Normalizing Internet Censorship

The United Nations' top internet governance body will allegedly host its next two annual meetings in countries known for repressive internet policies and human rights abuses...

Security Bulletin: IBM Security Verify Governance - Identity Manager (Virtual Appliance) is affected by multiple vulnerabilities (CVE-2023-35903, CVE-2023-35018, CVE-2023-35013, X-Force ID 220945)

Summary IBM Security Verify Governance - Identity Manager Virtual Appliance is vulnerable to arbitrary file upload, escalation of privileges, and sensitive information leak. These issues have been addressed in this update. Vulnerability Details CVEID:CVE-2023-35903 DESCRIPTION: IBM Security Verif...

Missing validation lets users delegate more than they own.

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The amounts array is not checked to ensure the sum is less than or equal to the user's overall token balance. This could allow someone to delegate more tokens than they own. Proof of Concept This is another validation issue in the delegateMulti function...

Hash Collisions and Front-Running Risk

Lines of code Vulnerability details Salt Value in Proxy Deployment: The contract uses a salt value of 0 during the deployment of proxy delegator contracts. This introduces a significant security concern related to potential hash collisions. If multiple delegators attempt to deploy to the same...

New OS Tool Tells You Who Has Access to What Data

Ensuring sensitive data remains confidential, protected from unauthorized access, and compliant with data privacy regulations is paramount. Data breaches result in financial and reputational damage but also lead to legal consequences. Therefore, robust data access security measures are essential ...

Security Bulletin: IBM Security Verify Governance is affected by multiple vulnerabilities

Summary IBM Security Verify Governance uses various components, such as IBM Java, and Dojo. Security vulnerabilities in multiple components have been addressed in the IBM Security Verify Governance update. Vulnerability Details CVEID:CVE-2021-22569 DESCRIPTION: Google Protocol Buffer protobuf-jav...

require statement commented posses attack by malicious contract

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The 'require' statement commented posses attack by malicious contract. The LiquidityMiningPath.sol contract has the Governance requirement of the ‘require’ statement commented. If the intention was to make use of the ‘require’ statement, uncomment it so ...

Event not emitted after sensitive action of setting new concentrated and ambient rewards.

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The 'setConcRewards' and 'setAmbRewards' doesn't emit event to to signify to all parties involved the new concentrated and ambient results. Proof of Concept A user not aware of new reward price might suppose he/she have been swindled upon realizing that...

Access control check in the setAmbRewards and setAmbRewards functions is missing

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Any user can call the setAmbRewards and setAmbRewards functions and set their values for weeklyReward, which opens up many attack vectors. For example, it is possible to set a large reward and withdraw all funds from the protocol. Proof of Concept functi...

The governance will fail to add an ecosystem token if someone creates a hToken that uses that ecosystem token

Lines of code Vulnerability details Ecosystem tokens are tokens that dont have an underlying token address in any branch and only the global representation exists. The governance adds them by calling addEcosystemToken where the ecoTokenGlobalAddress will be the Maia or Hermes token as the sponsor...

Lack of proper access restrictions on functions setConcRewards() and setAmbRewards()

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Contract Reward distribution can be drained / manipulated Proof of Concept For setConcRewards and setAmbRewards, they are both lack of proper access restrictions, leads to the situation that anyone can execute these functions. This oversight presents a...

Front-Running Vulnerability: Exploiting Reward Updates for Maximized Payouts

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Malicious users claim rewards at a higher rate than what was intended by front-running governance actions meant to reduce rewards. This allows them to claim rewards at a higher rate than what was intended, undermining the protocol's intended economic...

Missing Access Control on setConcRewards and setAmbRewards

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The function setConcRewards and setAmbRewards are accessible by any user to set the rewardsConcentrated and Ambient rewards. Proof of Concept The access validations are commented out. function setConcRewardsbytes32 poolIdx, uint32 weekFrom, uint32 weekTo...

Which security framework? All of them, in the SCF

TL;DR: All roads lead to Rome. There are plenty of ways to meet your security requirements ISO 27001 is not everything. There, I said it What is the Secure Controls Framework SCF? Why you should consider SCF on your journey to security excellence PTP has a myriad of customers coming for help to...

Live Webinar: Overcoming Generative AI Data Leakage Risks

As the adoption of generative AI tools, like ChatGPT, continues to surge, so does the risk of data exposure. According to Gartner's "Emerging Tech: Top 4 Security Risks of GenAI" report, privacy and data security is one of the four major emerging risks within generative AI. A new webinar featurin...

2023 OWASP Top-10 Series: API8:2023 Security Misconfiguration

Welcome to the 9th post in our weekly series on the new 2023 OWASP API Security Top-10 list, with a particular focus on security practitioners. This post will focus on API8:2023 Security Misconfiguration. In this series we are taking an in-depth look at each category – the details, the impact and...